Fmr French Foreign minister confirms that the attack on Syria was...

1. 74

   maxoxam41posted 4 years ago

   Prepared since 2010 in the UK. They also asked him whether he would participate. He refused. To the question why would Assad be destituated, he answers that his anti-israeli language was the main motive. He also refers to a confidence that a fmr israeli prime minister made to him : "if we get along with our neighbor it is fine, if we don't we will kill them.".
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vz5EKlI … r_embedded
   Your opinion?

   replyreport
   1. 61

      Silverspeederposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Why would Israel want to remove Assad?
      
      http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/robin-l … 50461.html
      
      With Assad Israel know what to expect, without Assad the region becomes more dangerous then ever.
      
      Not always as black and white as we would like.
      "The French Foreign Ministry has issued a statement here in connection with reports that France had protested to Israel about the Israeli action against Syria. France, the statement said had not protested, but had, rather, expressed its regret at the incident some sources here said today that M. Pinay expressed disapproval of an extremely aggressive statement issued this week-end by the Syrian Embassy in Paris. The Syrian statement said “Israel has no moral personality which is valid internationally. Born out of aggression, she will perish of aggression.”"

      replyreport
      1. 74

         maxoxam41posted 4 years agoin reply to this

         Assad is the only one in the region that is not subjected to the American and Israeli yolk. Assad is the second Iranian ally. With Assad the region will stay the middle east. With Assad Israel and the U.S. are slowed down from their hegemony.
         What are you talking about?
         
         
         Which embassy will keep its calm given that France is sending weapons to arm rebels that aim at eterminating its people, which embassy will keep its calm when few weeks ago Israel bombed Syria for no reason? Will the British embassy send roses to the Israeli one if it occured? Come on let's be realistic.
         In what way their language doesn't represent the reality? It has neither moral personality, nor peaceful intentions. We always devilize countries that did nothing to Israel. Israel says nothing but attacks all of them. Why aren't we opening our mouths?
         I live in a free country and I'm opening my mouth. So far Israel is the only aggressor, and the one who will state the contrary is biased or a liar.

         replyreport
         1. 61

            Silverspeederposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I don't see Israel as the only aggressor but i will agree that they do seem a little trigger happy, maybe its the history that makes them that way.
            There is no doubt that Iran is also an aggressor and most of Israels neighbours side with Iran.

            replyreport