Did you know this fact?
Hillary maneuvered a deal to the Russians while Secretary of State along with Bill? The deal was essentially brokered by Hillary and was run through the Clinton Foundation using Canadian-backed contributions as a cover.
The deal allowed the Russian’s to maneuver their way into the Continental United States as part of a vast and extensive plan to mine Uranium ore out of states like Wyoming and Oregon.
According to the New York Times in 2015 “Several leaders of the Canadian mining industry who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.”
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
What exactly do these facts say to you?
This says two things:
A. Hillary cannot be trusted, both as a public official and as a person.
B. I WILL NOT or any of my family vote for such a double-tongued candidate for the Most-Powerful Office in The World.
My feelings exactly and what is so terrible is the news media do not cover her sins but keep so tight lipped many will be so shocked after they elect her, for just like first black, this 1st woman will be the downfall of our country.
Just want to say, you all keep saying the news media does not cover Hillary's sins, yet I have not read a single thing on these forums that I had not already known about. Where the heck did I hear about it?
Oh my gosh, the media!
Must be FoxNews, they really do have the news as it happens.
LOL, no, I wouldn't be caught dead watching Fox News.
Then you do not look at the truth. Or want to. But your choice, guess that is how we got where we are right now, people wanting to not know the truth.
That is fascinating you believe that. There have been multle studies showing that Fox News viewers are the least informed and most misinformed.
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-wa … all-2012-5
Of course lesser News channels will say that. All I know is we have four Americans killed in Benghazi and news nowhere was telling us what happened, days and weeks and no word until someone told me about Fox and they told me plenty and still do. They break into any show at the very minute something happens, how can you get any better than that? Facts speak for themselves and I don't need anyone to tell me where to hear it as it happens because I finally know. Too bad you won't know it as fast. Your choice.
In order to have a better understanding of what is going on, including the views of the opposition, it's important to have an objective news source plus opinion news from both camps. On TV, Fox News has a right slant and MSNBC has a left one. Editorial journalism is a good alternative. Keeping a balanced overview, helps make for a more intelligent decision. It's actually rare to agree with a candidate on every single issue.
I'm always amazed at how many people don't understand Fox News. It has a successful business strategy of appealing to people's conservative biases, which is why an overwhelming number of viewers are conservative Republicans.
Fox is not a news channel that seeks the truth. It provides reporting and commentary about the news with a conservative viewpoint. That's an important difference.
"The Fox News audience skews more ideological than that of its two main competitors.
"Fully, 60% of Fox News viewers describe themselves as conservative, compared with 23% who say they are moderate and 10% who are liberal, according to a 2012 survey by the Pew Research Center.
"By contrast, the ideological makeup of CNN viewers (32% conservative, 30% moderate, 30% liberal) and MSNBC viewers (32% conservative, 23% moderate, 36% liberal) is far more mixed."
Interesting that liberals not only believe in the fairy tale but that they also feel the need to tell others to do the same . Fox has media accuracy and integrity at least , I suggest the Huffington Post for you or maybe the other honest media rep , Jerry Springer !
How about this :
Hillary , while economically sleeping with wall street more than a drunken sailor in a house of ill repute , Decries the poor lost souls of the economically downtrodden . "Oh.... the children ,.... the minorities , the hungry!"
And you guys can't begin to see the hypocrisy.........Now that's real credibility !
Ahorseback, can you please post a fact from a credible source rather than rage against anyone who isn't a right-wing extremist?
Well then why should, if "we" are all civil-minded and want our country to start back on the right track, WHY elect Clinton?
Unfortunately, integrity is not a requirement for office. Neither candidate has been forthcoming. Here is a link to the Uranium One from the Annenberg Policy Center:http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-veto-power-for-clinton-on-uranium-deal/
I read the article in your link and it says that Hillary did not have the power alleged in this question. That at best she could have forced it to the President but didn't. Ain't propaganda grand!
You are correct that she could have sent it to the President as could any of the other on the committee:
"The fact is, Clinton was one of nine voting members on the foreign investments committee, which also includes the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, the attorney general, and representatives from two White House offices — the United States Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (Separately, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission needed to approve (and did approve) the transfer of two uranium recovery licenses as part of the sale.)"
Did you read that she did get the millions? I think she will have to answer, her and Bill, she does not qualify to run in my opinion and it is not right she is above the law.
It was to make the Clinton's richer, no doubt about it and the Dems and Republicans are up to their eyeballs in dirty get rich quick deals is why they don't want a Donald in the middle of their muck to bring some fairness to the people for a change. I never liked him and I know he is full of himself but I believe he wants what we want. It is our only hope right now that I can see.
How about a Libertarian? They're getting into the game now.
Yes they are MizB and I could easily be one of them not satisfied with either side but I think we have to be logical and well that is just a wasted vote we can ill afford at such a critical time. .
Leftists are excellent at ignoring fact , and listening to the double -speak and apparently forgetting the opposite points Hillary's continually made before , Never expect the left to hold their own hypocrisy at check , they do not understand that there is only one set of truths !
