Black Identity Extremists? Never heard of them

Jump to Last Post 1-1 of 1 discussions (57 posts)
  1. Credence2 profile image79
    Credence2posted 5 weeks ago

    ( So guess who just became public enemy no 1.)

    Newsweek Article banner headline

    FBI RANKS 'BLACK IDENTITY EXTREMISTS' BIGGER THREAT THAN AL QAEDA, WHITE SUPREMACISTS: LEAKED DOCUMENTS

    Leaked FBI documents indicate "black identity extremists" and animal rights activists are among the agency's top counterterrorism priorities under President Donald Trump.

    The FBI's priority list documents, obtained by The Young Turks Thursday, lay out the Bureau's 2018 fiscal year focal points in counterterrorism, cyber crime and counterintelligence.

    The 2018-19 "Threat Guidance" documents describe black identity extremists (BIEs) as those who "use force or violence in violation of criminal law in response to perceived racism and injustice in American society." The files claimed some BIEs acted in hopes of "establishing a separate black homeland or autonomous black social institutions, communities or governing organizations within the USA."


    An internal FBI report from August 2017 was widely criticized for using the BIE label, which many called racist. But the Consolidated Strategy Guide documents leaked this week show the FBI kept the term and made BIEs one of its top counterterrorism priorities.

    Under the Trump administration, they're considered a bigger threat than terror groups such as Al Qaeda.

    "Animal rights/environmental extremists" and "anti-authority extremists" were also deemed top existential threats.
    ---------------
    Why must white and the renown institutions they control, continue to torment us so?

    Background article:

    https://www.newsweek.com/fbi-leak-black … at-1453362


    These are the kinds of thing that keep us apart in 2019 and will continue to keep us at odds with one another because of these continued assaults.

    I don't see body counts associated with BIE or animal activists? The body counts are with right wing white supremists, and to a lesser extent within the U.S., Al Qaida.

    So why create this demon? Some extreme way to stop Black dissent regarding the current system?

    And people want me to believe that Trump's attitude is racially neutral?

    The Right is going to attempt to obfuscate and call it fake news, but this information has come from many sources. So, I ask the Right and Conservatives,"WHY"

    1. Live to Learn profile image82
      Live to Learnposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      This is cool. As much outrage as the average white person expresses when they feel the 'white supremacist' label is being used to falsely identify groups not associated with 'white supremacy'.

      But, seriously. I'd like to see the statistics and the data. What constitutes a BIE? What crimes would be associated with BIE statistics. It does sound a little crazy. I'd like more info, if it's not politically incorrect to want to understand better.

      I just looked it up. It appears it was an overreaction to rhetoric coming out of the BLM movement. It appears they were told it was ill advised. Not sure that stands. It was 2 years ago.

      1. Credence2 profile image79
        Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        Mislabel aside white supremacy does exist and has a corresponding body count how do a non-existent entity like BIE compare?

        As to what crimes, do they considerblack on black crime as qualifying?there has been no organized movement, so what are we talking. BLM is a form of dissent that I welcome but has come without homicides, how do Islamic violence or white supremacists compare?

        Why would the FBI see them as such a Preeminent threat?

        This is one hell of an overreaction without any basis in reality.

        And after a time the designation BIE was removed according to info provided by Panther, but how did it get to this level in the first place?

        1. Live to Learn profile image82
          Live to Learnposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          As I said, I had never heard of the term and it seemed a little crazy. I did look it up and shared what I found.

          Take it for whatever you want to.

          1. Credence2 profile image79
            Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

            I have heard it mentioned before but quickly dismissed as unsupported. Thanks for sharing what you did find.

        2. GA Anderson profile image91
          GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          I think you are right bud - the dangers of the White Supremacist should never be minimized. Whether they are a splintered faction or a unified movement, they are deadly dangerous.

