What are the ten most dangerous things about pro-life people?

1. 82

   gmwilliamsposted 4 years ago

   What are the ten most dangerous things about pro-life people?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 71

   aguasilverposted 4 years ago

   1. They focus attention on the 40 million babies killed, which may cause some people to see what is really happening.
   2. The hold a moral compass to the abortion industry which causes women to think about whether their convenience really is of more worth than human life.
   3. They bring God into the argument (maybe that should be the worse offence and therefore number one?) which causes some peoples consciousnesses to stir and cause them discomfort.
   4. The oppose the eugenics plan to reduce world population to 500 million worker drones that will allow the elite to live in comfort and without threat from the peasants.
   5. The CARE about human life.
   6. They make people think about just when 'life' starts, this is particularly dangerous to the cause as it's an area that pro choicers then need to backtrack and obscure because obviously life begins when the two cells start multiplying on their own, and the mothers body becomes a host body.
   7. They are bad for business for abortion clinics.
   8. They are gaining support politically to halt the genocide (culling) of mainly black women who abort.
   9. Extremist pro lifers kill abortionists, which discourages others to take up the work.
   10. The save human lives and encourage fertility, marriage and responsibility, all things that stand in opposition to pro choice propaganda.

   replyreport
   1. 82

      gmwilliamsposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Sure, force a woman to endure an unwanted pregnancy and to have a child she DIDNT' want in the first place. Boy, you are HUMANE!

      replyreport
   2. 71

      aguasilverposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      If she did not want it in the first place, there were viable solutions, ranging from birth control to abstinence..... once a life is conceived, there is another entity involved, and the decision becomes shall I kill that life, or let it live.

      replyreport
   3. 82

      Aime Fposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Birth control is unfortunately not a 100% guarantee. I know a handful of women myself who conceived while using some method of BC.
      
      So should everyone just not have sex until they want children?

      replyreport
   4. 83

      grand old ladyposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Birth control is okay but not abortion. If you become pregnant but didn't plan it, sometimes accidents are good things. Babies are gifts. You never have 100 percent control over anything. Abortion is not the answer.

      replyreport
   5. 82

      Aime Fposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Oh! Okay then. Just tell a woman who is being forced to have a baby she took precautions to avoid that it's a gift. That will make it so much easier to parent a child.

      replyreport
   6. 71

      aguasilverposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Aime F, it seems that you cannot understand that children are not a convenience to be discarded when no longer desired because it would affect our life, and believe that therefore we can kill them for our personal selfishness.
      
      That's a real shame.

      replyreport
   7. 82

      Aime Fposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I'm not talking about someone who decided to have a baby and then killed it when it kept them up at night. I'm talking about aborting a fetus when BC fails. If you can't understand the difference then THAT is a shame.

      replyreport
   8. 71

      aguasilverposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I can understand the difference you see, but not see the difference.
      Once life has been formed, once two cells can multiply, without God's or mans intervention, a child will be produced. That's life, so to stop that life, is killing, that's a fact.

      replyreport
   9. 51

      ChristinSposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I hope that no one here who is so against killing of anything ever swats at bugs, eats meat of any kind, etc.  A few cells is not a life or a baby. Early abortions are not "killing" a "baby". It's not infanticide its simply stopping a pregnancy.

      replyreport
   10. 82

       gmwilliamsposted 4 years agoin reply to this

       ChristinS, well said and totally occur.

       replyreport
   11. 71

       aguasilverposted 4 years agoin reply to this

       Personally I am only against killing babies and human beings, God gave us dominion over the other worlds (dominion = responsibility) to maintain them, and most animals for food. Living cells that will produce humans are indeed human life. Your choice

       replyreport
3. 51

   ChristinSposted 4 years ago

   The same people who are "pro life" are 9 times out of 10 the same people who are against any form of support for said child once it is born.  pro life then you're on your own kid - sorry.
   
   The people who are pro-"life" are often usually pro death penalty and pro war - explain to me how one killing is justified? You are either pro "life" all the way around or you are a hypocrite.
   
   The risks of abuse and neglect for an unwanted child are far greater. 
   
   Pro-lifers tend to see the world in black and white and only through their own lens.  They don't consider that abortions are often extremely difficult and gut wrenching choices - like in the instances where the fetus is not wholly viable and is suffering.  We put animals down that are suffering no one bats an eyelash.  Ending the suffering of a fetus that will not live anyway and is in great pain is seen as murder.
   
   We hear all about the fetus, but what about the welfare of the mother? If her health is at risk or life is in jeopardy and she may have other children to consider?
   
   Sexual assaults do happen - they are a small percent, but it is grossly inhumane to expect a woman to bear a rapists child.
   
   Most pro-life people and many pro-choice are so "all or nothing" that compromises can't be reached. - this is dangerous in any situation.
   
   Sometimes birth control fails - and the woman or couple is not in the position to provide for another child. Expecting people to just be celibate when sex is a natural human urge is ridiculous, especially with married couples using birth control.
   
   The same people who are pro-life also push for abstinence only sex education - a grossly naive form of "education" that does not work. "red" states with these programs have HIGHER levels of teen pregnancy.  Why not be honest about sex and provide real, well-rounded education and resources to prevent pregnancy? Many abortions would be prevented, but many of these people want to push their morality onto others at all costs. It's about power over others, keeping women in their place,  and self-righteousness usually more than about saving lives with many of these people. 
   
   Most of us are reasonable and fall in the middle. We dont' want abortion abused, but we understand it is a choice for a woman and her healthcare provider to make.

   replyreport
4. 82

   Aime Fposted 4 years ago

   I think a previous poster did a good job of displaying what's potentially dangerous about anyone with extreme views, but probably not in the way they intended...
   
   -The only thing that makes me uncomfortable about bringing God into a conversation about abortion is the fact that you're projecting your beliefs on everyone else.
   
   -The comment about eugenics and worker drones... Really good point, lots of facts to back that one up, I'm sure.
   
   -The assumption that someone with a different perspective on this particular issue surely cannot care about human life. Or marriage, fertility and responsibility... apparently.
   
   I don't think it's an issue with 'pro-lifers', necessarily, but people in general who are incapable of holding strong views while being able to respect those who don't see things exactly the way that they do.

   replyreport
   1. 71

      aguasilverposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      "So should everyone just not have sex until they want children?"
      No, but everyone should consider that sex is designed to produce children, and once conception has taken place, the life conceived has rights and the 'parents' should consider them.

      replyreport