Why the airstrikes on Iraq?
The fact that Obama did call the airstrikes to give food and water is good but the way he handled it was truly not responsible choosing to broadcast that he will be giving essentials to the people that are trapped on that mountain side is a opportunity for the attackers to just go back up the mountain and take all supplies we gave them seemingly that we had never helped them at all just put them in a harder situation.
Airstrikes don't deliver food and water. An airstrike is an attack on enemy assets (troops, equipment, infrastructure, etc.) Delivering food and water would be an airdrop. Obama has done both (as have other countries). They have airdropped supplies to the trapped people and have attacked enemy assets to try and prevent them from being able to attack the people. So far it seems to have had minor effectiveness. Some of the Yazidis were able to escape, and some enemy assets were destroyed, such as an artillery piece which had been bombarding the mountain, but overall it has been too little too late.
Those who escaped report severe shortages of food and water, so it is likely that whatever was dropped was consumed pretty quickly, and therefore probably wouldn't be sitting around for ISIS to go get.
Additionally, the planes dropping supplies are large, with jet escorts. And while I don't know if the supplies dropped had parachutes or the altitude they were at, regardless, it isn't much of a stealth operation, and I suspect would most likely be noticed regardless of Obama broadcasting it or not.
I understand what you mean and I wondered the same thing. It seems not only that but other things the ISIS are getting warnings; because you know they are paying attention.
by lady_love158 7 years ago
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/0 … ep-the-oilI've said the same thing as Trump way before he went on Oreilly. I'm opposed to war unless it's in self defense and in that case to the victor go the spoils! If we're forced into war we should be compensated for it. So yes take Iraq make it...
by My Esoteric 4 years ago
One of President Bush's arguments for invading Iraq was the strong Hussain-al Qaeda connection. The anti-Iraq invasion group said there was only very skimpy evidence of that and much stronger evidence that such an arrangement couldn't exist;. After several extensive post-war...
by Evan G Rogers 6 years ago
I'm sorry, but I have yet to find any evidence that Iran is building a nuke. Yet, the EU just condemned starvation and austerity to the people of Iran because it MIGHT be building a nuke.http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/mid … story.htmlBest quote of the article? "increase sanctions...
by mortimerjackson 6 years ago
Despite what Obama's press secretary might tell you, the only reason that America is leaving Iraq is because of a declaration signed by George Bush saying that America will leave by 2011. Obama insisted upon staying in Iraq, but the Iraqi government has refused to grant US troops immunity for their...
by Kathleen Cochran 4 years ago
The Iraq we know is not the Iraq the factions have ever recognized. If the Middle East consumes itself for the coming years with fighting each other over creating new states along sectarian lines, how is that a bad thing for the US?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 23 months ago
WHAT do you think of Donald Trump's statement that Obama founded ISIS?
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|