Do the majority of the population have the wisdom necessary to influence leadership decisions?
The majority of the population doesn't have the wisdom necessary to influence leadership decisions. We live in a "yes" culture for some, and a "me" culture for others; the latter offering nothing, and the former taking everything. Besides, the ability to be influenced requires the capacity to be other than self-interested -- which is antithetical to the current crop of political leadership on both sides of the aisle.
Absolutely not. In fact, I believe its the other way around. It seems to me that the public is more influenced by the spin and pandering of their elected officials. The majority of this country no longer seems to read or become familiar with issues, relying on political party talking points and the extreme media pundits because its easier than thinking for themselves. When you blindly accept decisions, you allow the wolves to guard the hen house. A population with Improved education levels and the implementation of term limits would go a long toward influencing governing decisions from the ground level.
Not only is the answer yes, but the vast majority of leadership is far less competent than the average Joe Schmuck.
Absolutely not, and this is by the designs of the rich, who do.
I say yes. Although Americans are pretty ignorant, they are not stupid. We are capable of knowing whether or not a decision will affect our personal freedoms. And that is generally what we worry about as citizens. When we shrug and say we are not wise enough to influence decisions in Washington, we are giving our paternalistic government carte blanche to create an Orwellian society. Was George W Bush wise enough to make decisions? He was our president after all. What if Sara Palin became Chief of State? Is she less-ignorant than the average American? Our richest and most powerful rulers are subjects of the same flawed educational system we are. Some learn how to understand the world, but most do not. They are more like movie stars than statesmen. I would go a step further and say abolish the House of Representatives in lieu of a national referendum on all issues: public spending, going to war, passing laws, etc. Why not?
by FitnezzJim 5 years ago
What should be the strongest influence on your Congressman?Results will be added to an article to compare how we believe representatives should perform and how we believe they do perform.Please select from: “We the Pople”, “Money”, "Deals”, “Political Party, or ...
by Brad Masters 2 years ago
Do you think that SCOTUS decisions should require more than a simple majority to decide a case.With a 5-4 decision, 4 SC justices are disregarded while a single vote decides the case. The decision becomes the law of the land, but does that even come close to resolving the issues underlying the...
by My Esoteric 2 years ago
Today (4/4/16) the Supreme Court unanimously threw out a challenge to the "one man, one vote" concept that was established in Court decisions from the 1960s. The Project on Fair Representation (PFR) in Texas. The question they raised is must redistricting be based on total...
by ptosis 6 years ago
"A constitutional amendment, which requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress (or a Convention under Article V of the Constitution) and ratification in three-fourths of all fifty states, would be required." - https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti … e/GZQtFSPVCheck out...
by Stump Parrish 7 years ago
Let me start this off with a NOTICE...I am posting my personal thoughts on an article I read personally. My opinions may, or may not be based on incomplete research, data and knowledge. This "SCREED" may be a little too "SCREEDY" for some and in my opinion, screed happens, deal...
by ptosis 2 years ago
What was the smallest USSC number in history? Right now there are 8 instead of the full nine? Has there ever been 7, 6 or 5? What if a second judge leaves or dies and there are only 7 and Republicans still refuse to comment or confirm an Presidential appointment? What if there were 4, 3, 2, 1 and...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|