How much should the tax payer be force to spend to reduce poverty?
As a nation America currently has a debt of $18 trillion and unfunded liabilities of $127 trillion. In 1964 President Johnson declared a War on Poverty. At that time the poverty level was about 14 %. The US Census Bureau, this week will release poverty figures of 14%. From 1964 to present the tax payer was forced to pay $22 trillion to achieve what? 109 million Americans are on welfare, 92 million are not in the workforce and the median income has decreased by $4,000 per year. What does the future hold?
Simple mechanics. War on Anything and you increase that "thing."
America has had so many "wars" on things and all of them have failed. I wonder if this is by design. Certainly, the bureaucrats have more power to funnel and channel funds away from the people who worked for those funds. Such wars have so poor a track record, they need to be repealed.
But there's more going on here than meets the eye. That should be obvious to anyone who has studied history, current events and news media across multiple sources (not just the Mainstream Media sources).
Simple critical thinking applied to the language of the media shows that we are being manipulated in an Orwellian manner. Take war as a "peacekeeping action," for instance. Since when has war ever been peace anything? War is never peace, except in George Orwell's _1984_ and the American media.
War on Drugs? Big Wall Street banks were caught laundering money for drug cartels -- fined hundreds of millions of dollars, but no bankers went to jail for such criminal activity. Ouch!
Empirical evidence shows this War on Poverty doesn't work. But it also reveals the possibility that other forces may be at work -- corruption taking advantage of the knee-jerk reaction of public and legislators to media stimuli. "OMG! Poverty is ruining America. We have to do something about it." "OMG! The Housing Bubble burst in 2008. If we don't prop up the corrupt bankers and keep them out of jail, the whole world will go down the toilet."
It all keeps getting more and more insane.
Now, the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave is actually Land of the Slave (legislated tyranny starting with the unPatriot Act) and Home of the Coward (oh, please protect me from the boogie man).
As Franklin said, those who give up a little liberty for security deserve neither. And that's exactly what America has done.
Perhaps a bigger reason for doing away with this legislated "compassion," is that compassion should be individual responsibility, not offloaded to the Nanny Tyranny. Personal responsibility has been eroded on multiple fronts for more than a century, especially in America.
Zero, I agree wholeheartedly. It is amazing how fast self-responsibility would increase if people were allowed to hit real bottoms; unlike now when so called poverty households include cable TV, multiple vehicles, cell phones, etc.
lone77--"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." B. Franklin credited. No war on poverty we would be $3 trillion in the black.
by Reality Bytes 7 years ago
This question was asked during the last debate. No one answered it.What percentage of a workers income should the worker be allowed to keep? What is a fair share?50%, 60% what do you think?The question was asked in dollars, I have rephrased it because I am interested in those...
by janesix 3 years ago
I think it is due to the erosion of families. Mothers no longer stay home with their young children, and fathers are no where to be seen in a large percentage of families. The kids don't have a father figure, and I think this leads to joining gangs, dropping out of school, and criminal behavior. Am...
by cascoly 7 years ago
just how are the republicans proposing to reduce the deficit of a trillion dollars when cutting...ALL discretionary spending would still leaverhundreds of billons in debt? what part of defense, social esecurity, etc are they going to cut?
by awesome77 3 weeks ago
Coming from a very poor background, I have come to realize that most rich people do not give a rats ass about the poor! If in doubt, show me a rich person and you will see someone that has gone to great lengths to isolate themselves from the poor!Most rich people like to live in non accessible...
by Mahaveer Sanglikar 21 months ago
Why there is poverty in specific people while others are well to do people? Who are responsible for poverty - the poor people themselves, Government policies or the system?
by arizonataylor 6 years ago
What is the best way to reduce health costs in America?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|