          But, my perception, from recollection, is that right after the BLM movement burst onto the scene there was a lot of very disturbing and potentially threatening rhetoric associated with the movement. Granted it only took a little investigation to learn that the "bad folks" of the movement were extremist factions, but still, they tainted the movement.

          GA

          1. Credence2 profile image79
            Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

            BLM was a picnic compared to the groups that Trump wanted us to ignore. I don't recall any real issue beyond their widespread dissent against the current administration and the system in general. Yes, I know that in the eyes of many that made them dangerous, but from our side they were heroes.

            How does "rhetoric"  compare with or rise to the level of murderous assault?

            The "extremist factions" if any in BIE were school boys compared with mildest of white supremacist. How dare the FBI try to make the two appear equivalent.

            1. GA Anderson profile image91
              GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

              You don't recall the extreme comments of the BLM factions that arose after the original BLM organization became known? Would it do any good to search past forum threads, (as I recall), where you condemned them and agreed that the factions were not the essence of the BLM movement?

              None of this is meant to diminish the dangers and rhetoric of the White Supremacist groups, but it is meant to delineate when the BIE first became an FBI issue. So far, all sources predate its origin to the Trump administration.

              Do you still want to blame it on Pres. Trump's "racist attitude"?

              GA

              1. Credence2 profile image79
                Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

                Of course, I am against extremism from all sources, but do you really believe that the rhetoric of BLM rose to the levels of real violence perpetrated by white supremists or Islamic groups? But in Trumps FBI, that is what you were led to believe.

                1. GA Anderson profile image91
                  GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

                  "Trump's FBI"? Come on bud, think of that first year. Do you really want to label Comey's FBI as Trump's FBI?

                  Do Peter Stork, Ohr, the anti-Trump internal FBI email exchanges, the controversy over what the FBI rank and file really thought about Pres. Trump ring a bell with you?

                  Is that 2017 FBI the "Trump FBI" you speak of?

                  Come on bud, think back. 2017 was so full of headlines about Trump's relationship with the FBI that it is incredible that you would consider Comey's FBI to be Trump's FBI.

                  I would be hard-pressed to think of any reporting of the 2017 FBI as being supportive of the President. Yet, even so, you still want to claim Comey's FBI curtsied to the president and adopted this new BIE stance. Geesh.

                  As a side note; No I don't see any comparison of the BLM rhetoric with the worst White Supremacist rhetoric. But that is not the point of the conversation. I don't even think I can find any validity with the FBI's BIE position. However, that isn't the issue. The issue is you blaming Trump for something that strongly appears to predate his administration.

                  GA

                  1. PrettyPanther profile image85
                    PrettyPantherposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

                    Since you weighed in on one of my discussions....

                    When an employee is at odds with the boss but wants to keep his job, that employee often chooses his battles, deciding to accept odious policies or orders so as to maintain a semblance of cooperation. It is possible that Comey did this, and more than once. If Comey was the one who came up with the designation, why did it take him three years?

                    I find credence's take on the matter to be reasonable.

    2. PrettyPanther profile image85
      PrettyPantherposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      Not sure how this figures into the mix:

      Dated July 24, 2019:  FBI abandons use of term "Black Identity Extremism"

      1. Credence2 profile image79
        Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        It figures well, , the article I quoted may well be dated. But this designation for BIE has been in place for a long period without any real basis for it supplanting far more virulent sources of violence.

      2. GA Anderson profile image91
        GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        It figures as an example of the power of the PC movement. Whether the policy is right or wrong seems to matter less than whether it is articulated correctly.

        GA

      3. gmwilliams profile image84
        gmwilliamsposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        The FBI is finally being aware that Caucasian extremists are dangerous in light of the massive shootings.  Black so-called extremists aren't as dangerous-for the most part, they want Black empowerment.

        1. lovetherain profile image73
          lovetherainposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          People are people. Why are you dividing them? All humans are evil.

        2. lovetherain profile image73
          lovetherainposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          All MEN are six feet tall.

