jump to last post 1-2 of 2 discussions (11 posts)

BOMBING IRAQ AGAIN?

  1. maxoxam41 profile image74
    maxoxam41posted 3 years ago

    Every informed person knows that Obama's decision to bomb AGAIN Iraq is for economical and strategic reasons and the result is the killing of thousands of innocents, why are we LETHARGIC? Where are the protesting voices? Your opinion on Obama's warmongering?

    1. wilderness profile image99
      wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      And what are the results of NOT bombing?  The "killing of thousands of innocents", just as you say?

      1. maxoxam41 profile image74
        maxoxam41posted 3 years agoin reply to this

        Firstly everybody knows that every move made on the Iraqi soil was US triggered (Brzezinski doesn't hide it, he created and launched takfirist/wahhabi hords to destabilize countries that we "SAVE" in the end). Iraq is the perfect example. We invaded it. The problem was the persistence of resistance. Now with our legions of Wahhabi mercenaries we bar the middle east entrance to countries like China that is craving oil. Everybody knows but the uninformed that China had a juicy deal with Al Maleki and suddenly we are marching AGAIN. The coincidence is too flagrant don't you think.

    2. GA Anderson profile image82
      GA Andersonposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Max, that is just plain nuts!

      ps. I should know better, (but you have shown flashes of rationality at times) . and this should be taken as a genuine question - Is English a second language for you? What is your nationality/culture?

      GA

      1. maxoxam41 profile image74
        maxoxam41posted 3 years agoin reply to this

        Again, why don't you enlighten us? Mickey Huff, Andy Lee Roth, Webster Griffin Tarpley among others agree upon my precedent assertion are they, too, nuts? Is it your best argumentation?

  2. Silverspeeder profile image60
    Silverspeederposted 3 years ago

    Anyone who thinks its a case of simple economics is an idiot.

    1. maxoxam41 profile image74
      maxoxam41posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Then enlighten us. To call me "idiot" should grant you a ban, shouldn't it?

      1. Silverspeeder profile image60
        Silverspeederposted 3 years agoin reply to this

        So are you telling me that you had me banned for not agreeing with you the last time i commented on one of your hate filled posts?

        1. maxoxam41 profile image74
          maxoxam41posted 3 years agoin reply to this

          No I am just saying that if hubpages was doing its job you should not be answering me. A ban shouldn't be upon your disagreement but your insult. You subtly called me idiot, didn't you? Don't distort my words.
          In what way your assertion is a truism? You insulted me because your "argumentation" was flawed.

          1. Silverspeeder profile image60
            Silverspeederposted 3 years agoin reply to this

            My statement was general, the fact that you took it personal is of no matter to me. My observation from your posts is that you are a Jew hater and will skew the truth to promote your point.

            The history is plain and simple, skewing it to match your point doesn't make you clever now does it.

            If you would like to report me as you have done in the past then go ahead but i would of thought you of all people would abhor censorship!

            1. maxoxam41 profile image74
              maxoxam41posted 3 years agoin reply to this

              Firstly I am NOT a Jew hater, I am a Zionist hater. A Jew is a religious man, everybody is entitled to their religion. I am tolerant.
              What is your version of history?
              I NEVER EVER reported anyone and NEVER will. And for once, you thought well!

 
working