Do you believe that individuals, not the government be responsible for their own retirement? Do you believe that social security as a program should be done away with?
Hello, gm that's absurd. Why should it be done away with? Every employee on engagement is offered a social security pact with the employer whether be it a government agency or private corporation. Why then the need or call to do away with the contract?
Is this not taking too much on your part? So, let sleeping dogs lie, and thanks.
No, workers are not offered a pact with their employer. Rather, they are REQUIRED to participate in a pact with politicians, wherein they pay money into a retirement account and the politician either takes it for their own purposes or, at best, "borrows" it at the lowest possible interest rate. There is no fiduciary oversight at all; the funds the government collected to support you in your old age is treated as an open grab bag for government to use.
I'm not against a forced savings, but it should be a savings, controlled by the person who will benefit from it, rather than simply handed to a politician who doesn't care if it grows or withers.
Hello, wilderness, sad to note are the real facts you state here. Actually, employers or government especially is to blame for this development. You fearlessly speak the truth. Thanks, and enjoy the mid-week.
Employers do nothing but gather the required monies from your earnings and forward it to the government as SS taxes.
But many employers offer a second retirement fund - one that the employee controls and cannot be taken by politicians. In general, if an employee chooses to contribute to that fund they will have far more income as a senior than SS will give them. Were SS funds invested in at a reasonable return, most people would be a multi, multi millionaire by retirement; instead they must depend on their own and employer plans to have a comfortable retirement.
Maybe you need decent governments. That takes a little genuine democracy, of course.
Giving it all away in tax breaks to the rich is not going to work.
Electing billionaire shysters is definitely unhelpful, lol.
We desperately need a decent government, yes. We need leaders that can work together to produce a better country. We need leaders that are more concerned about the country than they are themselves. We need leaders that put America first, not last.
I know, I know. Always force the few to pay for what the many want but don't want to pay for. It is the socialist way...a way that produces poverty and violence, and that can be seen in every country that goes down that road too far.
So well said, and surprising it appears so many Americans are unaware how their SS funds are misused.
In my opinon, it should not be done away with. It should not be a free for all piggybank. American's have paid into it from its conception, and the funds should have been used for what they were created for. It worked very well for many years, until it became a piggybank... It's now in trouble due to depleted funds and "go figure" now some want to further burden SS and develop socialized insurance. Just wonder how we would ever pay for one for all insurance?
Once again, look no further than the destructive, anti-American topic of this discussion to find out WHY the Major Social Media Sites are now BANNING Clowny McTrump's nationalists:
There is NO ISSUE with social security but be assured, if Bozo Trump and the Communist Russian Loving Republican Congress-persons are allowed to roam the halls of our capitol buildings for much longer with impunity, they will find a way to cripple Social Security and Medicare, the two life-lines of our retired folks: IMPEACH Now: INDICT Now before it's late:
It IS convincing...until you look behind the claims to find truth.
The SS program is a giant ponzi scheme, using contributions of current members to pay past contributors.
The SS program is paying out sums that are based not on what was contributed, but on what congress authorizes. This results in cost of living "increases" that are less than what congress authorizes as an increase in medicaid - in 5 years I have seen my check increase just once, but the cost of living rose every year.
We find increasing numbers of people receiving SS checks that never paid in, or paid in far less than they will receive.
The SS fund will be empty in just a few years; again a total lack of fiduciary responsibility on the part of Congress, which has consistently "borrowed" from it at the lowest possible interest rather than attempting to find the highest rate of return for that money.
So it sounds really nice to say there is no problem, but the truth is that there is nothing BUT problems.
by Ralph Deeds 6 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opini … ef=opinionSocial Security, Present and FutureBy THE EDITORIAL BOARDPublished: March 30, 2013 6 Comments"In the fight over the federal budget deficit, Social Security has so far been untouched. That may soon change.Today's Editorials"In last...
by SparklingJewel 7 years ago
I would be interested to hear opposition to the stated "facts" in this video...Has anyone done an extensive research on the origins of Social Security?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4BjLrTq … r_embedded
by SparklingJewel 8 years ago
"The vision of getting something for nothing, or getting something that someone else has to pay for, explains why so many Americans are duped by politicians. A congressional hoax that's flourished for seven decades is the Social Security hoax that half of the Social Security tax (6.2 percent)...
by JAKE Earthshine 7 weeks ago
Everyone knew this atrocious scheme by Donald Trump was coming sooner or later, and we must Thank the Good LORD “Powerhouse” Nancy Pelosi and her new Progressive Democratic House of Representatives were voted in during the last midterm election and can now OBSTRUCT & Halt Trump’s and his...
by weholdthesetruths 8 years ago
Pretty Panther said in another place... many Tea Party candidates (and you yourself here on these forums) have professed their disdain for popular government programs such as Social Security. You have advocated the dismantling of a major proportion of government. That is a common...
by OLYHOOCH 6 years ago
A History Lesson on Your Social Security Card1934 - 1980With the elections just a little over 3 months away you'll soon be hearing some Democrats running for political office, warning how the Republicans want to take away the old people's Social Security. Just in...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|