Should Ron Paul run as an independent?
This man has a huge following and nothing to loose. Should he run as an independent in the 2012 election? It may show the "parties" that other contenders are out there and capable of delivering "real change".
The trouble with that is most people feel that if you vote for Ron Paul then you waste a vote against the candidate that you may really not want to have in there. So a lot of people would rather vote for a less liked candidate then chance getting some one in they really dislike.
I thought he was an independent. Yeah he should but I don't think he wins
It is probably best for the Country overall if Ron Paul chooses not to run, but instead trades his endorsement of Romney for Republican support of key elements of the Paul platform. Politics may not work like that anymore, but this year more than any, it appears imperative for the Country to Unite behind a single candidate.
If he was that popular then he would have beat Romney for the nomination. He consistently came in last in most states. His popularity is internet based, not reality based. With that said, I don't care if he does run as an independent. I would rather see a more mainstream candidate run as an independent that actually has a chance at making a race against the two big money candidates. Im not sure who that person should be, but I bet that there is some eccentric billionaire out there. RuPaul comes off as the crazy uncle that wants to legalize dope for most people. It would be hard for him to gain any traction now. Everyone already knows who he is, and America has decided that we do not like him.
I don't think he should be running at all. He has a miniscule following compared to the major candidates. Having nothing to lose, is not a valid reason for running.
His political platform aside, I fail to see why anyone would vote for a man so old he probably would not live through a term. So, you have to look instead at the running mate...and ask yourself if you want THAT person to be the president...because that's what would happen.
So, all he's really doing, is acting as a "spoiler" and making the vote split more complicated than it needs to be.
by RVDaniels6 years ago
Do you like Congressman Ron Paul and would you vote for him?Do you believe Ron Paul can be a good President?
by David Stillwell5 years ago
As voters, Why are we excepting either Romney or Obama as presidential candidates for 2012.The argument over leadership and leadership abilities, lost job, jobs sent overseas, economic policy, foreign policy, national...
by Dave Mathews6 years ago
I hate politics. I hate all politicians. I see all politicians as "Legalized Mafia" or Legalized crooks, someone who through "laws" legal or otherwise find a way to dip into your pocket or purse to...
by Man from Modesto5 years ago
Do you research candidates before voting? How could anyone vote for Romney or Obama?I wrote articles about a local Modesto mayoral election in 2012. Though I was on the first Google results page for the biggest search...
by Jason Menayan6 years ago
It strikes me that there are 2 distinct types of people voting in the Republican primaries and caucuses: partisans and libertarians.The partisans are about 80%; they might have their favorite candidate, but in the end,...
by Moderndayslave6 years ago
Cris Wallace of faux news stating ,If Ron Paul wins Iowa caucus " It doesn't count" What? If it doesn't count, why do they have them at all? Can anyone explain this?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeF4sDjE...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.