|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Why are my most recent two Hubs not been considered worthy of publication?
My two Hubs: Ship versus Plane Travel, and UFO's - Fact or Fiction, bear the 'empty circle' icon showing they're not of good enough quality. However, I'm unable to understand why. Each has plenty of good content. Also, each has several good pictures of reasonable pixel density.
As I've published hundreds of Hubs over the past six years, I'm at a loss to know who to bring them up to the mysterious standard Hubpages requires. Any clues, please?
The only clues I can offer is the process. That is a topic now and then at the forums while more often is receiving a lack of traffic symbol. I guess I would first have to ask the surrounding circumstances to fathom a guess. I presume you are talking about a 'New Hub'? and it was also not featured?
Who to bring it up to is an email to HP. They will want you to be as complete as possible with the description of the problem. Theother is to post at the Forums in the 'Improving Your Hub' section for others to review it. There are some astute reviewers with experience that share openly. Some not so much. One should expect criticism. However, an edit will send it through the eval process again. That is next . . .
A new Hub
With a new Hub it is read by readers at a service called MTurk owned/operated by Amazon. And, it is checked by bots with algorithms. A reader for MTurk is tested by HP somehow and evaluated again periodically for proficiency. They have guidelines to follow. Those can be found for both informational and creative articles at this link . . .
That also leads me to believe those two checks - bot & MTurk, determine the original score.
When a new Hub is published to see how many times it was read by MTurk you can see that at the My Account Page → Traffic Sources link above the listed Hubs. Once there look at the 'Domain'. Below are the domain sources.
It may be best to sort at domain since it is alpha. Look for 'mturk' and then glance at the 24hr, 7-days, and etc. If they have read anything recently you will see that indicated. With a new Hub you will see activity in the 24hr and 7-days.
The edited Hub I 'think' goes through that process again. Speculation is if a major edit or not. Perhaps with an edit checking the Traffic Source may offer a clue. I have not tried that myself.
Other cases for receiving a low quality symbol could be:
Unpublished and revitalized thus possibly MTurk
A Hub Reported by a reader as Low Quality and reviewed - MTurk? (See red report link at top right of Hub for possible reporting reasons)
Triggered by a bot review with an algorithm and sent to MTurk?
Other than that I am guessing as well as speculating . . .
Thanks, Tim, for your very detailed reply. Appreciate it.
Your Welcome. A common reason is 'spammy elements'. Those are checked by bots & MTurk. Once is incorrect or overuse of Amazon / ebay capsules. The other incorrect out going link usage. Help is in the Learning center or asking her or forums.
Hello Tom, It seems there is no rhyme or reason for some of the hubs we as authors write to be unpublished, and I think it depends on the moderator. One may not like your grammar, then another may think it is okay.
I find that reading my hubs out loud helps me to see what the moderators see and that helps me when mine become unpublished.
Good luck to you Tom.
by Sheila Craan16 months ago
Lately, I have had 11 hubs unfeatured due to Quality Issues. I have assured my hubs do not contain grammatical or spelling errors. I have included relevant video and changed the titles and added new supporting texts and...
by RanaKm3 years ago
So, I've had a hub unpublished due to HP claiming that it's overly promotional.The hub only has 2 outbound links ( which is the number of links we're allowed to put for the other external sites ) this is the only thing...
by Carolee Samuda4 years ago
If you have an unfeatured hub and you know not why, place the link here and we will try to help you.Calling in the troupes to help hubbers who need help getting their hubs featured.
by dablufox7 years ago
I would like to know why, after I have wasted my time writing a number email to hubpages arguing that a few of my hubs have been pulled and put into no man's land, one of my hubs they have allowed yet two other have...
by Shannon Anders5 years ago
How are hubs scored before they're published?
by Kristin Kaldahl4 years ago
I have a quick question. If I unpublish a hub, does Google "see" that it's still sitting in my account and thus punish me for it, or should I be totally deleting hubs that I decide are not garnering...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.