What's your thoughts on the Republicans using Harry Reid's nuclear option?

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (11 posts)
  1. RJ Schwartz profile image92
    RJ Schwartzposted 19 months ago

    What's your thoughts on the Republicans using Harry Reid's nuclear option?

    Mitch McConnell used the Nuclear Option today, virtually assuring Neil Gorsuch to be confirmed to the Supreme Court tomorrow.  Is this another example of how the Democrats are seeing their past tactics working against them, or do you think this was the wrong move by the Senators?  Try to be civil and present a valid argument instead of name calling and rhetoric.


  2. profile image78
    Hxprofposted 19 months ago

    This isn't surprising.  The level of distrust/dislike between the parties is, likely, at a record level, only surpassed by the Civil War animosity between the two, and both sides will, seemingly, do whatever is in their power to get what they want.  That said, I don't have a problem with EITHER party doing this - a majority is all that should be needed in the Senate anyway.

    1. Ken Burgess profile image90
      Ken Burgessposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Its a show... you have shills for the Corporations and Banks, on both sides, that make the rest of the 'honest' politicians ineffectual at getting things done of benefit, and right now those who are corrupt are trying hard to sabotage changes good fo

    2. profile image78
      Hxprofposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Ken, the problems of our country, and of the world for that matter, are beyond the ability of humans to solve.  I'd like to see Trump roll some things back, but I don't believe he'll make a substantial difference.

  3. profile image0
    Old Poolmanposted 19 months ago

    We have reached the point where neither party can actually say they have the best interests of this country at heart.  They are supposed to be representing us as part of a team, but there is no teamwork in Washington today unless they are out to get someone.  It is really sad that our elected representatives have sunk this low.

    The democrats left little choice with their obstructionism, but this decision will come back to haunt this country for many years to come.

    1. Ken Burgess profile image90
      Ken Burgessposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Yes indeed, that first sentence says it all.

  4. Carolyn M Fields profile image92
    Carolyn M Fieldsposted 19 months ago

    Yes, Democrats were very short-sighted in the past. What goes around, comes around. The shoe is on the other foot. Neil Gorsuch is extremely well qualified. There can be no other reason NOT to confirm him, other than politics. So yes, this was the right thing to do.
    I also agree that a majority should be all this is required.

    It is difficult to watch the news today. There is so much game playing. It's ridiculous.
    Quoting from the Chicago Tribune, "The American Bar Association, a group that is not known for leaning to the right in recent years, has bestowed its highest rating of "well-qualified" on Gorsuch, and, from some parts of the academy and even the higher reaches of former Democrat administrations, Gorsuch has been lauded as a judge of exceptional even-handedness, intelligence and wit. And yet, it is now clear that the Democrats in the Senate will mount a filibuster against the nomination, the first time this has ever been done for purely partisan reasons."

    1. Ken Burgess profile image90
      Ken Burgessposted 19 months agoin reply to this

      Yes, you can't watch the news anymore, not from the 'regular' sources... you have to go to Bloomberg or One America News to actually get news, not party arguments, not propaganda ... but actual events going on in the world other than spin material.

  5. Jackie Lynnley profile image89
    Jackie Lynnleyposted 19 months ago

    He made the rule and the Dems were all behind it. Can't cry baby now. They would surely planning to use it. Now let's find out who murdered the last one...like we don't all know who was behind that.
    Thank God the Democrats are not in charge. Only God knows what they had planned. We can all be sure is was not good and we still are fighting them and their dimwits daily!

  6. Wesman Todd Shaw profile image97
    Wesman Todd Shawposted 19 months ago

    It pretty much had to be done in order to fill the position. I'm just hoping one more seat is open under Trump, and another conservative Constitutional originalist is added under his administration.

  7. bradmasterOCcal profile image18
    bradmasterOCcalposted 19 months ago

    I think it was necessary to get him into SCOTUS.
    But my total picture view is that it has been shown that SCOTUS decisions, especially the simple majority decisions have not been effective decisions.

    The founders made the mistake of having congress create the details of the Judiciary branch. And when has congress done anything correctly.

    Using an odd number seems to be a way to break ties, but is that what a Law of the Land decision should be based on. The dissenting judges are just as qualified as the other judges. The more judges that agree the better the decision.

    Actually ties are good because they don't change the issues. If the SCOTUS decision is to be any good there would never be a tie.



This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)