Conservative radio host Glenn Beck is at it again. Beck, known for his outrages comments on American political life, is now saying that he plans to expose what he calls a government cover-up and conspiracy involving the Boston Marathon bombings.
According to Beck's website, The Blaze, a Saudi national previously believed to have been a person of interest in the attack was to be deported under Section 212 3B. The section, which is found in the Department of Justice's Executive Office for Review's benchbook, is called "Classes for Aliens Ineligible for Visas or Admission-Terrorist Activities."
http://www.latinospost.com/articles/173 … ver-up.htm
Watch the video and decide for yourself I suppose.Glenn likes controversy
Instead of conservative show host they should call him controversial show host. The dude is an idiot that would say anything to draw the spotlight on himself. .
Hmm. I thought he might spin it on an Arab, or something. Beck has never had a thought in his head that wasn't filtered through zionist prejudice.
The Saudi was a witness? It is perfectly normal to deport a witness only days after a crime. Nothing to see here, government says everything under control, go about your consuming as normal. Do not question authority, it is not in your best interest!
He was questioned. They discovered something in his background they did not like. They deported him.
And... Beck is an imbecile...
Yeah, they discovered he was a wealthy Saudi. Can't do anything to embarrass the mighty Saudi regime, the financiers!
Agreed, though to question things is not wrong.
The FBI questioned the suspect a few years ago.
The FBI has initiated terrorist attacks in order to arrest their culprits.
Their was an overwhelming number of mercenaries in Boston on the day.
Perhaps the FBI's patsies did not use the particular bombs that were given to them, maybe they supplied their own.
Could the Saudi have been an FBI operative?
There are definitely some questions that need to be answered.
I was wondering how long will it take for conspiracies theories to surface? Now that it started we will hear lots of them, one more "interesting" than the next
The CRAFT mercenaries have been questioned from the beginning. Government silence on this issue is flaming the conspiracies. Who were they working for, why were they there?
Of course Glenn Beck is stirring controversy. He makes a lot of money off the gullible.
Chambliss: Law enforcement agency may have had info about Boston bombing in advance
WASHINGTON — Georgia Sen. Saxby Chambliss told Channel 2 Action News late Tuesday afternoon that a law enforcement agency may have had information in advance of the Boston bombings that wasn't properly shared.
"There now appears that may have been some evidence that was obtained by one of the law enforcement agencies that did not get shared in a way that it could have been. If that turns out to be the case, then we have to determine whether or not that would have made a difference," Chambliss said.
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/ch … -ab/nXT7x/
Keep consuming, nothing to question here?
If the suspect in the hospital had a Student Visa to go to
school in Ohio and had an apt. in Boston, Mass. plus
was in the file of being a Terrorist - why was this not questioned
unless Beck is correct in thinking there was a second with
the same name. I disagree with calling Beck all these derogatory
names. This man goes in depth on getting the whole story,
he's a great speaker and teacher of history and government.
Maybe the general public is having the wool pulled over their eyes
and how dare they think any foul play could be perpetrated by
our own government. What kind of a sick violent bastard could
bomb a joyous family event at a running marathon anyway? There
is no sense to it.
Althought I can't stand Beck and his affiliates. I personally believe that the FBI was involved in the Boston bombing. It is the copycat of the killing spree that happened several months ago in France. A 22 year-old kid went on rampage and got killed by the DGSE, the equivalent of the FBI. The police knew that he went to Pakistan, that he had a strong religious belief and in spite of that he was not monitored. Why?The little information that leaked out stated his involvement with the police. Few weeks later, a law limiting the people's freedom was implemented.
After FBI closed investigation, months later, CIA puts him on TIDE - I thought creating DHS was supposed to solve these problems.
Only one 9 mm pistol with the serial number filed off has been recovered. - So that means that it was like a Clint Eastwood movie the Gauntlet? There was a constant barrage of gunfire over time that night in Boston.
FBI FUBAR trying to CYA because Tsarnaev Tamerlane in 2012 went to workshops and seminars for young people of the Caucasus and didn't even know when he flew back.
Thank goodnes Glenn Beck is back in the limelight stirring up conspiracy theories.
Alex Jones has, despite valiant and longstanding efforts, never enjoyed the podium
on the same scale as Beck.
Just so I'm clear, which are/were government coverups with blatant intent to limit American freedoms and which were not?
a) Boston Marathon bombing
b) Newtown shooting
c) Blizzard of 2013
d) Hurricane Sandy
e) Benghazi
f) Gabby Giffords shooting
g) Killing bin Laden
h) 9/11
i) Killing of JFK
J) Killing of RFK
k) Killing of MLK
l) Pearl Harbor
m) Stock market crash of 1929
n) Lincoln assassination
o) Boston Tea Party
p) Some of the above. Please select
q) None of the above
r) All of the above
s) Don't you know ANYTHING, Mighty Mom!!?
You missed several blatant ones! Go back to Conspiracy Theory 101 and retake!
(Sorry, it's getting late and my eyes are tired and my tin foil hat is starting to hurt my head).
I think the gov't tried to execute both of them but one survived because according to Attorney General Eric Holder , "The president could use lethal force against American citizens on U.S. soil in an extraordinary circumstance, one that resembles something like the catastrophic domestic attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and Pearl Harbor."
I'm gullible? Well: explain this:
"Authorities initially reported Todashev had lunged at the FBI agent with a knife, which provoked the shooting. However, officials later said it was no longer clear what had happened. Condo neighbor, Brian Carvajal made several statements that include; "Todashev was rich ... no way he would have signed a confession without an attorney ... 60 seconds of the gunshots, OPD were swarming into the complex, suggesting officers called for backup before they shot Todashev."
Of course, rich people would never do anything like that....
Sum Ting Wong, I mean these guys are professional, they take down criminals every day. 1 FBI and 2 local cops were in the with this guy. So he's pretending to sign a confession and the FBI get stabbed multiple times with the pen and shoots the guy. What were the two local cops doing at this point?
Unless the dead guy turned green, bulked up to the incredible Hulk, the two local cops in the same room would have used take down procedures, tactics used every day. Unless - what - they were all girls not more than 5'2"? That would be stupid of the police to sent small people to take down a MMA fighter. I would hope that at least one officer was a brawny ex- combat vet or something.
What ever happened, it was totally FUBAR (again!) by the FBI. Cops are trained to take down a suspect, when extra judicial executions happen, and can't even be explained by the FBI themselves as to "what happened" then it's time to take said head from butthole and realize that SUM TING WONG here. Very very wrong.
Was this
FUBAR
or
SNAFU?
by William R. Wilson7 years ago
Why does he hate America?http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/7/20 … s-UPDATED-
by Stacie L7 years ago
Glenn Beck Losing It. Glenn Beck was a target Friday when Joe Scarborough claims he is losing it before our eyes. The “Morning Joe” host said the Fox commentator has gone “out of control” and is “bad for the...
by Susan Reid7 years ago
By Paul FarhiWhen you have a group of religious leaders taking out an ad in the WSJ demanding that your boss (Roger Ailes)tell you to STOP with the Nazi comments, do you stop? Or do you gleefully continue with your...
by lady_love1587 years ago
So is anyone here going?http://www.glennbeck.com/828/
by Ralph Deeds7 years ago
A long article in this week's "The New Yorker" by Sean Wilentz entitled "Confounding Fathers" traces the antecedents of Glenn Beck's rants and the Tea Party's hysteria to two individuals who spouted...
by Ron Montgomery8 years ago
Glenn Beck is losing sponsors (his life blood) at a rate that threatens his future as a TV/Radio ranter.33 and counting.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
terms of use privacy policy (0.38 sec)