We need altruistic attitude towards the poverty stricken but not wars.

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (18 posts)
  1. divakar3368 profile image80
    divakar3368posted 16 months ago

    A third world war can be so fatal. USA should step away from attacking North Korea in order to avert further global tragedies.If there is a collective effort to wipe the tears of the poor across the world, how happy the world can be?

    1. Live to Learn profile image79
      Live to Learnposted 16 months agoin reply to this

      I agree, in theory. Definitely not interested in backing a war effort but wiping the tears from the poor isn't something North Korea is interested in doing. If they were, they'd be working on that instead of pouring so much money into developing nuclear weapons.

    2. rhamson profile image76
      rhamsonposted 16 months agoin reply to this

      The poor are the least of concern for those who beat the war drum. The greed and lust for power is what the benefactors of it are interested in and not the lowly who will be pumped up with patriotism and bravado to blindly fight it for them instead of the fortunate who shield themselves behind their own wealth. War is politics by other means and politics is control by those with a lust for power.

      As far as the idiot in North Korea, somebody needs to put a bullet in his head.

      1. Live to Learn profile image79
        Live to Learnposted 16 months agoin reply to this

        I hope you don't have a career in the diplomatic corps.

        1. rhamson profile image76
          rhamsonposted 16 months agoin reply to this

          smile

  2. FatFreddysCat profile image96
    FatFreddysCatposted 16 months ago

    Quote of the day.

  3. MyDeadCircus profile image72
    MyDeadCircusposted 16 months ago

    Agreed. We can't afford to feed people, but we have war money. Amazing how low humanity has sunk... and we call this "civilized"...

  4. divakar3368 profile image80
    divakar3368posted 16 months ago

    Thanks for the comments guys. There can amicable solutions for most of the small scale issues or else let them to be continued in the moniscule ways, but if something that leads to a fatal war, everyone has to bear the brunt of the same. North korea is definitely defiant and generally everyone thinks the country should be dealt with an iron hand. Nonethless, when we think of the undesirable impacts of it aftermath a war, i am coiled back not because of fear but a kind of pragmatic perspective.
    Lol

  5. Sustainable Sue profile image97
    Sustainable Sueposted 16 months ago

    Also agree. How long have we had sanctions on N. Korea, i.e. how long have we been blocking them from developing their own economy? Is it no wonder they're fed up and posturing with threats of violence? We bring all this war stuff on ourselves by the way we handle other countries whose practices we disagree with/can't benefit from.

    1. rhamson profile image76
      rhamsonposted 16 months agoin reply to this

      I agree. smile

      1. wilderness profile image97
        wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

        On the other hand, from the other viewpoint and side of the fence, how long have we (and others) had sanctions on NK, trying to "peaceably" force them to become a respected member of the international community?  And to date it is a total, abysmal failure as they produce the largest army in the world, grossly mistreat their own citizens and constantly make threats of violence.

  6. Sustainable Sue profile image97
    Sustainable Sueposted 16 months ago

    The number of people in a military doesn't mean much if they don't have the equipment and finances to back them up. The U.S. is the best equipped, by far, and also has the biggest budget by far - like $610 billion compared to the next biggest spender (China at $216 billion). Frankly, I don't see why we're so flipped about spending even more on the military. Why don't we use some of that money to help countries grow, instead? Maybe expand the US Peace Corps. THAT would help America look great again!

    1. wilderness profile image97
      wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

      I disagree; the size of a military is a good indication of the underlying philosophy of a country or it's leaders.

      We have a choice: equip our soldiers the absolute best we can and save their lives as they protect us or give those resources (money) away to other countries whose leaders will not allow it to reach those in need.

      1. rhamson profile image76
        rhamsonposted 16 months agoin reply to this

        "whose leaders will not allow it to reach those in need."

        In some if not many cases we place those leaders in charge or worse yet depose the former allowing the latter to seize power. It is not a one way choice. Our military solutions are largely reactions from failed diplomatic solutions.

        1. wilderness profile image97
          wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

          I would have to say that ALL wars are failed diplomatic solutions.  Even those such as the invasion of Kuwait - Iraq wanted the land (and oil) and Kuwait was so unreasonable as to not want to give it up.  Just couldn't "compromise" there at all! big_smile

          1. rhamson profile image76
            rhamsonposted 16 months agoin reply to this

            No but we surely placed Sadat Hussein in charge in one of our many orchestrated coups didn't we? The middle east is sprinkled with much of our twisted leadership installed debacles. The invasion of Kuwait was inevitable as was ISIS taking control of Northern Iraq and the Syrian Rebel disaster. Our great big military is doing what to stop that? Bomb everyone? roll

            1. wilderness profile image97
              wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

              Yep!  We keep trying (while keeping our interests in the pot, too) and keep failing.  Problem is that all the world doesn't accept our way of life or government.

  7. Sustainable Sue profile image97
    Sustainable Sueposted 16 months ago

    Kuwait was part of Iraq until Europe and the US took it away in 1932. We wanted to control their oil supply and block Iraq's access to the ocean. Read the following comments for several takes on the Kuwait/Iraqi conflict. I've read many of the assertions on this site in other places too, including a detailed description of Iraq's questing the US about an invasion and the US tacitly OK'ing it. In total this situation reads to me like an ongoing attempt of the Kuwait/Europe/US faction to weaken Iraq and keep it that way.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Iraq-invade-Kuwait

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)