jump to last post 1-6 of 6 discussions (10 posts)

How would you define nihilism?

  1. ytsenoh profile image85
    ytsenohposted 4 years ago

    How would you define nihilism?

  2. sparkleyfinger profile image93
    sparkleyfingerposted 4 years ago

    I would take the Latin term nihil, meaning nothing. Essentially niaism is the belief in nothing. No morals, no religion..... Nothing. Wikipedia describes it well..... You could just google it.

    1. sparkleyfinger profile image93
      sparkleyfingerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      And my spelling is abysmal due to auto type in the iPad, sorry!

  3. RBJ33 profile image60
    RBJ33posted 4 years ago

    Reality does not really exist - denial of established authority - a sense that everything is unreal.

  4. Brandon Tart profile image60
    Brandon Tartposted 4 years ago

    Recently I listened to a Quantum Physicist speak about reality, and how it is now understood as being completely misunderstood.  When asked in the documentary about the nature of existence, he noted the science is now bordering on philosophy, and extended the notion that the physical universe seems to present more ontological problems than once realized until Quantum Entanglement and Electron Orbits were measured.  That every atom in the universe, specifically the electrons, is "aware" of what every other electron is doing and where it is.  Entangled, in that the measured electron motion influences the motion of other electrons no matter how far apart the atoms are from one another.  The mystery is the "HOW" this can be so.  If two gears are torn apart from one another, their motion no longer influences the the motion of the other gear.  But the opposite is true for atoms, whose motion in separate locations isolated from one another still influences the measurable motion of other atoms. 

    Now, back to your question, the QPhysicist in his discussion said to the interviewer, "try to imagine nothingness", adding to that that our existence is far more probable to be than not to be.  I believe that nihilism is impossible to define, as science with its new ontological problems put forth is "geared" toward causality, not a-causality.  The big bang presents a problem that "time" at the moment of the big bang held to no Universal Law... real chaos existed.  The closest thing to nihilism that I can think of was the moment that Ex Nihilo, Nihil Fit. 

    Be it real, or not, it is still measurable, the universe.  But my thoughts can be measured as being, or, having being.  In spite of all, there is still thought.  Moreover, there is the thought that all is thought, and if so, who is thinking... who thinks, therefore -- I AM?  A thing to be considered is how thought does make manifest, and thoughtlessness encourages no thing, influences no thing and is in fact probably, nothing at all.  Whether we are thinking or not, the mind is always involved as the observer, even if only it observes its own thoughts.  To the schizophrenic, its thoughts are very much real to the extent that they are born witness to.  While we cannot see the manifestations of the schizoid mind, we can say emphatically that what is perceived is very real to the one encumbered by such a state.  In a universe of either good, or evil, it is both nihilistic and not -- schizoid, as it were.  Nil as it seems

    1. Brandon Tart profile image60
      Brandon Tartposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Id920P5eg0A
      A song -- Nothing as it Seems

    2. Mike Marks profile image74
      Mike Marksposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      yea, it seems to me that existence exists because nothing(ness) is impossible...

    3. ytsenoh profile image85
      ytsenohposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      What a great response.  Thank you for the elements of interest you incorporated in your comment.

  5. Bryan W Cole profile image60
    Bryan W Coleposted 4 years ago

    Watch The Big Lebowski (if you haven't already), they touch on the subject briefly and poke fun at it.

  6. profile image0
    Old Empresarioposted 4 years ago

    I get my sense of it from Ivan Turgenev's novel, Fathers and Sons. It's a general practice of only engaging in things that are concrete and pragmatic; with a total absence of an appreciation of art or beauty, of emotion, passion, faith, creed, or any sort of reverence for anything other than that mild curiousity toward practical science and discovery.

 
working