this just came in my email today...check it out...what do you think?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … s_ss=email
Definitely interesting, and potentially promising for a solution. If we keep planting new trees and restoring native grasslands, we may be able to keep the terrestrial ecosystem's ability to absorb carbon dioxide steady.
In case you weren't aware of it, though, expecting the oceans to continue absorbing our excess carbon dioxide is far more dangerous.
I would love to be able to understand specifically what all that information means ...but the last paragraph seemed to sum it up...no one is absolutely positive what is happening and what may happen in the future.
But I read nothing about algae and other green plants of the ocean...(that i know of, at least I didn't read the word algae anywhere (did I?). so what about it? doesn't algae have a lot to do with the condition of the oceans? photosynthesis and all that? doesn't that help?
and what about the other pollutants that are dumped in the ocean from cities and businesses and ships and such...how big of a factor are those forms of pollutants?
We are carbon based life forms. The Human body is 18% Carbon.
If you tell a guy on the Street "Carbon Dioxide" is bad they will buy into it. People have such a limited understanding of anything scientific.
What is Carbon Dioxide?
Carbon Dioxide is the gas we exhale at the end of each breath.
Carbon Dioxide is the gas that plants use in a process explained in most Grade Schools called "Photosynthesis".
Plants use sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to grow.
Carbon Dioxide is absorbed by plants... so maybe the solution is to stop letting Oil Companies destroy South American rain forests. Or maybe we should plant more plants? The ocean is full of microscopic plant life. Maybe it's time to stop polluting the Ocean?
The number 1 consumer of fossil fuels is the United States Military Industrial Complex. Any plans to cut back there? Did you know before a jet can land on an aircraft carrier they jettison whatever fuel is on board directly into the ocean. Yep, they just dump it straight into the Ocean to reduce the risk of explosion should the aircraft crash.
Or maybe, just maybe we should stop listening to Fear Mongerers and follow the money to see the real agenda behind the Global Warming Fraud.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Global-Warming- … lete-Fraud
What is very clear about "Global Warming" is the people behind the movement are in it for the money.
If this were about saving the planet, we would be addressing Pollution. And Co2 is not pollution. We would be working to stop the exploitation of natural resources on behalf of Corporate Profits. The leaders of the movement would not be setting up back end companies for their own self profit.
Exxon paid NO Punitive Damages for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Texaco destroyed the Ecuadorian Rain Forest, then just left.
C02 is the easiest gas to demonize because it is so prevalent.
Thank You for posting this article.
by ngureco 9 years ago
China is now emitting more carbon dioxide than US. How is Obama going to counter this?
by Ralph Schwartz 19 months ago
Do you consider CO2 as an air pollutant?According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. is among the cleanest nations on the planet, with the cleanest air in the world, significantly cleaner in fact than the air in Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the UK, Japan, Austria and...
by H P Roychoudhury 7 years ago
Why is only Carbon dioxide considered for climate change and not any other gases?
by Tcad1191 7 years ago
Why or why notP.S. you would be surprised to find out how many people don't believe in global warming.
by SparklingJewel 8 years ago
The Cap and Tax Energy Tax is set to be unveiled on Monday.It's the start of the full-court press to expand governmentcontrol over the energy and manufacturing sectors of theeconomy -- and impose a huge "global warming" tax onevery American consumer.Details are starting to leak out....
by Kevin Peter 5 years ago
If your answer is “Yes” then, why aren’t the birds that nest on trees not affected by the carbon dioxide produced by the tree at night?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|