Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."
So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?
Probably the same congressmen who support the death penalty and take bribes from the death-dealing arms industry.
Now the Democrats are fascist, you are comical.
Now go look up the word "fascist." I think you will find it appropriate.
You shure r funny tho. Were you making a point as well? Because i lost it.
Actually, I think they are questioning whether or not tax dollars should be used to pay for it.....
The same tax dollars that are used to buy nukular weapons and invade Iraq and bail the banks out?
I see what you mean.....
Do you? It would seem that your logic only encourages wastefull spending. In other words if the government spends on something you disagree with then they MUST spend on something you agree with. Or even worse, no request for funding can be denied. To what end will that lead?
Again, they were only asking for a vote to amend funding. merely asking a question makes them facist?
yes. I see they do not question the money spent on corporations who supply weapons to the government Inc. I really suggest you guys go buy decent dictionaries and look up the word fascist. It might make communication somewhat easier.
Wasteful? Not sure how you came to that conclusion either. I was suggesting these are hypocritical scum bags who are quite happy to see as many dead Iraqi babies as it takes as long as Exxon makes a large profit, but have a"moral" opinion on spending tax money on abortion because .....
Do you think health care reform should involve federal funding for procedures performed for socio-economic rather than medical reasons?
It's simple. The Constitution defends the rights of ALL INDIVIDUALS to the pursuit of happiness. Now that includes women, but at some point that fetus becomes an individual and as such deserves the protections granted it under the constitution.
Funny how Pelosi gets to decide on what Congress may or may not address. Used to be any congressman could introduce any issue he deemed to be of importance to the American people.
Your right, although it normally takes more than one....however it apears there are 38. Seems more than enough to open a debate.
I hope American's of all political persuasions are paying close attention to all of this nonsense. Practically all of the sitting congress should get a hard look at re-election time.
I actually saw a bumper sticker the other day that shouted,
"PELOSI FOR POPE!"
First I'd heard she was even Catholic....
I don't think we should allow Mark to completely side track this thread like he has done to so many other threads.
The reason why I started it is to consider a universal health care plan if federal funding is not used for socio-economic reasons such as abortion or euthanasia.
What do you think?
Seeing there are so many people without health insurance in the US is it worth considering universal health care if it just deals with medical reasons?
by fishskinfreak2008 8 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100311/ap_ … e_overhaulIt's gonna be a dogfight.
by SparklingJewel 7 years ago
This link has good information on this subject. I haven't read it all yet. It is from a conservative news site.http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.vi … eId=106694
by SparklingJewel 8 years ago
I truly want to know if these are valid reasons...or are they perspective on what "could" happen, or just totally absurd possibilities. If you have proof to validate or deny these reasonings, I genuinely would like to hear them?Here are just some of them, from a conservatives view: ...
by Poppa Blues 8 years ago
The bill contains 500 billion in NEW taxes. These taxes will affect everyone, not just the rich. In fact if you need a medical device, you will now have to pay a tax for it! Yes a tax on things like defibrillators, wheel chairs, fillings, and stents, so your hospital bills will now be higher! Here...
by fishskinfreak2008 8 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100308/ap_ … h_overhaul"President Barack Obama accused insurance companies of placing profits over people and said Republicans ignored long-festering problems when they held power as he sought to build support Monday for swift passage of...
by Leslie McCowen 7 years ago
"On a conference call with reporters and bloggers this afternoon, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) characterized the GOP’s recent legislative effort to restrict access to abortion and contraception as “the most comprehensive and radical assault on women’s health in our life time,” promising to...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|