Are you for it or against? Why?
One of the Scandinavian countries seriously considered it recently. They turned it down because it would make their country a tremendous magnet for people that don't want to work.
But I also see it as a huge encouragement to those that are happy to live off the efforts of others. One day we may be at the point that robotics produces all our wants and needs, but until that time what a person builds/produces belongs to them; not to a couch potato that doesn't wish to build anything themselves.
At the same time it encourages living off of charity, it discourages hard work and effort, for it mostly goes to support those that choose not to participate in that work.
As a whole, then, it is non-productive and can serve mostly to degrade a country and its people.
I'm against it. You don't work, you don't eat. That's it.
What of the veteran that is a quadriplegic as a result of defining your freedom? What of the child incapable of feeding themselves, either physically or financially? The elderly too weak to work?
We need a safety net for the unfortunate in our lives. We do NOT need a guaranteed income for everyone.
would you give free money to a single mother who can work but doesn't?
Probably not, though circumstances might dictate it happen.
Making an error in judgement does not relieve one of the consequences of that error.
Makes sense to me. The only problem is deciding who can't and who won't; fraud is so common as to be accepted as normal today.
Fraud? In what context?
Claiming an inability to work when quite able to. It is a major problem in this country with disability payments, and the single biggest reason that people who truly ARE disabled have such a tough time getting help.
You gave an example yourself with the single mother that could work but won't.
Is there a "major problem" with disability fraud? How do you know that? got any statistics to back that up/? Any links or anything like that?
Nope - no links. Just a long history of seeing them. You'll have to research it yourself. Check both welfare and insurance fraud. You might look into disability payments by the military as well; they have a history of searching hard for anything they can call a partial disability and assign lifetime payments to.
I wouldn't worry about the military. They'll do anything to deny benefits. Lying, among them.
Well I haven't researched it. But I do know it is VERY HARD to get disability, at least the people I know who have real disabilities and have tried to get it. Why would anyone WANT to live off 700 bucks a month if they could work and make a lot more?
Because they are lazy. Because it is easier. Because they can do it while working "under the table". In some cases, because they can draw it while holding a full time, good paying job.
But yes, I know it is very difficult. I know one man with brain damage and that cannot hold a job that it took 5 years to get help. In the meantime his parents, in their 80's and one packing an oxygen tank everywhere, worked to support themselves and him. It is absolutely shameful what we do to those that are truly disabled.
What about you, are you for it or against it?
As a nation, I think it would be one of the worst things we could do.
No. I think it would cause more problems than it would solve.
I have to be basically against that idea and don't believe that we have to go that far in this society to work toward a less unequal economic environment here.
Free Income proves one out agenda for sure , everything for free IS the dream of those on the left , health care ,rent , income , education , travel , food , living expenses , small business subsidies ...... Have we not said this a million times and had liberals defend against the statement ?
Them ;"We want Free stuff !"
I don't think anyone should go without food and shelter but I also think you should give something in return for what you get. I'm not inclined to support the idea of handing out free money. We've been doing that for a while and look where it's gotten is.
We HAVE safety nets in America and we almost always have had them , in fact more now than ever . A hundred and fifty or two hundred years ago the wealthier people in towns and cities ,had to support the "paupers " by law . Usually they were the doctors , attorneys , etc... who had to provide assistances .
Now ? Unlimited support for the needy .
Yet there seems to be no fairness patterns in SSI disability allocation , we see fake abusers all the time and as you describe those who can't seem to catch a break and truly deserve it ?
Where's the policing ?
by CC 18 months ago
I used to think this would really help people, but now I think it is a horrible idea. Especially for the economy and society in general. Covid has been a real eye opener. Paying people not to work, well, they then don't work, and they get lazy and don't go back to work. What are your thoughts on...
by ga anderson 3 years ago
*hard sun's apparent support for Yang's Freedom Dividend sparked my interest in a discussion of it.The basics: Yang's idea is basically best described as a Universal Basic Income—free unconditioned money, (except for a minimum age), from the governmentIt is not a new idea, it has been proposed and...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 6 years ago
As of yesterday, Swiss voted rejected the proposal for a guaranteed basic income. However, there are those who believe that everyone should have a basic income. They further assert that w/increasing automation & computerization, there will be LESS jobs in the future. ...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 7 years ago
What do you think about the proposed implementation of basic income(in some parts of Europe) for people whether they work or not? Do you contend that eventually the United States will implement basic income policy? Why? Why not?
by Tessa Schlesinger 3 years ago
A few hundred years ago, the church and the state had a filthy habit of killing and imprisoning people because they didn't agree with the current king or the current pope. As a result of the Enlightenment, 'freedom of speech' came into being. It meant that the State and the Church couldn't imprison...
by Nikki Khan 5 years ago
Another U-turn by Conservatives on Universal Credit,which is going to be a relief sense for all the people who suffered for last 7 years,because of this universal credit.Of course,credit goes to Mr Jeremy Corbyn,thanks to him for all the effort.
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|