US Supreme Court ruled DNA swab after arrest is OK

Jump to Last Post 1-5 of 5 discussions (12 posts)
  1. IslandBites profile image87
    IslandBitesposted 5 years ago

    The Supreme Court concluded criminal suspects can be subjected to a police DNA test after arrest -- before trial and conviction...
    Do you agree with the decision?

    1. Josak profile image61
      Josakposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      So long as the sample and record is destroyed if the person is not charged or found not guilty it's fine. That is how it works in most of the world.

  2. psycheskinner profile image82
    psycheskinnerposted 5 years ago

    It is an interesting argument that DNA testing is not different from finger-printing in terms of identifying people, and so should also be permitted.  It makes me wonder why/when finger-printing was permitted.

  3. psycheskinner profile image82
    psycheskinnerposted 5 years ago

    But that is not what this law allows.  The sample, as with a fingerprint, is used to match arrested people to other crimes already on the record.

    1. Josak profile image61
      Josakposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hmm in that case I don't approve, people should not have any ongoing negative repercussions due to being suspected of a crime or being found innocent.

      1. wilderness profile image98
        wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

        What would be the negative repercussions if there is no other crime OR the person is innocent?  Besides, that is, clearing that person of wrongdoing instead of pinning the crime on him while the real perpetrator goes free?

        1. Josak profile image61
          Josakposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          Clearing him or finding him guilty is obviously important, that is why taking the sample is just fine so long as it is destroyed.

          The negative repercussion is simply that someone now no longer has a freedom that they had before, before they could choose not to have their DNA on record, now they do even though they did nothing wrong.

        2. psycheskinner profile image82
          psycheskinnerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          Because of familial testing it could be used to finger members of your family rather than just yourself.

          On one hand the innocent have nothing to fear, on the other hand that is the excuse used whenever totalitarian powers are brought in. Even the guilty have some rights to not incriminate themselves or others. And the maybe guilty/maybe not have the right not to be summarily searched for no good reason.

          1. wilderness profile image98
            wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

            How is DNA going to incriminate a person any more than their fingerprints, facial features, body build or any other feature unique to them?  At most it is more definite, but that's all.

            "Good reason" - isn't that how we do wiretaps and other surveillance?  Because it's for "good reason"?

            1. psycheskinner profile image82
              psycheskinnerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

              That is why my first comment was: I wonder why fingerprinting upon arrest is allowed? Because the equivalence is pretty high.  The only difference being DNA can incriminate your blood relatives too. 

              It is a matter of what what point is it a search and seizing property which requires a warrant.  I would have thought taking possession on non-abandoned spit from inside one's mouth would arguably cross that line.

  4. Reality Bytes profile image85
    Reality Bytesposted 5 years ago

    If the DNA is potential evidence of criminal activity, it is no different from other evidence.  If an individual is taken in to custody and needs to be positively identified, reasonably suspected of having committed a crime, I see nothing wrong with it.

    When it turns in to a database to keep us safe from potential future crimes, with no suspicion of criminal activity, that is tyranny.  When it becomes mandatory during every traffic stop, airplane boarding etc..., it is too late!

  5. SpanStar profile image60
    SpanStarposted 5 years ago

    It is the misuse of evidence collected which concerns me. Innocent people have been convicted on evidence collected due to an overzealous attorney, perhaps the planting of evidence by a law enforcement official and let's get serious once they have that information of yours why would they ever want to destroy it? It will remain in the database just in case they needed in the future.

    The one thing we do consistently is collect information on people guilty or not. All the information on the Internet catalogued and stored-for what reason-I doubt the majority of people are committing crimes by simply using the Internet. Telephone conversations are being collected by government officials-why? If people aren't engaged in any criminal activity so what reason are they keeping private information?

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)