With all due respect, fact-seekers come from all parties.It has more to do with intelligence than political persuasion. Both sides are equally good at putting up slanted, fear-mongering rubbish. Politicians are basically corrupt, and Mr. Trump is not exactly exuding integrity either. For an ultra-conservative take on his agenda, check out the National Review and find out why many Republicans are bailing from the GOP. We need a real leader instead of delusion behind a monotonous tagline. I honestly can't stomach either candidate, and this is a very sad race indeed.
Well , I agree , I said from the beginning Trump will never get there , I said I wouldn't vote for him , Now I will hold my nose while voting for a man I don't like who can probably do a better job than Hillary , WHO SHOULD be incredibly experienced and seems to have learned nothing BUT how to attain mass riches while selling her Job influence while drawing a U.S paycheck .
The hypocrisy seems to know no bounds in the Clinton foundation .
TEN PERCENT to Charity ?
Well I think the people are speaking on this not the Republicans. They just want to go above the law. Trump won the nomination, end of story. Law. The way it should be.
I use to be left Ed and one day I said what is this? I guess I was one of those people just being what my parents were but I am sure if they were alive today they would drop them just as I did to know they kill babies and want me to pay for it and are corrupting our country faster than we can see what is happening and infiltrating our country with drugs, criminals and now Sharia Law and Muslims who shout death to America and they just love them and lie left and right to cover up their sins. Well, need I go on?
I don't quite like how the republicans are doing either but I hope they see the people speaking. We are tired of this corruption of the most wonderful place on earth...or so it was.
These names and numbers speak for themselves.
How about a few countries ?
AND JUST WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO , CHARITABLE--- % ----10% ?
I'm sorry. I somehow missed the source or sources for this fact. Can you provide it?
If it looks like a rat and smells like a rat why try to deny it? Here you go Kathleen and there are many more. Some that like to defend her too as if she did not get millions from them for any "bad" reasons but I have drank none of their Kool Aid and I have eyes to see and ears to hear.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/ca … .html?_r=0
Each morning for years I have channel surfed news outlets . I used to , in the eighties and nineties ,almost totally believe in the neutrality of CNN . Once USA today was my paper , CBS news with Dan Rather , I have always been a news junkie . Yet, today as I surf still , I find only one 'fair and balanced " balance- being the key source .
Fox news , although obviously right of center , IS the most balanced in media accuracy and integrity ! Is it my only source ? No. but given the alternatives , it has simply the most complete covering of ALL political spin. And lets face it , today most breathe in political spin . Use your own head ! I will never let media make up my mind.
The media today is a total joke and obviously bought and paid for. I have heard there are a couple more besides Fox that will report the truth but I am just so thankful to Fox for clearing the Benghazi blackout for me and there is so much to choose from. I mean they always have the opposition which I am not so cray about but that shows just how fair they are.
Not a day goes by I don't tune into Fox and I bet the guys would really like it! lol
Jackie , Hi , I have also been listening to Breitbart Radio on Sirius Radio , they also have tv . news and although Glen Beck is on there , so is Andrew Wilkow and some other very neutral people. Great sources for thought !
I will try to check that out Ed, I think I even have a built in link to that...if not I will find it. Thanks.
Wise advice to not let the media make up your mind. I choose to read news stories and editorials while my husband prefers TV. I agree that Fox News digs into the political spin more than the mainstream media, and while it is a good starting point, it's still too slanted for my taste.
And they all are too slanted , I believe that there is a unwritten conspiracy to sensationalize non-issues to hide the lack of unaccountability of Congress and senate in their actual responsibilities . The Media and Government are a lot closer than we think .
You see , by that response, I understand completely that you are biased and brainwashed , that makes you part of the problem , not the solution !.......:-]
by C E Clark 6 years ago
Why are Republicans in denial about Donald Trump and his many scams and lies?When someone engages contractors and agrees to pay them and then goes bankrupt on that promise it is basically a lie. When a man has a wife AND a mistress, he is certain to be lying to one, or more likely both of...
by John Wilson 6 years ago
Scott Adams of Dilbert fame says leaked Trump tape not important (goo.gl/K0aASq) Do you agree?The basic gist of what Adams says is this: 1) Most knew trump was like this before the tapes 2) Compared to bill's sexcapades (and hillary's responses to the women abused women) Trump has plenty of fodder...
by Lela Cargill 6 years ago
The right-wing camp is constantly calling for Hillary's imprisonment, even though they have spent 30+ years and countless MILLIONS of tax payer dollars to 'investigate' her, ridicule her, accuse her of wrongdoing, insinuate that she is 'crooked', a murderer, a liar, a cheat, and more. The...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 6 years ago
There are people who strongly contend that the witch hunt against Hillary Clinton regarding past scandals & e-mail escapades are because she is a woman. They maintain that Hillary Clinton is more than qualified to be President of the United States. They maintain that Hillary Clinton...
by Stacie L 6 years ago
Scandal: A new investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton took in at least $100 million from Middle East leaders. Can such a financially and ethically compromised candidate truly function as our nation’s leader?The investigation by the Daily Caller News Foundation has uncovered a...
by Susie Lehto 5 years ago
I started out reading about this on Infowars...that the MSM is throwing Bill Clinton under the bus. So, I followed some of links posted and low and behold its appears to be true. Great article by the Atlantic: NOV 13, 2017"Bill Clinton: A Reckoning" --- read about...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|