Why does the CIA fail so consistently to anticipate "terror"?
How can the most sophisticated, pervasive, technologically advanced, and expensive intelligence organisation the world has ever known fail so consistently to anticipate "terror" operations in the homeland?
There are 6 billion people in this world. How can any organization possibly monitor every single bad person who may or may not do something evil?
Bad people do bad things. They have since the beginning of time, and always will. Nothing will ever stop it. That is life.
I think it's like they say, we have to be right 100% of the time, the terrorists only have to be right once.
We will never know how many attacks the CIA, FBI et. al. have foiled but I will bet it is a number that would scare you.
Always room to make it better though, but I think they do a pretty good job overall.
Partly because it's very difficult. Partly because the CIA has often busy doing things other than gathering intelligence. These days, it spends a lot of time on targeted assasinations via drone aircraft. During the Cold War, it spent a lot of time on attempts at government overthrows.
As a spy service, it has never been particularly good. Forget about missing terrorist attacks. What about the North Korean invasion of South Korea, the storming of the Iranian embassy, the fall of the Soviet Union, or numerous other intelligence mishaps? Much of the CIA's reputation is based more on mystique than on its record.
They can't read people's minds or be everywhere at once. Do we really want the CIA or FBI down our throats everytime we buy fertilizer or some other substance that MAY make a bomb? It is just an overwhelming task and when something like the horrible Boston Bombing happens we seem to feel the need to place blame. The blame rests squarely on the shoulder of the young men who placed the bombs.
I think over all our country (USA) has done a good job of protecting its people. They have foiled quite a few attempts.
There are several reasons. The most fundamental is the nature of security. Imagine you want to keep intruders out of a building: You must protect every door and window. But an intruder only needs to break into one. Attack is always easier than defense. Second, as others mentioned, there are thousands of potential attackers for every CIA agent.
Third, and this is a good thing, the CIA can't operate in US territory. Only the FBI, under much tighter legal restrictions, can. And although they are communicating better than before 9/11, inter-agency communication is always a challenge.
Fourth, you don't know how often the CIA and FBI succeed. It is likely that they have stopped hundreds or thousands of attacks per year. It's not fair to measure only by the ones that get through, and, for security reasons, we can't get all the data.
Lastly, and most importantly, we choose to live in a free country. Tamerlan, the older brother in the Boston Marathom bombings was a suspect, but was still allowed to visit his homeland in Russia and Chechnya. Would you want the government to say, "We think you might be a terrorist, so you can't go home and visit family?" I write more about terrorism as the cost of freedom in my hub: Boston Marathon Bombings: The Cost of Living in a Free Society.
How can you say consistently? Who knows how many terrorist attacks have been thwarted because of their excellent, diligent work.
In the age of information it seems we have it all at our finger tips. In fact, of course, we have a virtually impossible-to-manage overload of information at our finger tips. And, ironically, the application of the old adage, “a little information... read more
by rhamson 8 years ago
The latest investigation into the tactics employed by the CIA in obtaining valuable information is a volatile issue. Is it one we should pursue?
by Deforest 4 years ago
For me, it would entail the coalition of an elite and a government to terrorize a third group, the people. For instance, the collusion of Mandchurian candidates and the CIA to attack totally randomly the Boston Marathon venue or to go on a killing spree in a theater (the last Batman would be a...
by shinujohn2008 9 years ago
India is on the verge of starting a war with Pakistan. The Indian Air forces are now moving towards the borders and waiting to get commands from Officials to attack Pakistan occupied kashmir and smash Terrorist camps. CNN, Times Now and Headlines have reported such moves by Indian Army.
by Reality Bytes 5 years ago
Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:59AM GMTAt least 35 people have been killed and dozens of others wounded in a missile attack by two US assassination drones in southern Somalia, Press TV reports.The casualties come after an unmanned aircraft fired several missiles at al-Shabab training bases located between the...
by Ralph Schwartz 19 months ago
Another Islamic terror attack in Brussels today - isn't it time to close our borders?Donald Trump has taken heat about closing our borders to Muslims however time and time again Muslims are committing large scale terror attacks - it's time to decide if America wants to stop that bloodshed from...
by Lince 16 months ago
Don't you think Pakistan should be called a "terror sponsor of terrorism" by the United States?There are various proofs of Pakistan officials giving aid and also giving shelter to many terrorists.So don't you think it should be called be a terrorist state?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|