How Do We Stop Child Pornography?

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (21 posts)
  1. crankalicious profile image95
    crankaliciousposted 13 months ago

    I thought I'd create a forum page on a topic other than Trump Sucks! Trump is Great!

    I was listening to NPR yesterday and they had this really interesting story. To sum it up, this couple's daughter had been sexually abused by her biological father when she was very young. The scumbag not only abused her, but took pictures and posted them to the internet.

    Now, 9 years later, those pictures are still available and whenever anyone is caught with them, the couple is notified and can seek restitution from the person who had them.

    The issue that comes up about this issue is regarding privacy. Only one provider actively tries to rid the internet of these photos/videos, and that is Facebook. The rest, like Amazon, claim privacy concerns. And, in fact, Facebook is likely to make this claim too.

    So, do the privacy concerns of Facebook and Amazon trump the rights of victims? Should internet providers who provide storage be required to scan all photos so that authorities can make requests of them for things like child pornography?

    How can we deal with issues like this so that there's some way for victims of such crimes to remove those photos from the internet?

    1. profile image0
      promisemposted 13 months agoin reply to this

      Great question, Crank. From everything I read, I think law enforcement is working harder than ever to stop child pornography.

      It won't end overnight. But the trend is moving in the right direction.

      1. crankalicious profile image95
        crankaliciousposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        I think this is a broader question than that. Do you support forcing these companies to find this stuff and violate these privacy agreements?

        1. profile image0
          promisemposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Absolutely.

          1. wilderness profile image95
            wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            I would disagree with this; if we wish private companies to be responsible for enforcing the law then we should be hiring them to do just that.  To require ANY company to be responsible, at their expense and effort, for enforcing the laws we make is not reasonable.

            1. Credence2 profile image79
              Credence2posted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Wilderness, how is that any different than a tavern keeper involved in keeping minors outside his or her place of business or not serving them alcohol?

            2. GA Anderson profile image91
              GA Andersonposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              uh oh, you might want to rethink that one. In the context of this discussion, I think your "enforce the law" is the same as follow the law.

              I think Credence2's comment completes my thought.

              GA

              1. wilderness profile image95
                wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                Seems to me it can only be "follow" if we decide that anything on FB's servers belongs to them.  The way it is set up that isn't true, so to require that they enforce the law as to what others post is not right.  Seems to me.

                I am also very much against censorship...which is in total opposition to my feelings on child porn.  Not sure how to resolve that, except to agree that some things need censored and hope that cracking the lid on the can doesn't simply remove the lid and pour out the contents.  Either way, though, it is not the job of FB, as it stands, to provide that censorship.  That job belongs to the government.

                1. GA Anderson profile image91
                  GA Andersonposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                  Oh Buggers! Now I have drawn us into the debate of whether they, (Facebook et al), are publishers, or a platform for publishers.

                  And even worse, to continue would hijack the thread into a discussion of the limits and responsibilities of censorship. Our thoughts are not dissimilar enough for me to go there.

                  Carry on.

                  GA

                  1. crankalicious profile image95
                    crankaliciousposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                    Technology can do a lot. Should we require these storage companies - Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft - to search their databases for child pornography and identify those who have it?

            3. profile image0
              promisemposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              So Good Morning America can show porno on TV to boost ratings?

              1. wilderness profile image95
                wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                One person's porno is another's art, setting aside the whole "child porno" thing.

                Given that, yes.  Good Morning American can show porno on TV...or would you rather throw the CEO in prison for showing a pic of Michelangelo's "David"?

                The whole "I cannot define it but I know it when I see it" is more than a little inadequate.  Even when used by a member of SCOTUS it is ridiculous as a useful part of law.

                (As an aside, I don't find your question to have anything at all to do with child pornography.)

        2. profile image0
          Hxprofposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Why not? Aren't companies (platforms) ultimately responsible for what they allow on their sites?  I understand that individuals are "publishing", but once child pornography is published, regardless of who did it, it's on YOUR platform, and arguably, regardless of the terms you have with those who're publishing, you (platform) are partly accountable.

    2. Stevennix2001 profile image87
      Stevennix2001posted 13 months agoin reply to this

      Well considering Amazon did allow the book "how to be a pedophile" to be sold on their site for awhile with no concerns whatsoever, I'm not surprised.     

      Honestly I'm not sure how to answer your question because even if sites like Amazon, Facebook and etc do all scan photos for the authorities to request on demand, it's not going to stop photos like that from leaking online.   Plus there are vpn services out there that can block a person's location from the authorities as well.   

      Plus even if they do take down the photo from the site, there's no guarantee those same photos won't pop up somewhere else as the internet is forever.    Even if you delete something on it, the thing you delete never truly goes away because people can screenshot conversations and whatnot even before you erase what you post or say so I'm not sure what to tell you.    I do feel bad for victims like that.

      Heck I have a friend of mine who was a victim as well whom I brought up in another comment thread awhile back so I can certainly understand how frustrating it can be when assholes get away with shit.

  2. Kyler J Falk profile image89
    Kyler J Falkposted 13 months ago

    I think the war on child pornography is a bit like the war on drugs. The more you try to fight it, the more you create a market for it. 

    Now, I'm definitely not saying normalize it by any standard so please don't misconstrue that last statement, but I am saying that companies such as Facebook and Amazon are required to relinquish any information they have depending on the laws of the area in which their servers are based. Often this leads to the arrest of individuals who used the platform for illegal doings, and the relinquishing of all information available to the site to the agency that requests it.

    So if the servers are in an area like, say, Serbia then the content stored on those servers are subject to the laws of Serbia.

    Therefor I don't think the issue should be about breaking a privacy policy that is legally bound by the laws of the land, the issue should be getting lawmakers to eliminate the loopholes that allow withholding evidence to be legal.

    Attacking or otherwise disparaging the companies who are simply using the law to their advantage, like any good business does, is counter-intuitive to combating child pornography and the criminals who concern themselves with it.

  3. Kyler J Falk profile image89
    Kyler J Falkposted 13 months ago

    I would also like to add that both of these companies have an automated process that works in conjunction with the algorithms of other companies, like Google, to auto-identify and disable the accounts of the perpetrator sending the files. Send a picture, that those algorithms recognize the exif data of, and say goodbye to your account access forever, though they will keep the content in case of proper legal action against you.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)