Should an independent committee investigate Russia's interference and Trump Col

1. 60

   DICESIposted 8 years ago

   Should an independent committee  investigate Russia's interference and Trump Collusion, not Congress
   
   After Nunes compromised the Russia investigation by informing Trump of information pertinent to the investigation against Trump, can we really trust that there will be an independent investigation?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 86

   lovemychrisposted 8 years ago

   no, hes got to go. not only was he on trump's transition team, he was trying to dissuade people of trump/russia ties. he also has all his money tied up in a winery that relies on a russian distribution company...owned by a friend of putin. this is too messy and not at all objective.
   this has become a partisan issue: patriotism taking a back seat.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      DICESIposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I agree. Nunes must go, but should we have an independent commission now that the investigation is compromised.

      replyreport
   2. 86

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      oh yes, without a doubt. remember whitewater? ken starr. id say this is 500 times more important. potentially an act of war.

      replyreport
3. 60

   DICESIposted 8 years ago

   I think it is clear that we need a neutral commission to investigate Trump and Russia connection.  Nunes deliberately interfered to taint the investigation. His interference warrants an independent investigation.

   replyreport
   1. 86

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      its too big. republicans cant let it happen...what would they look like? as long as they have power, the charade lives on. unfortunate for them, there are others humans on this earth that arent duped by them. and TONS of incriminating info.tic toc

      replyreport
4. 82

   ptosisposted 8 years ago

   Keeps getting worse and worse day by day.  Nunes has got to go.
   
   U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., refused to say whether the White House asked him to scrap the hearing the testimony from Sally Yates, the former acting attorney general from Atlanta who refused to enforce President Donald Trump’s first travel ban and was later fired by Trump.
   
   It's a slow train wreck and this is just the beginning.

   replyreport
   1. 86

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      shakespeare comes to mind; "oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive". bad thing about lying, you have to keep track of your lies. put another way--its very hard keeping up a charade. especially when so many see it. tic toc

      replyreport
5. 50

   bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years ago

   There is no proof that there even needs to be an investigation. The DNC made the allegation that the Russians got into their servers, and yet they have not allowed the FBI or any government agency from actually verifying it by giving them their servers.
   
   There is zero evidence in the last nine months, so why are we still investigating this democrat spawned red herring. And if there was any influence in our election if was from Hillary and the DNC to cheat Sanders out of a contested democrat primary. This is an identifiable and verifiable issue pertaining to affecting the election process in the US.

   replyreport
   1. 86

      lovemychrisposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      youre not paying attention, brad.the dnc saw what was going on,but so did intel agencies,and plenty citizen journos.trump is under investigation,but so is page, nune,chaffetts and guliani just 4 start.alleged that chaffetts took 10 mil 4 comey letter

      replyreport
   2. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Zero evidence case closed.

      replyreport