I recently came to the conclusion that no new house should be built without solar power, and solar water heaters installed.
Currently solar power cells cost more per kilowatt hour than conventional power does.
But, what if the EPA manned up and pushed for new buildings to derive a certain percentage of their power from solar (or wind for you windy types)? Then builders would be forced to buy solar panels and new buildings would buy less electricity from regular(coal, nuclear, etc..) power companies because they would in a sense produce a certain amount of their own power, In our “free” market as the cost of solar panels went down, because of a higher demand, and prices per kilowatt hour went up at the power company, could this cause a shift towards alternative power?
Could the cost per solar panel go down due to increased revenues? I believe the healthy stream of money could advance the solar industry and bring us out of the dark ages of power production.
Increased demand increases price....not the other way around.
Increased demand does increase the price in the short run, But I’m thinking more in the long run where increased demand increased the price which causes manufacturers to increase production which puts more product on the market, at the same time increased demand causes more businesses to enter the market because of the possibility of profit….all this leads to an increase in supply which as you should know lowers the price, and the increase of competition leads to lower prices and/or better products…so you see…. <this portion left intentionally blank>
While what your saying has some truth to it, your starting out by artificially creating demand by having the government mandate it. This will therefore increase the price. Just like insurance. Sooner or later we will realize that you simply don't want the government in your house.
This is a great idea, but It's the silicon. The stuff is in higher and higher demand. Unless we have more plants for silicon, we will not be able to bring costs down for the average household.
The cost is a big hill to climb but we will need this source of energy for many reasons. Got to get past the cost of the technology.
Anytime you hear, "Let's have the government require..." hold on to your wallet and prepare for a likely F-up.
If the EPA can push the envelope with cars fuel economy why not other issues like home power consumption?
Most people are satisfied with the status quo, and only do the "right" thing when the "right" thing is the cheapest thing to do.
Take for example compact fluorescent lights. No one really used them until the price came down enough that their power savings actually outweighed the cost in a short time.
....I am getting too excited about the issue already haha, thanks for the reply....
I just think that if the government can push programs like cash for clunkers why not something similar for solar panels and wind electricity....I would turn in my old water heater for a solar water heater, I keep bringing up water heaters because apparently they use a good portion of your homes energy.
The market does that job, not the government.
Anything with a motor and heat elements, yes, hike up power consumption. Solar is good for lighter stuff whereas wind is good for the heavier stuff. I would least try to get solar and wind energy just for the appliances that hog the most power.
Solar not because the government says so because it's the most cost effective way to go.
If I had a job (poor college student here) I would buy a panel a month and eventually have a grid tied or possibly even a stand alone power system.
Do you use alternative power?
if you can support it, a solar panel or a windmill will pay for themselves over time. Do it because its good for you! If everyone who could afford one, had one it would reduce the cost of electricity over time. It would reduce the cost of solar panels over time. All with out government intervention.
Well, you are right...I've given it some thought and we should let it occur naturally. It would make things much more stable over time, and lets face it the cost of electricity is going up every year and the cost of solar panels are going down so it is happening, without the government.
I just can help wanting things to happen quickly…being American is a curse in that way, but at least I have conquered that whole not being able to admit you are wrong thing right?
Next stop patience.
Good for you, no amount of legislation will make you a better anything. Only you get to decide that. Too much legislation only gives the government more opportunity to judge you....and trust me, no one really wants judgement....or justice for that matter.
I'm jumping in late here, but I'd like to point out that sometimes the free market does need a nudge, such as government incentives, due to such things as near monopolies and entrenched infrastructure that resists innovation. Innovation can actually be spurred by government -- the space program is a good example. Many new materials (think plastics) that are in common use today were derived from research associated with the space program.
I'm just saying that we cannot always rely on the free market to save us from our own bad habits. Sometimes the free market needs a poke.
But exactly what’s make solar panels expensive? Perhaps it’s because manufacturers are not able to reach break-even points with sales.
If many people were to use solar energy instead of electricity the government will lose taxes on electricity. And because they must have the taxes, then they will have to go to the manufacturers of solar panels for the shotfall.
Asking for the government to demand installation of solar panels in new homes is asking for trouble before it troubles you.
The government should be requiring that consumers or polluters pay the "external" costs of their use of products which pollute, damage the air or water or contribute to global climate change--electricity from coal fired power plants, gas guzzling motor vehicles and so forth.
It's not that simple!There are still many technical challenges to overcome in order to make solar viable besides the cost which is significant. The return on investment with solar is more than 30 years!
What we should do is remove the regulatory barriers that add cost and discourage the building and use of nuclear power. It is today the only green source of power that can be employed right now! Modern technology has come a long way and these plants are safer than ever before!
The use of Nuclear power definitely will help. Its the quickest way off of foriegn oil. The only issue I'm still unsure about is what to do with large energy companies who buy up emerging technologies and shelve them....This has happened in both the Auto and Energy sectors. I'm sure that it happens elsewhere as well.
It's not just the solar panels, but a way to store the energy from the sonar panels so that you can have energy on demand.
Solar power is a great solution! Yes the power might cost more with a long return on investment now, but if you consider that with the cost of fuel going up do you think that the electric company is not going to pass those cost on! Any one with a head knows that you have to raise the cost to cover the increase.
However, I have never gotten a bill from the sun for using it at all. With the increase in the fuel costs you know that return on investment will come closer and closer each year.
As far as the cost though if you build your own solar power system you can save a tremendous amount of money reducing your return on investment even faster!
It's actually the rare metals like iridium. China cornered the market a few years ago driving down prices putting us and Canada out of the rare metals business.
Now they aren't happy with the price and have ceased production trying to raise it back up.
This is supposed to be against trade agreements but it seems like they do what they want.
You may notice this increase more easily through the price of energy efficient lightbulbs.
In my state every town that has a river connecting to the ocean must either build a denitrification plant and pollution monitoring station or pay money to the DEP.
by Xenonlit 6 years ago
Should America take oil and gas subsidies and apply them to alternative power and fuel resources?Why American stubbornly continues to support a fossil fuel industry that is swimming in money from inflated fuel prices is a confounding issue.
by Aya Katz 6 years ago
Which alternative energy source is more efficient and cheaper to maintain: solar panels or windmills?
by Makemoneycashflow 8 years ago
Introduction to Solar Energy Solar Power is a form of energy and is generated by the sun. This kind of energy can be harnessed using cells and converted into electricity or thermal energy. It is the earthâ��s most available energy source and can easily be taken advantage of. If you live in a...
by lime light power 6 years ago
Would you install solar or a wind at your home if it cost the same as power from the utility?
by Rambler1 6 years ago
I have considered converting my house to solar power. My question is it worth it and how long is the payback
by MikeNV 8 years ago
"WASHINGTON – The government is handing out nearly $2 billion for new solar plants that President Barack Obama says will create thousands of jobs and increase the use of renewable energy sources.The two companies that will receive the money from the president's $862 billion economic stimulus...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|