|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
If anyone at all "won" the Republican debate on 2/13/2016 (or not) name the top three in order.
My own impression: Trump came across as having learned nothing, or even as not wanting to win the Republican nomination. Kasich came across as the winner, followed in a Rubio and Carson tie for third. Cruz struck me as too much of a politician class "smoothie", Bush as still too weak for the office, and the squabbling left me wishing some of them could still challenge each other to a duel!
Kasich, Kasich, and Kasich - he was the only one with a decent humanitarian composure. The rest of them are just back biting, hateful, sore loser, obstructionists.
Meanwhile, I will be voting for Bernie Sanders - who really cares about our country and its citizens.
Kasich played the role of 'neutral observer' sure he remained calm, stayed 'above the fray' but we are looking for a President that will be able to take a hit and use his wit to respond... Hillary will be ruthless, Hillary will lie, Hillary will pound away at any weakness not shored up... Kasich has yet to show anything to me other than he is a nice guy with sound thinking.
Trump came across like a toad, it was a damaging night for him, he didn't have to go on the attack against Bush, and his brother, especially for 9/11. He weakened his position in that debate.
Rubio was the winner, where Bush's responses to Trump's rants were rather weak, Rubio's counters were well articulated and concise, he had the best comments of the night, and reversed much of the damage he had done to himself in NH... if he could come across a bit stronger and more confident it could go a long way to making him seem like the only logical chance the Reps have.
Cruz cruised along in neutral, neither gaining or losing ground in that debate.
The format of the debates is ridiculous as it leads to personal attacks. And this should be like the TV show Jeopardy. The time limits are too short, and the questions don't bring out the issues.
A better format would, especially where there are six or more candidates, would be to deal with one issue. That would require a weekly debate to go through the important issues.
Let the candidates get time to propose their solutions to the issue, so the issue should be an important one.
This would give the voters a chance to understand the position of each candidate on that single issue. The rest of the candidates can then try to discredit the worth of each of the candidates position.
Right now the debates are no more than sound bytes, as opposed to real discussions on the issues.
The media should follow that debates with a truth or consequence based on the information brought forward by the candidates. Fact verification of all the points that were brought up in the debate, and let the damage fall where it may.
Unfortunately this can't happen because the media appears to be biased, while the voters still need veracity from the debates.
by My Esoteric19 months ago
There were two distinct debating styles on display last night on Sept 26, 2016.How do you describe what in on?
by Yves20 months ago
And The Winner Is? Who do you think wil become the next President of the United States of America?Trump's un-favorability rating is at 65%, while Hillary's is at 55%, but she also has a possible indictment hanging over...
by Susie Lehto18 months ago
The New York Times is one of the mainstream news outlets that has gone further left-wing than the others with out-right lies, so I am wondering how they will cover this story. They cannot keep covering up for the...
by Faith Reaper19 months ago
If you watched the first debate between Hillary and Trump, who do you think came out ahead and why?I'm just curious, if you watched the debate, who do you think came out ahead after the first debate between Hillary or...
by Jack Lee2 years ago
Why are Clinton and Trump the front runners this election year?I'm baffled. According to polls, 70% of Americans say we are headed in the wrong direction. Yet, we have Clinton ahead in the Democratic primary. More over,...
by Mike Russo22 months ago
The current debate format is a farce and is nothing more than a slug fest that we watch. The moderators have little to no control over the debaters. John Donvan has a petition that proposes change the...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.