|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Should POW camps be set up to deal with "potential" terrorists?
There are often long lists of "potential" threats listed by security agencies in various countries. Every government says they are impossible to police but POW camps would solve the problem. It may be that governments simply find it "cheaper" to keep such people in the community even though it poses a huge risk to "us" the general public. The numbers of such people only number in the hundreds in each Western country so POW camps could solve the immediate threats.
There could possibly be some intermediate alternatives first, such as: probation contacts, ankle monitors, deportation.
One of the great thing about America is that the punishment comes only after the crime. You're innocent until you are proven guilty. Anything you suggest, first imagine what you'd think of it if you were someday wrongly accused of being a terrorist threat. Maybe something you wrote could be misconstrued as terrorist propaganda, just for speaking your mind? If accused, wrongly, of being a terrorist, would you be okay being held in a POW camp, or kept on probation, or made to wear an ankle monitor? Or is freedom worth everyone being free, even if that means the potential for harm? As soon as we start taking that freedom from people, we don't deserve it either.
Its unpalatable but usual practice during war times to have camps. Not for ever muslim just those deemed at risk
It's that "deemed a risk" part that's the problem. People determined who's a risk, and people make mistakes. You or I could just as easily be "deemed a risk" after letting off some steam after getting a ticket or something.
My other concern is that right wing governments may be using a handful of "risks" to make draconian security laws instead of simply putting them in POW camps to easily remove the potential threat..
That's the problem. Fear of such things are what cause us to take freedom away from others. Because it's easier to keep track of them if they're locked up, or something similar. It's a slippery slope. Freedom means there will be danger and risk.
I realise the dangers but this is definitely a War. Not since the Nazis have we seen such a thirst for total genocide
But if we take such precautions then the terrorists have succeeded. We give them power by responding in this kind of way. The best we can do is live on and show we're not intimidated and can't be made to do what they want.
Laws will change during war time. It is inevitable. Its not intimidation just temporary war time precaution.
It's fear, pure and simple. Fear of the 'what if's'. We can't let fear cause us to take people's freedoms away. We're only then creating more animosity that only makes it easier for terrorists to recruit and perpetuate the cycle.
Those few hundred people have serious potential to harm others. Its just unfortunate that camps are a fact of war. Its just volleyball and farm work.
by dadibobs6 years ago
If your country was invaded, would fighting to free your people from occupation make you a terrorist?, therefore being feared, hated and eventually punished, or would you become a public hero, reaping the benefits along...
by manlypoetryman8 years ago
I don't get...the P.C. Climate that is so afraid to call an "Ace"; an "Ace" or a "Spade"; a "Spade".Austin kamikaze pilot (yesterday) = TerroristChristmas underwear bomber =...
by ptosis22 months ago
Are you a “potential terrorist”?Conservative, libertarian, Christian or gun owner? Opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations? Believe in conspiracy theories or...
by Lela3 years ago
As an online journalistic, free speech, and opinion piece media outlet, is HubPages in any kind of danger? Are individual hubbers at risk for posting certain opinion and religious pieces? What is HP doing to protect its...
by Paula2 years ago
Within days of the attacks on Paris, the news is saying France is being merciless in their bombing of certain sites n Syria. The United States intelligence shared with them, so they knew where to potentially...
by onlinearticlespk6 years ago
Taliban in Afghanistan are fighting for their homeland. is it justified to call them a terrorist when there is no proof of their involvement of 9/11 which is used as a base against them? cabn any country declare...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.