jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (4 posts)

State curtailed its review of Clinton's emails while the FBI investigated. It's

  1. Perspycacious profile image81
    Perspycaciousposted 21 months ago

    State curtailed its review of Clinton's emails while the FBI investigated. It's on, Will it matter?

    Reportedly the State Department's resumed review of the handling of Mrs. Clinton's emails could mean the loss of security clearances for former State Department staff who handled Mrs. Clinton's emails, even such a loss for Mrs. Clinton herself.  Some of her staff seemed headed for important White House positions which require such clearances.  If they lose their clearances for Top Secret materials, should she lose hers?  If she does, how could she function as President of the United States of America?


  2. tamarawilhite profile image90
    tamarawilhiteposted 21 months ago

    One department halted its investigation to let the other do its investigation. Now they can resume it, though when the FBI director says yes she was grossly negligent, yes other people have gone to jail for this, but we won't indict HER - I don't have faith any other federal department under Obama will do differently.

  3. Paul Kuehn profile image93
    Paul Kuehnposted 21 months ago

    Any other lower ranking government official would lose their security clearance if they did what Clinton did.  RHIP and this is a classic example of how Hillary can get away with what she did.

  4. Ericdierker profile image54
    Ericdierkerposted 21 months ago

    Did you know that if a soldier is tasked with handling secret information and therefor has a security clearance they will lose it if convicted of any sort of drunk driving? I find it just amazing the Clinton has not lost her national security clearance. If the State Department does not yank it, it will be an injustice of a magnitude that is just incomprehensible.