    3. promisem profile image97
      promisemposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      "The FBI has also begun using "Racially Motivated Extremism" as a watered-down label for white nationalists groups." - from the article

      It's interesting that blacks on the target list have become "Black Identity Extremists" but the whites have recently take on the label of "Racially Motivated Extremism".

      Seems to me that if you are going to have Black Identity Extremists the FBI should also have White Identity Extremists.

      1. Credence2 profile image79
        Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        Promisem, It just appears that the current administration wants to exaggerate the threat posed by blacks and minimize thos presented by the white Right Extremists who simply through the virulence and frequency of violence and past record of such deserve the greater level of  attention and scrutiny.

        1. PrettyPanther profile image85
          PrettyPantherposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          I agree that it appears that way.

        2. promisem profile image97
          promisemposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          That does seem so. I also think the "anti-authority extremists" sounds suspiciously like anyone who opposes Trump.

    4. Don W profile image83
      Don Wposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      Here is a breakdown of domestic extremist terrorism in 2018:

      https://hubstatic.com/14637229_f1024.jpg
      https://hubstatic.com/14637228_f1024.jpg
      https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ … n+2018.pdf

      1. Credence2 profile image79
        Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        I fail to realize why people consistently make terrorist comparisons and source and nature as six=half a dozen?

        I don't find any BIE statistics anywhere supporting it being a preeminent threat while white supremacy is a modest threat? How could that be?

        The statistics ring loud and clear, who would dare to dispute the clear direction these attacks have been taking?

        But I have an idea or two as to who might.....

        1. GA Anderson profile image91
          GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          "But I have an idea or two as to who might....."

          How does that thought hold up when the mentioned timelines are considered?

          Are you thinking that the FBI was Trumpian racist before Trump?

          Or are you saying that the FBI was just regular white-man racist before Trump?

          GA

          1. Credence2 profile image79
            Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

            My point, GA, is that the offending term and those events that were to be considered part of the new designation of BIE was created smack dab during the Era of Trump, even though a past event was included to help define this "new" category of terrorist activity

            1. GA Anderson profile image91
              GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

              "Smack dab" Usually intended to mean right in the middle of something. Yet the truth of your "smack dab" is 7 months into the new administration and done by a confirmed anti-Trump FBI director.

              That just doesn't work for me Cred. If it had been further into his administration, (I don't see this as a first 100 days priority), and done by what could be considered more of a 'Trump man' FBI director, then I might not be so adamant in my thoughts. But, given the early time frame and Comey as FBI director, I just don't see it.

              To follow your thought demands that Comey be seen as a Trump man. Is that your impression of him?

              GA

    5. GA Anderson profile image91
      GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      Color me surprised Cred. I have never heard of this before.

      But I am not surprised that this is being laid on Pres. Trump, and his administration's doorstep.

      Starting with your comment; "And people want me to believe that Trump's attitude is racially neutral?" and the following comments in this thread, would I be way off-base to perceive this inference, (and outright declarations), that this is a Pres. Trump-driven issue?

      I couldn't be sure, so I took a quick look at the history of the "BIE" issue.

      I didn't find enough to offer a conclusive opinion, but I did find enough to offer some food for thought.

      One of the sources I have seen you rely on, Salon.com, offers this BIE thing as a post-Fergusson, (2014), happening:

      "Leaked documents show FBI targeted post-Ferguson "black identity extremists" over white supremacists"

      That is just the article title, but the article does seem to date the FBI BIE designation to the Obama administration.

      Then, An article for the theintercept.com also noted the post-Fergusson focus: (I am not endorsing the authority of this site, it just came up in the search)

      "Three years later, the FBI listed Davis’s case in a secret memo warning of the rise of a “black identity extremist” movement whose members’ “perceptions of police brutality against African Americans” spurred what the FBI claimed was “an increase in premeditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement.”

