Should issues be proven to be constitutional BEFORE they reach the voter ballot?

Jump to Last Post 1-9 of 9 discussions (14 posts)
  1. IDONO profile image78
    IDONOposted 6 years ago

    Should issues be proven to be constitutional BEFORE they reach the voter ballot?

    It seems that the voice of the people don't mean much anymore. We vote yea or nay on issues, then many times the result is appealed as unconstitutional. Maybe these issues should go before the Supreme Court before it goes on a ballot instead of people voting , then finding out that trip to the booth meant nothing.

  2. conradofontanilla profile image76
    conradofontanillaposted 6 years ago

    no. a candidate is listed even before a case is revolved by the supreme court. that gives the benefit of the doubt to the candidate. in principle, the supreme court is the highest court in the land. if the commission on elections did not include the candidate's name that is tantamount to having decided the case against the candidate.

  3. wilderness profile image97
    wildernessposted 6 years ago

    If it weren't for needing another 10 or 20 Supreme Courts that would be nice. 

    It's become a very common mantra that everything you don't like is almost automatically "unconstitutional.  Usually with the speak never having read the constitution or having the faintest idea of what it says.

    1. IDONO profile image78
      IDONOposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      I'd like to add, there are too many micro-analyzing  attorneys and only 1 court of 9 justices that are supposed to comprehend a constitution the size of a library.

  4. profile image0
    Larry Wallposted 6 years ago

    The only issues where the constitutionality would be a consideration would be for amendments to the constitution. However, an amendment, if not worded properly can be found unconstitutional. The Supreme Court is and should always be the final authority for determining the constitutionality of any issue. Just because someone may not like the court that is seated at any given time, is no reason to throw out a system that has served the country well, even if anyone, including myself, do not agree with all the decisions.

    1. d.william profile image76
      d.williamposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      U R assuming that the supreme court is always right. they certainly were not in deciding corporations have the same rights as individuals, (except when it comes to paying taxes).

  5. dianetrotter profile image67
    dianetrotterposted 6 years ago

    Yes.  It would save a lot of time and money.  It might also calm political rhetoric and vitriol.

  6. d.william profile image76
    d.williamposted 6 years ago

    One would certainly think that the answer to your question would be yes, if we used logic and sensibility, but those two words do not seem to mean much to Congress.
    North Dakota just voted to make abortions totally illegal in that state, and by finding that life begins at conception, they also are banning contraceptives.
    However, this vote is unconstitutional from the beginning.  Roe vs Wade give the rights to abortion and contraceptive usage on a national scale.  And states can not override the federal government.  Although they are trying like hell to undo everything the federal government has done, one state at a time, knowing that what they are passing is not legal or constitutional.

  7. Ericdierker profile image51
    Ericdierkerposted 6 years ago

    Almost all law making (legislative) authorities have committees that specialize in making the wording of a law constitutional. Twelve justices may not agree so it is not black and white, there is a lot of gray.

    A court can not rule on a hypothetical, the case must be "ripe" which means being somehow supported or enforced.

    Most constitutional decisions are about restricting the governmental action. It is a safeguard against the "majority" for the individual or minority. It is not just some legal technical lawyerly deal. The way it works is serious business and in fact normally works to preserve life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    The problem you speak of comes only from the politicians passing bad law to look good so you vote for them.

    1. IDONO profile image78
      IDONOposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      So, state governments are putting things on ballots, incurring huge expense, dragging out millions of voters, then taking the result and tossing it to Washington to see what happens? Sounds pretty shoddy to me.

    2. Ericdierker profile image51
      Ericdierkerposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      But you see it has to be that way or we lose our separation of powers. Remember it is the people who can amend the constitution. And it is the executive that has to enforce. It is not perfect but there is no better system.

  8. profile image0
    Old Empresarioposted 6 years ago

    That's for the lawyers in Congress to sort out. If an unconstitutional law passes, one can petition the Supreme Court to rule on the law's constitutionality. But, as we have seen in the past, the Supreme Court lacks the ability to enforce its own rulings and its decisions are sometimes ignored by Congress, the president, and the agencies within the executive branch. If someone is convicted due to the passage of an unconstitutional law, their lawyer can appeal the ruling through the federal court system, which can make a final ruling on whether or not the person was fairly convicted according to the Bill of Rights and the implicit powers of the executive in the Constitution. For various reasons, this system has managed to fail and we're sort of drifing right now.

    1. d.william profile image76
      d.williamposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      drifting?or drowning? N.D. just past a blanket law banning all abortions & contraception use. The federal law (roe vs wade) insures the woman a right of choice? states overriding federal laws?

  9. LandmarkWealth profile image75
    LandmarkWealthposted 6 years ago

    In theory it sounds nice.  But the court does not make the law.  It can only interpret and enforce the law.  So since there are sometimes different views on what is or isn't constitutional, it inevitable that legislation will be drafted and passed that will eventually be overturned.  It would help if some of our members of congress actually took the time read the constitution.  Ron Paul once suggested that no bill should ever be brought to the floor for a vote unless the individuals sponsoring the bill could cite specifically where in the constitution they have the authority to enact the legislation to begin with.   Unfortunately, if our congressmen didn't spend all day drafting laws that simply get in our way, then what on heavens name would they do all day ???


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)