|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisements has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
How do you feel about a judge forcing a criminal to engage in religious activities?
If a judge forces a convicted individual to interact in the religion of the judge's preference, do you think it violates the convicted person's rights? What about forcing sex offenders or murderers to attend church or therapy or treatment offered by a religious organization? What if it is not your religion?
Yes, it violates the convicted person's right & furthermore, it is against the Constitution which advocates freedom of religion. The judge is an authoritarian *&^% dictator. No one has the right to force people to have a religion or to undergo religious activities. Religion is a relic from the past Such a judge would be classified as an unthinking, instinctive retrogressive. Religion isn't the panacea for criminal activities.
Let the convicted individual serve time or indulge in community service activities. Let's also put psychological &/or psychiatric therapy(without the medication) in the mix. Such things would benefit the individual far more than nonsensical & moronic religious activities.
I think if it is presented as an alternative to a prison sentence, then it should be a choice made by the criminal. In the past, the Supreme Court has not decided in favor of the judges. Neutering sex offenders because they have a high rate of recidivism.
This one might even be deemed a violation of the 1st amendment. Construing the judge as a part of the state forming a religion. I am sure the ACLU will be on it.
by TMApsey6 years ago
Do you think it's wrong to force your beliefs on your children?
by sriramapriya4 years ago
Why most of the Christians forcing people to convert in christianity?
by lang587 years ago
My question is: How far will some criminals go to hide their "true nature"? I welcome any answers to this very important question.Someone answer this question please.
by Elizabeth4 years ago
How exactly are Christians claiming persecution by the repeal of DOMA?I hear all the time that the homosexuals are "forcing their agenda" on others, and that Christians are being forced too accept them, and I...
by PrettyPanther4 weeks ago
"President Donald Trump said Saturday that he doesn’t expect Michael Cohen, his longtime personal lawyer and fixer, to “flip” as the government investigates Cohen’s business dealings.Trump, in a series of...
by Fairbear8 years ago
I'll pick up on this thread where I left off in the last, but on a new topic. The last one was about a flaw in Christian theology, namely, the impossible definition of God. This one is about protective coloring in the...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.