If one does a search on information regarding banning Police Departments from having Military Type equipment and weapons, You will come up with pages of info on this topic.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=co … +equipment
With the terrorist attacks in Paris, and most recently San Bernardino, Ca., is banning Military Type equipment from our Police still a wise thing to do? It is obvious that ISIS and other Terrorist organizations are well armed and our local Police will always be the first responders to these type of attacks. I also believe that we will be seeing more of these type incidents in the near future.
It is my opinion that our Police should be armed and trained as well as, or better than, the enemy they must deal with. Terrorist activity on our own soil is not something we are accustomed to but we need to be prepared.
I would be interested in your own opinions on this subject.
It really depends on the police department and whether or not the particular cops are trustworthy and very well trained. I say this as someone whose dad was a cop and a Cold-War survivalist.
No matter how well you are trained, there's a greater danger of having an accident with a fully-automatic assault rifle. You can't just hand one to an average cop and expect his previous training with regular rifles and handguns to keep him and innocent bystanders safe.
Actual soldiers generally use automatic weapons in war zones, places where innocent civilians and soldiers who die due to "friendly" fire don't matter much to those in charge. If you've fired one, you know it isn't easy to be accurate with it, even if you use tightly controlled bursts. Professional soldiers almost never use their assault rifles on full auto. It's what you give people who'll never be sharp-shooters to point in a general direction and hope they hit something due to rate of fire.
People highly trained in the use of handguns and sniper rifles are more useful than fully-automatic assault weapons in situations where you've got civilians and members of law enforcement all mixed up with spree killers. That is, unless you prefer higher police and civilian casualties.
It's not like the good guys' assault weapons fire somehow magically blocks the bad guys' assault weapons fire.
Kylyssa - In answer to one of your questions, yes, as a proud Army Vet I have fired thousands of rounds with full auto weapons.
I wasn't necessarily talking about automatic weapons when I asked the question. I'm not even sure that any Police Departments even issue weapons capable of full auto fire.
I was referring more to the armored vehicles that will allow them to get to the scene without being killed before they get there. Those were one of the things on the proposed ban list.
Thanks for the interesting comment and taking the time to stop by.
Obama is a mad man for limiting military style equipment for the police forces.
Or could this be just part of a greater plan of his?
I think it is a part of the great Jihad because Obama is intent on protecting the reputation of Islam. As president he doesn't seem to care about protecting American people judging by his words but mostly by his actions.
Hell, if Bruce Jenner can keep his wiener and be a woman under the Obama administration, then the police can have military-style equipment and be unprotected while engaging in force. Yeah, that's about the mentality! So! Maybe the first lady has a wiener and Obama doesn't have an army protecting him after all. I think I'm starting to get it!
Pardon me, please, sometimes my humor is dry.
There are already way too many people with guns they don't handle correctly. No doubt you are a responsible guy. The same cannot be said for all gun owners/users, police included. I fail to see how giving police more powerful weapons can be a good thing. In my opinion, gun ownership should be scaled down.
I have no doubt there are guns in the hands of people who are a danger to themselves and others. I would be completely in favor of requiring safety and proficiency training for those who have never owned a gun. Many states require this training for youth that want a hunting license and I am also in favor of that.
But in this case we are talking about local law enforcement having to face trained terrorists as first responders. They should be armed better than the bad guys.
To clarify, Poolman, I mean law enforcement should not be banned from carrying military weapons.
The Police Departments of this nation are first responders in the war on terror, the gang battles, hunts for fugitives, and other heinous acts committed against the American public. They certainly deserve to be equipped to handle these situations quickly and concisely - now I'm not advocating for a .50 cal to be mounted on a squad car, but certainly tactical body armor, communications, and vehicles are a must.
by Mike Russo 6 years ago
Ask the 59 people who were killed and the 525 people who were wounded and all of those who were traumatized by this horrific event, if we need gun control. Why does any civilian need access to assault weapons? The problem is the mentally ill are an unknown quantity until after they commit the...
by movingout 11 years ago
In my opinion, yes! Should gun ownership be banned? NO Do people have the right to defend themselves and have hunting guns? Yes Should the average American be able to purchase assault weapons? No in my opinion! I see no reason to own a High powered assualt weapon.
by Credence2 11 years ago
Somewhere within the tapestry of recent history a determination was made that fully automatic sub machine guns like the Thompson could not be obtained by the private citizen for self defense. These were the weapons of choice for mobsters of the twenties and for time, beyond. Conservatives have...
by Mike Russo 7 years ago
It's because of the "Use of Force Model" that has been adopted by law enforcement from the military Many cops across the country have been trained in this use of force model. It works like this. A cop approaches a suspect and gives the suspect some type of order. If the...
by Marcy Goodfleisch 6 years ago
Do you believe there should be tighter gun control laws?Should there be laws against selling or owning some types of guns? What do you think?
by J Conn 6 years ago
The same party that says we should support the troops and law enforcement argues that we need to own semi-automatic weapons because we can't trust the troops and law enforcement.
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |