Kavanaugh third accuser: What she alleges

1. 90

   IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

   Gang rape, spiked drinks, drugs..
   
   "I witnessed Brett Kavanaugh consistently engage in excessive drinking and inappropriate contact of a sexual nature with women during the early 1980s,"
   
   “I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”
   
   She alleges there are witnesses.
   
   This is a sworn declaration.
   
   Full statement:
   
   https://sc.cnbcfm.com/applications/cnbc … tement.pdf

   replyreport
   1. 68

      Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Anyone there, I have read the full declaration. All I have to say is that this is an American question and nothing else.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      RTalloniposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Anyone witnessing such a thing but not intervening is as guilty as anyone directly involved. To admit to being a witness to such a thing who did not intervene seems incredible.

      replyreport
      1. 70

         JAKE Earthshineposted 3 years agoin reply to this

         That's presumably why this Mark Judge character according to press reports, appears to be hiding out somewhere: Dr. Ford says he was present with Brett Kavanot at the scene of the alleged crime:
         
         "Who is Mark Judge, author of ‘Wasted’ and Brett Kavanaugh’s drinking buddy from school?"
         
         "The writer of Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk is alleged to have been present when the Supreme Court nominee committed sexual assault"
         
         https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united- … kavanaughs

         replyreport
2. 0

   Ed Fisherposted 3 years ago

   Prof. Ford , :
   " I don't remember how I got to the party "
   " I don't remember who was at the party "
   " I don't remember ow much I drank"
   " I don't remember other details of that night "
   " I only remember ow much this has affected my life "
   " I don't even want to be at this hearing "
   
   This isn't even a legal proceeding for the filing of any charges . It's a spectacle prepared for the public and promoted by the media . This is an ideological agenda by Diane Feinstein to halt the organized legal proceedings of nominating a supreme court justice "by hook or by crook " These hearings have been verbally obstructed from their beginning by senate panel political activists and that's all they are . Even the Lie detector was a joke , she was asked TWO questions , " Are you professor Ford ?" and " Are you being honest about  the statement that you gave ?"
   
   Nothing more than a Public Spectacle .

   replyreport
   1. 90

      IslandBitesposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah... This was not about Ford. Try again.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         Ed Fisherposted 3 years agoin reply to this

         It isn't about Ford  , It's about Feinstein and her party obstruction agenda , Ford is just a  victim of her own and her patry's politics .  If this hearing were legitimate AT ALL it wouldn't be political , it WOULD HAVE BEEN  a legal proceeding thirty six years ago . Today it's a media circus exploiting real women all across America !

         replyreport
         1. 75

            Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years agoin reply to this

            It is exploiting to kids.
            Note to self. BURN your high school journal!!!!! and year book!!!!

            replyreport
   2. 89

      mulberry1posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      In reference to your comments about Ford's memory. Isn't that how your memory of past events is? I recall high school graduation, I recall the weather and that it was in a gymnasium. I recall my gown and the fact I tripped going up the steps (emotional).  I don't recall many of the people there, exactly what day it was, what I ate beforehand, what time of day it was, etc.  You recall what had emotional significance. I think you are right it's not about deciding to file charges about this long ago crime(s), I think it is more about...is this person morally and ethically the type of person we think we want in a position of such power and importance.

      replyreport
      1. 75

         Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years agoin reply to this

         Especially, if he still drinks beer, etc. and has a secret life.
          
         
         It IS a job interview.

         replyreport
      2. 74

         Live to Learnposted 3 years agoin reply to this

         That's so sad. I feel for Dr. Ford. She evidently has some issues that required therapy. I don't doubt her belief that something happened to her somewhere, by someone, somehow. I don't trust her Swiss cheese memory enough to ruin a random individual's life. That's what this boils down to, with the evidence at hand. Her memory, without corroborating testimony, without any evidence to back it up, falls very, very short.

         replyreport
   3. 75

      Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, why don't they ask and reveal EXACTLY what night it was and where they both were that night.
      
      Nothing can be proved if Bret doesn't admit what happened.
      NOTHING
       
      and he won't, maybe because he honestly can't remember.

      replyreport
3. 90

   IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

   

   replyreport
   1. 68

      Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, I agreed. But what can be more fundamental than reading? Those who read daily, not just now and then. Thank you.

      replyreport
4. 0

   Ed Fisherposted 3 years ago

   No prosecutor in 1981 or in 2018 would be likely " to touch this case with a 12 foot pole " ,  Politicians however get down in the pig troughs  and roll in it    , the news media pundits suck it up like $25.00 lattes , the under informed, likely non voting  public laps it up like a Jerry Springer show ..........
   
   The rest of us know it changes nothing unless Kavanaugh drops out from the spectacle of character assassination or is voted down and THAT is the liberal agenda , Anybody thinks for a minute that liberals care about one Prof. Ford ? 
   
   You're ideologically delusional .

   replyreport
   1. 82

      Don Wposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      "No prosecutor in 1981 or in 2018 would be likely"
      
      You can't be certain of that. The only way to be certain, is for their to be a thorough and objective investigation.

      replyreport
      1. 95

         wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

         You've got to be kidding.  "Sometime approximately 30-40 years ago there was an attempted rape - go file suit against the person that a single person accuses".  And you think it would happen based on that?!?

         replyreport
         1. 82

            Don Wposted 3 years agoin reply to this

            If the FBI say they can't find sufficient evidence, fine. We won't know that without an investigation though.

            replyreport
            1. 95

               wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

               "You've got to be kidding.  "Sometime approximately 30-40 years ago there was an attempted rape - go spend a million dollars and 5 years (or at least until after the midterm elections) and investigate a claim of violence sometime between 35 and 37 years ago somewhere around Wash. DC.  And you think it should be done and will produce (truthful) results...that will then be used in this nasty political game the Democrats are engaged in.
               
               They had their chance 6 weeks ago to ask for an investigation.  They chose to play games; don't cry when it doesn't work.  If you don't like it personally, demand that Feinstein either do her job or get out of the chair.

               replyreport
5. 90

   IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

   
   
   
   All the previous communications:
   
   https://www.dropbox.com/s/lml8t9zjpske6 … g.pdf?dl=0

   replyreport
   1. 68

      Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      This is still an American question. A private affair has blown publicly. Thank you all.

      replyreport
   2. 70

      JAKE Earthshineposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Michael Avenatti is determined to uncover the entire hidden truth about everything, from the Bozo Trump's Campaign / Russian cover up to the Kavanaugh cover up and why he refuses to ask for an FBI investigation and why he apparently refuses to take a polygraph test:
      
      Don't be surprised if Avenatti files criminal charges against Brett:

      replyreport
      1. 68

         Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

         While, America, that's your affairs at the moment. I can make my contributions when the international scenario opens up. Thank you, America.

         replyreport
      2. 75

         Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years agoin reply to this

         Thanks for the cake. Got any ice-cream?

         replyreport
         1. 68

            Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

            Thanks for the response. Ice cream? Yes, but later. Thanks again.

            replyreport
6. 90

   IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

   Michael Avenatti
   
   @MichaelAvenatti
   2h2 hours ago
   
   Because  @realDonaldTrump and the Senate Republicans refuse to allow my client Julie Swetnick to testify, we will be taking her story directly to the American people this weekend. This is about a search for the truth. Details to follow.

   replyreport
   1. 68

      Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Hi, all, good to know. I'll add some ice cream along.

      replyreport
      1. 75

         Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years agoin reply to this

         

         replyreport
         1. 68

            Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

            Hi, Kathryn, ready and back for the ice cream? Sorry, I do not know you like it much. Okay, as soon as the news unfolds. Good day.

            replyreport
            1. 75

               Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years agoin reply to this

               can't eat cake without it.
                 or lots of icing...

               replyreport
               1. 68

                  Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

                  Good to know.

                  replyreport
                  1. 75

                     Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years agoin reply to this

                     yep.

                     replyreport
7. 90

   IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

   

   replyreport
8. 93

   Glenis Rixposted 3 years ago

   I don’t believe that anyone as intelligent as Professor Feinstein would have put herself through such an horrendous ordeal for political reasons. The Judge Ford may or may not be a reformed character now but I believe that he did it. He should own it and take the consequences.

   replyreport
9. 93

   Glenis Rixposted 3 years ago

   Sorry! Brain scrambled - it’s 4 am here and I can’t sleep. I of course was referring to Judge Kavanaugh and Prof Ford it’s headline news here in the UK. Goodnight xx

   replyreport
10. 75

    Kathryn L Hillposted 3 years ago

    too dry.

    replyreport
    1. 68

       Miebakagh57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

       Really? I think many are trying to avoid a sex scandal that with soil their white linens. No good boy or girl dare that. Thanks.

       replyreport
11. 90

    IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

    Michael Avenatti
    @MichaelAvenatti
    
    Be clear: 1. I CANNOT just walk my client into an FBI office. We tried that. They claim they don’t have jurisdiction and they refuse to take a stmt. 2. While we may file a criminal complaint, that will have no bearing on any vote due to timing. We will proceed with other options.

    replyreport
    1. 95

       wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

       1.  True, the FBI did not have jursidiction (which every lawyer should now).  Past tense; they do now.  Try it again.
       
       2.  And we see the truth - timing requires no vote until after mid terms, when there may be a democratic majority.  All about politics, isn't it, and not truth, honesty or anything but political power.

       replyreport
       1. 70

          JAKE Earthshineposted 3 years agoin reply to this

          wilderness, your concern for the 'truth, honesty and politics' is just precious: So, given your genuine concern, you must be outraged that 'Granny' McConnell through his corrupt political and criminal motive, held a supreme court position OPEN for approximately 1 year during President Obama's tenure and now republicans are crying because this beattie eyes Brett KavaNOT disaster has lasted only a few months:

          replyreport
          1. 0

             Ed Fisherposted 3 years agoin reply to this

             Oh,  so dirty tricks CAN'T be played by Conservatives too ?

             replyreport
          2. 95

             wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

             Ahh.  The old "He did it, so it is right that I do it too!"  As an excuse it isn't bad - as a statement of ethics it can't be any worse.
             
             Children squabbling in the sandbox, with zero care about anything but their personal power.

             replyreport
12. 0

    Ed Fisherposted 3 years ago

    It's amazing and interesting where political conversations go or more to my point , DON'T go .  No one discusses Michael Avenatti and his mission statement here ,   Mr. ".......I may run for the white house myself ........."Avenatti.
    
    I always get interested when in politics and media I begin seeing the same faces in high profile cases . Sometimes  the motives get a little muddied in the water that should be very clear.
    
    Tells me all I need to know.

    replyreport
13. 90

    IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

    

    replyreport
14. 90

    IslandBitesposted 3 years ago

    In an exclusive interview with NBC News' Kate Snow, Julie Swetnick describes being attacked at a party that was attended by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. While Swetnick cannot confirm that Brett Kavanaugh was one of her attackers, she does say that she knows both Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge were at the party before the attack. NBC News has not been able to independently corroborate Swetnick's claims.
    
    https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/julie … raila&

    replyreport