If one does a search on information regarding banning Police Departments from having Military Type equipment and weapons, You will come up with pages of info on this topic.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=co … +equipment
With the terrorist attacks in Paris, and most recently San Bernardino, Ca., is banning Military Type equipment from our Police still a wise thing to do? It is obvious that ISIS and other Terrorist organizations are well armed and our local Police will always be the first responders to these type of attacks. I also believe that we will be seeing more of these type incidents in the near future.
It is my opinion that our Police should be armed and trained as well as, or better than, the enemy they must deal with. Terrorist activity on our own soil is not something we are accustomed to but we need to be prepared.
I would be interested in your own opinions on this subject.
It really depends on the police department and whether or not the particular cops are trustworthy and very well trained. I say this as someone whose dad was a cop and a Cold-War survivalist.
No matter how well you are trained, there's a greater danger of having an accident with a fully-automatic assault rifle. You can't just hand one to an average cop and expect his previous training with regular rifles and handguns to keep him and innocent bystanders safe.
Actual soldiers generally use automatic weapons in war zones, places where innocent civilians and soldiers who die due to "friendly" fire don't matter much to those in charge. If you've fired one, you know it isn't easy to be accurate with it, even if you use tightly controlled bursts. Professional soldiers almost never use their assault rifles on full auto. It's what you give people who'll never be sharp-shooters to point in a general direction and hope they hit something due to rate of fire.
People highly trained in the use of handguns and sniper rifles are more useful than fully-automatic assault weapons in situations where you've got civilians and members of law enforcement all mixed up with spree killers. That is, unless you prefer higher police and civilian casualties.
It's not like the good guys' assault weapons fire somehow magically blocks the bad guys' assault weapons fire.
Kylyssa - In answer to one of your questions, yes, as a proud Army Vet I have fired thousands of rounds with full auto weapons.
I wasn't necessarily talking about automatic weapons when I asked the question. I'm not even sure that any Police Departments even issue weapons capable of full auto fire.
I was referring more to the armored vehicles that will allow them to get to the scene without being killed before they get there. Those were one of the things on the proposed ban list.
Thanks for the interesting comment and taking the time to stop by.
Obama is a mad man for limiting military style equipment for the police forces.
Or could this be just part of a greater plan of his?
I think it is a part of the great Jihad because Obama is intent on protecting the reputation of Islam. As president he doesn't seem to care about protecting American people judging by his words but mostly by his actions.
Hell, if Bruce Jenner can keep his wiener and be a woman under the Obama administration, then the police can have military-style equipment and be unprotected while engaging in force. Yeah, that's about the mentality! So! Maybe the first lady has a wiener and Obama doesn't have an army protecting him after all. I think I'm starting to get it!
Pardon me, please, sometimes my humor is dry.
There are already way too many people with guns they don't handle correctly. No doubt you are a responsible guy. The same cannot be said for all gun owners/users, police included. I fail to see how giving police more powerful weapons can be a good thing. In my opinion, gun ownership should be scaled down.
I have no doubt there are guns in the hands of people who are a danger to themselves and others. I would be completely in favor of requiring safety and proficiency training for those who have never owned a gun. Many states require this training for youth that want a hunting license and I am also in favor of that.
But in this case we are talking about local law enforcement having to face trained terrorists as first responders. They should be armed better than the bad guys.
To clarify, Poolman, I mean law enforcement should not be banned from carrying military weapons.
The Police Departments of this nation are first responders in the war on terror, the gang battles, hunts for fugitives, and other heinous acts committed against the American public. They certainly deserve to be equipped to handle these situations quickly and concisely - now I'm not advocating for a .50 cal to be mounted on a squad car, but certainly tactical body armor, communications, and vehicles are a must.
by Thomas Byers 5 years ago
Would You Give Up Your Guns To Protect American Children?Other than guns for hunting and pistols for protection would you have a problem with giving up all military style weapons to protect the children of America. Is there any reason to have military style weapons. Is there any reason for a...
by Mike Russo 13 months ago
Ask the 59 people who were killed and the 525 people who were wounded and all of those who were traumatized by this horrific event, if we need gun control. Why does any civilian need access to assault weapons? The problem is the mentally ill are an unknown quantity until after they commit the...
by Marcy Goodfleisch 14 months ago
Do you believe there should be tighter gun control laws?Should there be laws against selling or owning some types of guns? What do you think?
by movingout 6 years ago
In my opinion, yes! Should gun ownership be banned? NO Do people have the right to defend themselves and have hunting guns? Yes Should the average American be able to purchase assault weapons? No in my opinion! I see no reason to own a High powered assualt weapon.
by Credence2 6 years ago
Somewhere within the tapestry of recent history a determination was made that fully automatic sub machine guns like the Thompson could not be obtained by the private citizen for self defense. These were the weapons of choice for mobsters of the twenties and for time, beyond. Conservatives have...
by SEXYLADYDEE 5 years ago
Do you support a universal ban on military & assault "like" weapons for non military individuals?Do you believe that only the military needs assault "type" guns? And that "non military" personal use gun purchases should have access to bullet clips with a maximum of...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|