jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (5 posts)

What is YOUR ASSESSMENT of Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate & ....as

  1. gmwilliams profile image86
    gmwilliamsposted 20 months ago

    What is YOUR ASSESSMENT of Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate & ....as a....PERSON?


  2. bradmasterOCcal profile image29
    bradmasterOCcalposted 20 months ago

    While the bar has been set low for the presidential candidates over the years, Hillary has brought it to its lowest in the last several decades.
    This brought the low down from Jimmy Carter, and Barack Obama.
    Neither of these three were really qualified to be president. President Bill Clinton was above the level of these three only because of his ability to spread the aura of being qualified.

    Not to say that GW Bush was much better qualified, but maybe just a better person. Although, Jimmy Carter beat him out in that regard.

    GH Bush had potential, as a candidate but he didn't do well as president.
    Unfortunately, the democrats did worse than the republicans in candidates for the presidency, but that was probably based on the difference of the presidential aspirations and agendas.

    Hillary Clinton as a person is even a more lower position than assessing her as a presidential candidate. She is a passive aggressive depending on the position that she holds, but her character is still the same. She is in life for herself, and she changes her color and shape as needed to accomplish her goals.

    It didn't work in 2008, but now on the back of a black president, the waves of estrogen are sweeping the politics. She is capturing the Abortion, the lgbt, and the women's rights to champion.

    This is the election for the woman president, not the best president just that it is time for the woman. She can't do much for making woman equal on the job, but as a symbol for woman if she becomes president.

    For over 40 years Hillary has had a trail of carnage and destruction of people that have come too close to opening the veil of the true Hillary.

    Unqualified presidential candidate
    Human predator as a person.

    1. R. Martin Basso profile image79
      R. Martin Bassoposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      I was always taught that if I can't say something nice about someone, not today anything at all. Not much for me to work with here on the topic of Hillary Clinton, but ok, here it goes: Hillary is a beast.
      That's about as nice as I can muster.

  3. Dont Taze Me Bro profile image60
    Dont Taze Me Broposted 20 months ago


    Well, well, well. As a presidential candidate I think her candidacy tells the whole story of just how low the Democrat party will go in it's quest for power. If this is the best the Democrat Party has to offer (and Trump the best the Republicans have to offer) then this two party system is nothing but a ruse to keep the elite in power, screw "we the people".

    This is a woman who, if she  never married Bill Clinton, you and I wouldn't even know her name. Their facade of a marriage is so important to her political legitimacy without it she could claim nothing. Everything she's done is predicated on this marriage. She was hired at the Rose law firm when he became attorney general in Arkansas, she was made partner when he became governor, when he became President it opened the door for her to run for President.

    As a person? Really, you want to know what people think of her as a person?

    Everybody knows what kind of person SHE IS (whether they want to admit it or not) and to answer that question won't tell you anything new about the person she is but can only tell you a lot about the person giving his/her opinion.

    Just ask yourself, knowing all that is in the public domain about Hillary, her lies, her scandals, her phony accomplishments, the fact that she is under investigation revealing new lies almost daily, is this a woman you would trust with your child's welfare? (lying on 4 separate occasions about she AND HER DAUGHTER landing under sniper fire comes to mind, I suppose Chelsea was supposed to lie for her?, or her being in charge of squelching her husband's bimbo eruptions, or telling you your son died because of a video).

    Do you really think anyone is paying millions of dollars to hear her or her husband speak for 30 minutes or so? She is selling influence. What on earth could you imagine they are saying that could be worth $200,000 or more for a half hour or so?

    This woman is a conniving, narcissistic liar with no sense of morality, an elitist if there ever was one who believes she and her husband are above the law which is meant for peons like you and me to be kept in our place. The closest she can come to any morality is to give it lip service if she thinks it will gain her some sort of approval from whomever. This is not what I think of her as a person, this what Hillary the person is. Anyone who thinks differently about her as a person, well like I said, that tells you more about them than about Hillary.

  4. profile image57
    frumpletonposted 18 months ago

    I think things will go on more or less like in the present, but at least, even with the email accusations, she hasn't invited Russia to hack into the USA's computers like Trump did.  Our country will remain safer with Hillary.  If Trump wins, heaven help us.  I don't know of any hard working person who ever made as much as Trump has.  That's because crooks make buddies with bad people and profit from it.  Trump likes Putin.  So, I guess Trump is a communist.  Hillary withstood public humiliation when her husband was discovered to have cheated on her with Monica.  It takes a lot of strength, I think to do that, instead of hiding at home.