Scientific Fraud on 9/11 - The Government Lied - Entire World Affected

Jump to Last Post 1-9 of 9 discussions (20 posts)
  1. lone77star profile image82
    lone77starposted 5 years ago

    Science is great, when it's used to tell the truth. Even a relative truth is better than a blatant lie.

    I just watched another excellent video by Jonathan H. Cole with experiments proving NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) lied in its 9/11 reports. They committed blatant scientific fraud.

    This 10-minute video is a must-see for anyone interested in the future. Why? Because American policy is based on 9/11, and the government lied! People continue to die because of 9/11. Liberty is dying because of 9/11. American financial irresponsibility is based partly on 9/11 (overspending at an accelerating pace -- a bubble that will pop with disastrous results for planet Earth).

    9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s

    This isn't "conspiracy theory." The government did enough of that already, feeding us the OBL theory. This is simple, scientific fact.

    Why would government scientists commit scientific fraud? This might open the door to some conspiracy theories, but that doesn't help.

    A better question, now that we know the government is lying about 9/11, is what should we do about it?

    Get angry? Riot? Start a new government? Boycott? Try to fix it by entering politics? Bury our heads and forget about it?

    1. Jane Bovary profile image79
      Jane Bovaryposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Could have fooled me..

      1. janesix profile image61
        janesixposted 5 years agoin reply to this

        Isn't it hard to breath with your head buried under the sand?

        1. Jane Bovary profile image79
          Jane Bovaryposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          Right, because *knowing* the government lied about 9/11, apparently on the strength of a ten minute video, is a perfectly reasonable conclusion to draw.

          1. janesix profile image61
            janesixposted 5 years agoin reply to this

            Where did you come up with that nonsense?

            Go back to bad, you are already asleep.

    2. profile image0
      Brenda Durhamposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      That video wasn't clear nor was the guy's hypothesis proven.
      There are too many variables that his experimentation couldn't prove anyway.

    3. A Troubled Man profile image60
      A Troubled Manposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      lol True, conspiracy theorists always claim their conspiracy theories are not conspiracy theories.

      It is very sad to see believers not only distort reality for what it is, but go well beyond the ridiculous and absurd to fallaciously and inexcusably distort science and that which they have no understanding.

  2. janesix profile image61
    janesixposted 5 years ago

    Of course they lied.

    That's what they are paid to do.

  3. Zelkiiro profile image94
    Zelkiiroposted 5 years ago
  4. innersmiff profile image72
    innersmiffposted 5 years ago

    If you are all so sure it's nonsense, why not enlighten the rest of us as to exactly why you think this way? Analyse the argument, and rebut the points made. Not "but somebody would have talked" or "why would the government want to kill their own people?", irrelevant buzz-phrases that don't address the argument at hand.

  5. American View profile image60
    American Viewposted 5 years ago

    The biggest part of the experiment that is wrong is they drop a separate object on top of another object from a distance. That is not how the towers collapsed. All the towers floors are connected, the top of the building was not lifted off and dropped onto the structure. The theory of Newton is not the type of force in play here, but it is more along the lines of inertia.

    By the way, the cue ball hitting the eight ball was cute but a joke, . Hitting the cue ball with the proper english can make the cue ball travel completely across the pool table, not come to a stop in a few inches as shown in the video. Striking the cue ball with different english evertime will yield a different result, the cue ball will come to rest in many different locations on the table. What lesson does this show us, that people can pick, choose, skew and spin data into any conclusion to attempt to further their agenda.

  6. Will Apse profile image91
    Will Apseposted 5 years ago

    I've been poking around in the conspiracy business. A lot of money to be made from gullible folk.

    Hagman and Hagman have a fine line of products in the 'Giants' and 'Mighty Men of Old' niche.

    I suppose it's never too late to cash in on the murder of couple of thousand people in New York...

  7. psycheskinner profile image82
    psycheskinnerposted 5 years ago

    The guy who made that video has a pretty weak grasp of both physics and the experimental method.  For a good analysis get the Popular Mechanics special issue on 9/11.

    1. lone77star profile image82
      lone77starposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Popular Mechanics? You've got to be joking. You have a pretty weak grasp of logic.

      http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html

  8. Zelkiiro profile image94
    Zelkiiroposted 5 years ago

    Oh hey, I just thought of another response!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzUybHO-EP8

  9. lone77star profile image82
    lone77starposted 5 years ago
    1. A Troubled Man profile image60
      A Troubled Manposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      There are a multitude of websites that debunk the 911 truth movement.

      https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/

      1. lone77star profile image82
        lone77starposted 5 years agoin reply to this

        And there are a multitude of websites that debunk the debunkers.

        Here's one video that knocks it out of the ballpark.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrjcXOJIWw0


        The funny thing about the debunkers is that they invariable give alternative theories, but never debunk anything. An alternate theory is only that -- a theory.

        Building 7 collapsed at perfect free fall acceleration for the first 8 floors. That's a fact admitted by NIST. But ignored by NIST is the fact that such perfect free fall means zero resistance. Steel beams NEVER offer zero resistance unless controlled demolition is involved.

        I wonder if you could ever debunk that. Simple physics.

        If a meteor lands on your head, it's going to slow down a tiny bit, because it has to perform the work of crushing your otherwise empty skull. Now, does some of the simple logic start to sink in?

        1. Zelkiiro profile image94
          Zelkiiroposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          A small group of determined extremists with over a decade of planning and practice managed to strike us on our own turf?

          IT MUST BE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLANATION

        2. A Troubled Man profile image60
          A Troubled Manposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          lol And, you're here to tell us about physics? The guy who tells us Jesus opened up a boulevard of gridlocked traffic just for YOU? lol



          Hilarious, every picture shows the beams falling faster than the debris cloud, which is falling faster than the building itself. Yes, simple physics. lol

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)