One of the reasons we won't see a republican president in our lifetime

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (18 posts)
  1. mio cid profile image59
    mio cidposted 9 years ago

    One of the reasons we won't see a republican president in our lifetime is because Democrats recognize the fact that in order to win the presidency the democratic candidate has to be a " Republican Light "  but the republican base is not willing to accept a " Democrat Light " as their candidate .

    1. GA Anderson profile image83
      GA Andersonposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Hmm... I think a strong Republican candidate with wide popular support, (maybe an amalgamation of Rubio, Christy, and Jeb Bush), may force the party to "see the light."

      But if their playbook stays the same as the last two elections, I think you could be right.

      I am optimistic that there is enough new blood in the party to force some of the needed changes.


      1. mio cid profile image59
        mio cidposted 9 years agoin reply to this

        Even though I am a Democrat , I see no benefit for the country in having the republican party limited to being an obstructionist opposition party rather than a party capable of winning elections.

        1. Credence2 profile image78
          Credence2posted 9 years agoin reply to this

          The GOP serves as purpose a counterbalance to the Dems. But they have to be rational and stop talking about the modern world in terms of JP Morgan, whalebone corsets and gunboat diplomacy.

          1. mio cid profile image59
            mio cidposted 9 years agoin reply to this

            Can they do this while the base is still in denial ?

            1. Credence2 profile image78
              Credence2posted 9 years agoin reply to this

              I doubt it, when it comes to stubborn, the political hard right, is a good synonym. They have to get that faction to heel if they are ever going to have a chance, and the left and all of its factions are no where near as menacing

      2. Coolpapa profile image65
        Coolpapaposted 9 years agoin reply to this

        What is it that anyone sees in Marco Rubio?  The man will tell a lie when the truth fits him better!

        1. mio cid profile image59
          mio cidposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          He is a new face in a party of old white men. He is hispanic in a party that is losing the hispanic and minority vote more and more with every election .

        2. bBerean profile image60
          bBereanposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          Wow.  Sounds like you're aware of Rubio telling a lot of lies.  Let's hear the exact quotes with reference to where the context can be found to verify they are viable examples of him actually putting forward as truth something he clearly knew was not, for your top five examples.  Personally I am not aware of any but here's your chance to back up your statement and edify those of us who never knew.

      3. Credence2 profile image78
        Credence2posted 9 years agoin reply to this

        I doubt it, the GOP movers and shakers indicated that they lost the last time because of moderates. With contentious social issues in the mix, take your pick of the three that represent differing wings of the party; Santorum, (Christy, Jeb Bush), Senator Paul, do you think they will find common ground enough to agree among themselves to put forth a viable candidate for the general electorate this time.

        1. GA Anderson profile image83
          GA Andersonposted 9 years agoin reply to this

          You are probably right for 2016 - still too many of the old guard left. But, I see most glasses as half-full, so there is always hope.


    2. profile image0
      HowardBThinameposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      I think we'll see a Republican in 2016. You have to remember that Obama was an anomaly - and that even during the Iraq war, the Dems could not beat the GOP.

      Hillary - the Dems top choice - won't pull in the voting block Obama pulled in to put her over the top. Historians are quite clear that being able to draw in more than 95% of the black vote was instrumental in Obama's two wins.

      The GOP has a number of strong contenders, but if Hillary drops out, the Dems have no one. Warren is a good choice for them but she comes with too little name recognition.  Hillary comes with a lot of baggage on foreign policy that has contributed to the rise of ISIS.

      Dems aren't going to take 2016. I'd bet my favorite hat on it.

    3. rhamson profile image70
      rhamsonposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      The reason we won't see a Republican in the White House in the near future can be summed up with two words. Tea Party. Whether you can get behind their rhetoric or around their reputation there is a danger in accepting extreme anything. Throwing the economy into a tailspin seems to be what they are aiming at with shut downs and austerity measures. The only people they hurt are those they are plying for support.

  2. Kathleen Cochran profile image76
    Kathleen Cochranposted 9 years ago

    I think if Obama only won by pulling in his minority as a voting block, Hillary ought to have a good shot at winning if she pulls in her voting block - women.  Women are not, and never have been, a minority in the U.S.  I read somewhere that women decide the presidency most of the time, because they are the largest group of voters in every election.  Can't confirm that but I remember reading it more than once.

    1. wilderness profile image96
      wildernessposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Sad, isn't it, when a person's vote is determined by sex, or skin color, or religious affiliation?

      1. profile image0
        HowardBThinameposted 9 years agoin reply to this

        It really is sad, Wilderness. I get a kick out of the interviews they do before an election, making it obvious that a good percentage of the population don't take the time to find out who's running - and what their platforms are.

        Everyone wants to "get out the vote," but when people are voting based on race or sex, the integrity of our electoral system is skewed.

        Maybe it's time for a voting test!  LOL

    2. profile image0
      HowardBThinameposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Women tend to vote their party - not so much just for another woman. And women - dare I say this - are not always nice to candidates that are female. Think how they destroyed Sarah Palin!  That was seriously vicious. 

      Democrat women would love Hillary for the most part, minus her part in destabilizing the Middle East, but will Democrat men feel the same way?

      Plus, I for one am tired of the family dynasties. In a nation of more than 250 million people, why do we continue to elect members of the same family to the highest office in the land. Surely, we can find someone else. No more Bushes - no more Clintons. Please.

      Let's get some fresh faces and ideas in the White House.

  3. innersmiff profile image66
    innersmiffposted 9 years ago

    Die-hard Republicans would disagree with you strongly, seeing Obama and the like as closet commies, But I think we all have the tendency to see our opposition as the extreme ideologues. Personally I don't think there's a principled representative of either party.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)