How will Republicans view the Olympics salute to National Health Care?
Obviously the United Kingdom loves their National Health Care. Doctors and nurses made a stellar performance in the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. So, how will another country's love for socialized medicine play out with the republicans and FOX News in the USA?
we do, we do, my brother was ill yesterday, took him down doctors for free, then got free meds from the doc, i love it, but i think in truth it is unsustainable. i think with the american budget sky high i think it is more of an ideal, and another drain on the government budget
They can love their National Health Care. They pay through the nose for it. Most will tell you they don't but that's because much of it is taken out of gross pay before they even get their check. I'd rather keep more of my own money and choose how it's spent than pay the government to make those decisions for me. The government, any and not just the US government, has shown over and over that they do not know how to be frugal with the citizens' money nor spend it wisely.
have you talked to most brits? If that were the case they would have worked to overthrow their NHS and it appears to me they celebrate it.
Until you find yourself in need of medical attention. Then you will cry about how you are being discriminated against, because you are not poor!
@ChristinS In 2009, they paid approximately 2000 pounds each man, woman and child. Plus, they pay value added taxes on goods nationwide. These are just facts and you can find them easily on the internet. Most were born into it; they know nothing else
In 2004, the cost of uncompensated care for the uninsured was estimated to be around $41 billion - tax payers bear that burden, so we pay too, because we've never known anything different.
I'd much rather pay 2000 pounds a year and get the treatment that the Brits get than what I do now. Through my employer, I pay $7200 a year for health insurance - and I still have to pay $50-$300 each visit for routine preventive care.
They also pay value added taxes. Check the price of goods there compared to here. And that isn't $2800 pounds per family, that is 2800 pounds PER family member, including children.
They will find a way to spin it as "propaganda" and not true feelings of the people. In my eyes, if it was so awful - we'd hear their citizens in an uproar about it, trying to have it overthrown for our system. Funny I don't see that happening - so in my mind, this means the British actually like having a system of medicine that works for everyone. We pay out the nose already for the uninsured - I wish more people would be rational and logical. Hospitals write off those debts and tax payers fund it already - Private insurance companies raise rates through the roof because no one is regulating them properly. I have never understood why the basic human right of health needs to be a for-profit deal. There are plenty of countries with socialized medicine who have a much healthier population than we do. I suspect Fox etc. won't want facts to inconvenience their position though.
remember there is only only party, the capitalists, that is why, very sad though. I do agree health insurance should only be for micro profits, I do not think a man should pay 10K to have his finger reattached, that is disgusting.
No, they've created an entitlement society. If you try to take away what they consider "free" they get in an uproar. They pay value added taxes on almost all goods, check the prices for things versus here.
Actually, it was more a tribute to that one hospital. But, people in the UK defend the NHS regardless of any problems.
Should we really care about what Fox News plays out on UK's NHS? Our health care system has been unregulated and been privately run all these years - has it resulted in lowering costs, improving our health and are people generally satisfied with what's available? We score very poorly on all these points. Why then grudge the brits for their system which has stood the test of time and with which they are satisfied?
Does anybody care what others think? Good and bad exists in NHC. In the US, there aren't enough doctors for.the plan. Somehow the kinks will work themselves out. Fox News and political parties will move on to other items eventually. If we can avoid going broke and people get healthier, maybe it will have been worth it. I have a friend who makes public places turn off Fox News. lol
My wife lived there for years and the notion that they love it is somewhat a fallacy. Anyone who can afford to, which is not many, buys their own private insurance. The younger segment of the population love it because it's free and they rarely need to utilize services. The elderly however are routinely denied needed services by the rationing bodies. The problem is the those in need are in the minority, so there is little chance of democratic change. I always find this debate interesting. With all of our flaws in our system, we lead the world in survival rate of the treatment of virtually every major disease, from cancer to heart disease, AIDS treatment etc. Anywhere else in the world you're statistically more likely to die.
Our problem in our health care system is an economic one in terms of cost, not quality. The notion that the Gov't can bring down cost without quality suffering has never worked anywhere in any industry. Since the creation of Medicare in 1965 costs have skyrocketed in a disproportionate ration to overal inflation. Yet things like cosmetic surgery which have virtually no gov't or private insurance connections have become, more advanced, more available to the general public and less expensive. And in most cases the patient deals with the Dr directly with no third party involved.
by funnebone 10 years ago
I hear the term national healthcare being thrown around and I would like to know, both as a Doctor and as a human, who would pay for this and what would it pay? For those of you unfamiliar with our current government healthcare system ie medicare and medicaid, they are awful programs that doctors...
by screaming 6 years ago
If you found yourself with no insurance, unable to afford private insurance, and (you, your spouse, your children, your parents, or your grandkids) were in need of medical treatment. Would you be against Obamacare?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 months ago
Do you believe that the nuisance known as Obamacare will finally be repealed? Why? Why not?I believe that the government SHOULD NOT be in private affairs such as health care. I believe that health care is the sole responsibility of the individual. If individuals want health care,...
by SparklingJewel 6 years ago
This legislation was covertly run through the system over the objections of at least half of the American people. The president justified it by saying that it didn’t raise our taxes. Now the Supreme Court has confirmed that’s exactly what the law does. The entire justification for the law is...
by lady_love158 7 years ago
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/medicare … um=twitterDoes anyone really believe that government health care will be cheaper and better than what we have and without fraud waste and abuse??
by fishskinfreak2008 8 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100308/ap_ … h_overhaul"President Barack Obama accused insurance companies of placing profits over people and said Republicans ignored long-festering problems when they held power as he sought to build support Monday for swift passage of...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|