Susan Rice ordered the "unmasking" of Trump transition team - is this proof of t

1. 85

   RJ Schwartzposted 7 years ago

   Susan Rice ordered the "unmasking" of Trump transition team - is this proof of team Obama spying?
   
   White House lawyers discovered that Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter - and based on the relaxed guidelines passed several years ago by Obama, doesn't appear to be illegal.  There will certainly be political fallout, but to what degree is debatable.
   
   

   replyreport
2. 78

   jackclee lmposted 7 years ago

   Susan Rice is the face of fake news. She orchestrated the whole Benghazi lie along with Ben Rhodes at the Obama White house. Instead of being chastised, she got a promotion. She and Obama and Clinton did a number on the American people and Congress. I am not surprised by the latest revelation.  When bad behavior is rewarded, guess what, you will get more bad behavior. She needs to be indicted and face real jail time. Perhaps she will see the light then...

   replyreport
   1. 85

      RJ Schwartzposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I noticed she went on MSNBC already to plead her case with her Liberal audience - I'd like to see her in front of Congress instead

      replyreport
   2. 82

      lovemychrisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      i want nunes! but its a total r gvt...so you win.

      replyreport
   3. 72

      Ken Burgessposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      A good read on the matter you would probably like Jack:
      https://medium.com/@Cernovich/susan-ric … 085b5cff16

      replyreport
   4. 82

      lovemychrisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      "condoms destroy pair bonding. when you raw dog and share your "super serum", she wont want anything else"-- mike cernovich. another macho d-wad aho.

      replyreport
3. 0

   Old Poolmanposted 7 years ago

   I can't believe that when Susan Rice hit all the Sunday talk shows about Benghazi she was unaware that what she was saying was a lie.  She of course received a promotion for willingly spreading the story about the video causing the attack at Benghazi.
   
   I have no doubt she was involved in some underhanded stuff regarding Trump and the election.

   replyreport
   1. 78

      jackclee lmposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I predict Susan Rice is not the main story here. She is just a pawn. She worked for President Obama. She did his bidding here and in the Benghazi affair. She was rewarded with promotion after she went on 5 talk shows and lied.

      replyreport
4. 82

   lovemychrisposted 7 years ago

   well well.....hows it feel? at least shes a gvt member  not russian intelligence. she went through legal channels, unlike wikileaks, who "unmasked" plenty.
   she must know of trumps criminal activity....as does anyone not under a rock. our country is in danger under trump/putin/netanyahu!

   replyreport
   1. 82

      lovemychrisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      geeeez. figures. this is standard procedure,given criminal status by a far right mouthpiece, who also pushed pizza-gate. fake news...who needs russia? we got rightys. the vast right wing strikes again.

      replyreport
   2. 78

      jackclee lmposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Will you ever stop beiing a partisan hack? The stuff Susan rice is doing is unamerican. I would think all people should stand up for the law. There is zero evident that Russia and Trump have any connection. It is a fabrication of media.

      replyreport
   3. 82

      lovemychrisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      oh bulloney. if you watched or read anything besides right wing trump-love,youd know better. page is singing.tweet tweet,and i dont mean twitter. stay tuned.

      replyreport
   4. 78

      jackclee lmposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Where do you get your news? Right wing does not mean anything any more than left wing bias... the important thing is getting at the truth. Unfortunately, you are too blinded to see it.

      replyreport
   5. 85

      RJ Schwartzposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Leslie - notice how you always seems to be on the wrong side of every debate?  Susan Rice is going down

      replyreport
   6. 82

      lovemychrisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      for what, being a democrat? she was national security advisor. had every right to ask for more info. im sure if a repub man did it, you'd all be high-fiving.

      replyreport
   7. 85

      RJ Schwartzposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      No, for being a flunkie of a lousy President - her credibility is near zero.

      replyreport
5. 72

   Ken Burgessposted 7 years ago

   There is plenty going on here, plenty remains to be seen, and for those that have difficulty seeing the big picture and seeing the web of events and how they interact, it will be all but impossible to piece it together.
   
   Never before has it been so clear that we are living in a Propaganda state, the other day, when this information about Rice and the Obama administration being directly responsible for the unmasking of Trump and his associates, and for spreading far and wide information meant to harm Trump and his supporters throughout the Intelligence Community; CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC... the MSM gave it NO COVERAGE at all.
   
   Eli Lake of Bloomberg reported Yesterday that:
   "The pattern of Rice’s requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government’s policy on “unmasking” the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally.
   
   Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like “U.S. Person One.” But in this case, the information was collected, and later disseminated throughout the Intelligence services [which required Obama and his cohorts to circumvent the law and classification rules on raw intelligence]."
   
   The Obama Administration wanted to push as much information they had gathered on Trump and his associates throughout the intelligence community, and to keep the reports at a relatively low classification level to ensure as wide a readership as possible across the government and, in some cases, among European (NATO) allies.
   
   They posted as much as possible to Intellipedia, a secret wiki used by American analysts to share information. Essentially what they did was wikileak everything they could gather on the incoming Administration, so that it would be available to use in the halls of D.C. against the incoming President.
   
   There was also an effort to pass reports and other sensitive materials to Congress. In one instance, the State Department sent a cache of documents marked “secret” to Senator Benjamin Cardin of Maryland days before the Jan. 20 inauguration.
   
   The intent is obvious, we have seen their intentions with the leaking of information on Flynn, and then Sessions, this was all planned... all a well devised effort to handicap, harass, and eventually 'overthrow' the Trump Presidency.
   
   But to understand the true depths of why they have made such efforts to tie this to Russia

   replyreport
   1. 72

      Ken Burgessposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      -CONT. one would have to understand all that transpired in the years prior, between the Obama Admin., Russia/Putin, Clinton, Podesta, etc. and why Iraq, Libya, Syria and now Russia were/are targeted for overthrow by America/NATO.

      replyreport
6. 51

   bradmasterOCcalposted 7 years ago

   she has some serious splaining to do, but when the left is involved there is little outrage, and no real chance of an investigation.
   
   But what the Heck was anyone in the Executive Office doing with this kind of classified information. Apparently, they didn't find out anything as nothing has come to light about Trump and his transition team.
   
   Congress is worried about Russian influence in our election, but they don't care about the Hillary Clinton and DNC influence on the election by cheating Sanders out of a contested primary.
   
   Or that the DNC spawned this idea of Russian hacking their DNC servers, yet, no government agency has been on their servers to Verify the DNC claim. How can we investigate the DNC claim of Russians when they won't give over their DNC servers to the FBI?

   replyreport