      Granted it does say "three years later," which would be 2017, (Trump's administration), but it was referring to a 2014 event and it's inference is that this FBI focus was pre-Trump administration.

      Further, our semi-dependable Wikipedia mentions an August 2017 FBI report using the BIE designation. This would be 7 months into the Trump administration, and, James Comey was the FBI director.

      I know all of that seems like a lot of Don W.-type citations, but it seems here lately that a contrary opinion is just stuff if it isn't supported, so I just offered it as support for my thoughts that this may be an FBI developed issue rather than a Trump administration directive.

      I can't offer anything conclusive, but is that enough food for thought to prompt consideration that this BIE issue has nothing to do with Pres. Trump or his administration directives?

      GA

      1. Credence2 profile image79
        Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        GA,

        I won't use Salon as a sole source for information, but I will use it to find other more mainstream sources to corroborate it.

        From Salon:
        According to previous guides, the FBI believes that the threat originated from the Black Lives Matter movement in response to the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

        “The FBI judges BIE perceptions of police brutality against African Americans have likely motivated acts of pre-meditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement,” the 2018 guide said. “The FBI first observed this activity following the August 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and the subsequent acquittal of police officers involved in that incident.”


        The 2018 guide also revealed that the FBI intended to counter the threat of black identity extremists with an operation called IRON FIST, which included undercover operatives:
        -------------
        I counter with this definition of the date and origin of the term, I think that the Ferguson events were considered part and parcel of BIE retroactively.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_I … Extremists

        We are talking about early 2017, where at least according to Wikipedia, this all got started.

        1. GA Anderson profile image91
          GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          Well, it seems you agree that the 2014 Fergusson event and BLM were a starting point of the BIE focus. (an Obama administration time-frame)

          What about Comey being the FBI director in 2017 when the first Trump administration links were made? Do you think Comey was a Trump administration lackey?

          "I counter with this definition of the date and origin of the term, I think that the Ferguson events were considered part and parcel of BIE retroactively."

          I agree. That is also why I think some thought should be given to that point before painting this as a Trump administration directive.

          Is that still your thought, even after the point you made, that Trump is responsible for this FBI BIE issue?

          GA

          1. Credence2 profile image79
            Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

            Yes, Trump is responsible because these events that occurred in 2014 and they were not designated as BIE until 3 years later. Who assigned this fictional designation? You know who, and his last name was not Obama. Was there even such a definition for the events associated with BLM or kneeling protests until 2017? Trump's attempts to demonize Black people is a continued source of distrust against him specifically and the GOP in general.

            Trump needed to draw attention from the violence associated with his kindred White supremacists by attempting to create a status for violent terrorism from Blacks who were mostly in stages on dissent, not promoting violence.

            This is not supported even from the Wildest of imagination. It is worse than J. Edgar during the Civil Rights Era.
            .

            1. GA Anderson profile image91
              GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

              It sounds like you think Comey was a Trump lackey. How else can you justify his FBI adopting the BIE stance in 2017?

              Are you really ignoring references to the 2014 Fergusson time-frame as a point of importance?

              Is that really the position you want to take, Comey as a Trump flunky just following whatever directive the administration sent down? The same Comey that leaked classified info to prompt a Trump investigation? That Comey?

              Come on Cred, give that some thought.

              GA

              1. Credence2 profile image79
                Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

                I think that we a speaking past each other. BIE is a Trump invention, and if you wanted to keep working for Trump, you had better get on board.

                It is convenient to use 2014 as a frame of reference, but the Obama administration did not see fit to create another status or designation of terrorist on account of it. We had to wait for Trump to do that.

                I can't speak to the motives of Comey and what would drive him at any stage of his career when defending himself against the disloyalty of his boss. Perhaps, what was considered offensive to Minorities was the least of his concerns. Accommodation in such a way is not an unheard of  concept in race relations.

                1. GA Anderson profile image91
                  GA Andersonposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

                  Okay bud. I don't think we are "speaking past each other," I think you are wedded to a position. Contrary information is non-conclusive, and that appears enough for you. So I will leave you to it.

