When you hear news - do you research or fact check it before forwarding?

Jump to Last Post 1-5 of 5 discussions (11 posts)
  1. ptosis profile image66
    ptosisposted 2 years ago

    When you hear news - do you research or fact check it before forwarding?

    So get info such as 9th circuit court has 80% cases overturned - the highest in the system - would you fact check that on snopes or the American Bar association first?     " .. more than 99 percent of that circuit’s decisions stood and the Supreme Court reviewed a scant 0.106 percent of circuit court cases each year."
    The answer is yes … and really no. Confused? Many are, because we all suck at math.


  2. Ken Burgess profile image90
    Ken Burgessposted 2 years ago

    I would never use 'fact check' or some other source that checks the facts... because they themselves often have a 'bias' in how they report the facts, and/or what facts they choose to find.

    But I almost always do a Search... you can type in:
    "9th circuit court has 80% cases overturned"

    and then I select what looks like interesting results:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-mem … athan-keim

    http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/arti … sed_appeal

    Wala... doing my own research and not relying on Snopes to give the answer to me.

    1. bradmasterOCcal profile image35
      bradmasterOCcalposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Ken, great comment.

    2. Ericdierker profile image50
      Ericdierkerposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks Ken, I have been meaning to look that up.

    3. ptosis profile image66
      ptosisposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Great answer: For the 9th, used not only snopes but also the ABA

  3. lisavollrath profile image94
    lisavollrathposted 2 years ago

    I am that annoying friend who fact checks all the crazy stuff people post, and leaves a link of the source showing it's bogus in the comments.

    So, yes. I'm a fact checker.

    I like PolitiFact, but I also like to Google the pertinent details, and see what the first five or six sites are that support the statement. If they're an assortment of well-known organizations, I feel good about it. If they're the usual list of extreme right-wing or left-wing blogs, not so much.

    1. Ken Burgess profile image90
      Ken Burgessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      As I noted in my answer:  http://www.npr.org/2012/01/10/144974110 … under-fire
      The only way to really find unbiased answers is to do your own research from scratch, otherwise you swallowing whatever bias or BS they are feeding u

    2. lisavollrath profile image94
      lisavollrathposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      What I've learned from HP: no matter which sites you use to verify facts, somebody is going to tell you they're biased. I could say I was standing there, watching an event happen, and someone would still yell bias.

    3. Ken Burgess profile image90
      Ken Burgessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Indeed... I guess the point I would like to make, is that the 'fact check' sites aren't 100% reliable, and have a tendency to be not quite so factual in their fact checking.

  4. dashingscorpio profile image86
    dashingscorpioposted 2 years ago

    I don't forward news stories unless they're unique or funny.
    My guess is most people who do forward news stories are not investing their time trying to "fact check" or compile other sources. News stories are biased right down to the photos used.
    Most people forward news stories that (they agree with) to people they believe will appreciate them or in some instances it's an attempt to win an argument they've been having with someone.

  5. Ericdierker profile image50
    Ericdierkerposted 2 years ago

    This question is interesting to have on a writer's site. I would not trust fact check business as far as I can throw them. I think a side trip to Wicki to get some buzz words, Chase down what buzz words were used in the news, Look for non-paid PDF references. Kind of check to see what Gov entity regulates a field and see what they got.
    But forwarding for me is sending it to a confidant to get their view, not to show them that something is true.
    What I see as the biggest mistake that researchers make is considering conclusions as facts. You just cannot be that lazy and be credible. You simply do not read the headline and the last line. You have to go through and put facts down, and then separate them with pros and cons and further separate them by fake type hyperbole like flaming adjectives or adverbs.
    If it was a "bright sunny day" does that mean the witness was blinded by bright or that he had on sunglasses that partially obstructed color vision?
    I used to right mostly legal stuff. You have to cite every single source used to come up with your argument.
    Now I write a whole lot about the Bible. But you would have to know your bible to know that because I do not due that "this verse says this so that means it makes sense here" kind of bolstering. Either it makes sense to you are it doesn't. In the philosophy and spirituality field you do not state as a fact, that is for the reader to determine.

    Great question and it made me kind of review and structure my process. I think I do some of this without even a conscious intention.
    Politics are cool because in the end the only fact that matters is the fact of if someone bought the bullshit.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)