                  I disagree. I can't imagine Comey inventing this BIE thing because of a Pres. Trump directive. Apparently, you can. So be it.

                  GA

                  1. IslandBites profile image85
                    IslandBitesposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

                    Do we know Comey invented the BIE thing?

                    I haven't found anything other than the 12-page report, prepared by the F.B.I. Domestic Terrorism Analysis Unit in August, 2017 and leaked in October 2017.

                    Comey was fired in May, 2017.

                    And now the leaked 2018-19 "Threat Guidance".

                  2. Credence2 profile image79
                    Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

                    Virtually everysource, as mentioned by Islandbites below, takes us to 2017. Why are you clinging to 2014 as the year? Take a look at the Wikipedia link and the footnotes that show other sources in regards to this matter, do you see 2014 anywhere?

                    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/opin … trump.html

                    Here is a 2017 NYT article to help support my position.

    6. Eastward profile image93
      Eastwardposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      It would seem the FBI has some very twisted priorities. The situation in Yemen might be one reason they are moving Al Qaeda down the list:

      https://www.newsweek.com/trump-inadvert … men-589384

    7. gmwilliams profile image84
      gmwilliamsposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      Credence, heard of this inanity years ago.   It is so oxymoronic that the FBI are threatened by so-called Black extremists who are relatively harmless.  These so-called Black extremists want to uplift the Black community educationally, culturally & socioeconomically.  However, Caucasian extremists such as the Ku Klux Klan are far more dangerous than any so-called Black extremist groups.   The Ku Klux Klan has caused more terrorism but the FBI refuse to acknowledge this.  There is definitely a DOUBLE standard here.   Hoover implemented the dangerousness of the so-called Black extremists while IGNORING Caucasian extremists.

      1. Credence2 profile image79
        Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        I have heard of them too, only in passing. All this talk about separatism and a homeland?

        Even the Black Panthers during the 1960's and 1970's were not as dangerous nor responsible for such dreadful body counts among their adversaries as these groups that the FBI designated as only "moderate" threats.

    8. TessSchlesinger profile image92
      TessSchlesingerposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

      What I find interesting is the talk of creating a'homeland.' it's the second time I have heard it in two days _ associated with different minority groups.

      The term originates (as far as I know) from apartheid South Africa created different homeland for the different tribes...

      1. Credence2 profile image79
        Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

        As for the idea of creating a homeland, I certainly am not aware of any organized effort by (Blacks) in this country to pursue such an objective.

        The existence of BIE and their associated characteristics are a complete fabrication by the FBI through its ultimate higher authority, "Donald J. Trump".

        1. aware profile image67
          awareposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          The term African American

          1. Credence2 profile image79
            Credence2posted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

            Thanks...

            1. TessSchlesinger profile image92
              TessSchlesingerposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

              Nope.

              https://www.dictionary.com/browse/homeland

              South African and Palestinian. If African Americans are using it, it is not from them originally.

              Etymology from 1660 - English.

            2. TessSchlesinger profile image92
              TessSchlesingerposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

              Nope.

              https://www.dictionary.com/browse/homeland

              South African and Palestinian. If African Americans are using it, it is not from them originally.

              Etymology from 1660 - English.

              The word, in the context it is being used in the article, is the same as an Indian reservation. It is land set aside for one ethnic or tribe minority.

          2. TessSchlesinger profile image92
            TessSchlesingerposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

            Just checked out the etymology. 1660 English term from 400 years ago originally.

            Used by Palestinians and South Africans.

            https://www.dictionary.com/browse/homeland

        2. TessSchlesinger profile image92
          TessSchlesingerposted 5 weeks agoin reply to this

          +

        3. TessSchlesinger profile image92
          TessSchlesingerposted 4 weeks agoin reply to this

          That is what I thought.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)