OAN, NewsMax, and Fox News Retract Their Voter Fraud Stories

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (16 posts)
  1. crankalicious profile image94
    crankaliciousposted 3 weeks ago

    Huh.

    I'm watching OAN, NewsMax, and Fox, and they're all running stories retracting their accusations that voter fraud occurred with voting machines. According to these stories, which ran on all three networks, these were just made up. None of the networks had any proof of their accusations about voting machines being created by Hugo Chavez, or being connected to George Soros, or changing votes.

    Weird.

    Why would they run stories about voter fraud like that if they knew they were false? Why would they run stories like that if they didn't have any proof the stories were true?

    And if the voter machine stories were true, why would they now run stories saying they are false?

    It's so confusing.

    1. PrettyPanther profile image84
      PrettyPantherposted 3 weeks agoin reply to this

      Wow, it's almost like they're not legitimate news organizations... .

      big_smile

      1. Ken Burgess profile image91
        Ken Burgessposted 3 weeks agoin reply to this

        ROTFLMFAO... that was a good one...

        Like there is such a thing in America today.

    2. Live to Learn profile image78
      Live to Learnposted 3 weeks agoin reply to this

      I have never heard any news story anywhere anytime claim Hugo Chavez created a voting machine. Please provide a source.

      1. crankalicious profile image94
        crankaliciousposted 3 weeks agoin reply to this
        1. Live to Learn profile image78
          Live to Learnposted 3 weeks agoin reply to this

          Nope. Please point me to the news reports from the outlets you claim are retracting their stories. The retraction, itself. Not another outlet claiming it has been done.

          I'm not the one who started the thread. I would assume you'd want to appear credible. Maybe not. You've been less than credible in your recent posts that could be construed as rants.

        2. GA Anderson profile image93
          GA Andersonposted 3 weeks agoin reply to this

          Hmm . . . Speaking of being able to use Google . . .

          Your original point was about news outlets running retractions for stories about Chavez creating manipulable voting machines, yet your first two links are of stories about a facebook user making a claim, (among many), that the Chavez family owns 28% of Smartmatic. And your third link primarily talks about vote switching—with a couple of sentences related to Chavez and Venezuela.

          A better Google search would have served you better with just one example—an actual Lou Dobbs interview segment with Sidney Powell

          GA

    3. GA Anderson profile image93
      GA Andersonposted 3 weeks agoin reply to this

      I feel obligated to comment because if this were a Liberal-biased comment I would probably jump in. So . . .

      First a couple of nit-picks. In looking at the "retraction" segments, and the stories about them that Google provided, I did not see anywhere that the networks admitted that the stories were not true, the 'clarification' clips I saw, (primarily Fox's segments), spoke to admitting that they had no proof that the stories were true—through presentations of contradicting narrative, not that they knew them to be false.

      So, in the spirit of accuracy,  the segments didn't actually "retract" anything. I would say it is fair to say they are backtracking—in high gear. They have been caught in their bias and are 'debunking' their own claims to save their legal butts.

      As they say; for full disclosure, I initially thought the fraud claims were serious enough to warrant checking them out. They sounded plausible, and the presented "experts" seemed credible—at first glance. However, after hours of following internal links and Google search results, I stopped short of digging myself into a hole I couldn't get out of. I didn't find credible support for the claims, or the experts. And said so.

      As for your question of why they would run stories like that . . . That was a rhetorical question, wasn't it?

      GA

  2. Valeant profile image83
    Valeantposted 3 weeks ago

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/maria-bar … -lou-dobbs

    Dobbs, Bartiromo and Pirro all ran the same segment to clear Smartmatic, since Smartmatic only had a small part in Los Angeles county and not in any of the swing states where voter fraud was 'claimed' to have taken place.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE6s7P6wThI


    Now, trying to offset Trump's narrative gives us one great example from Georgia's election committee chair, William T. Ligon, who based his stance that the election there was untrustworthy and that they should decertify the electoral vote by saying the following:

    'Among the findings is the probability that “fraudulent ballots” were “purposely placed” into the final vote totals by election workers at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta.'

    So Ligon thinks there's a probability, but cannot cite one specific example of actual fraud.

    'The events at the State Farm Arena are particularly disturbing because they demonstrated intent on the part of election workers to exclude the public from viewing the counting of ballots, an intentional disregard for the law. The number of votes that could have been counted in that length of time was sufficient to change the results of the presidential election and the senatorial contests.'

    Again, likely because poll watchers were kept at a far enough distance to keep vote counters safe, Ligon concludes that that gave election workers the opportunity to change votes. Not that he can prove that they actually DID, just that the opportunity existed.

    This is why the courts threw out all of these arguments. They are speculative as opposed to factual. They are hypothesizing that fraud could have occurred, not that they can prove that it did.

    Basing legal arguments on a 'probability that something could have taken place' or that 'votes could have been changed' is not actual evidence that fraud actually occurred. This is why the Trump legal team has lost 59-of-60 court cases, because they lack any factual cases to conclude widespread voter fraud.

  3. Abecedarian profile image80
    Abecedarianposted 3 weeks ago

    Newsmax owner is a big Trump supporter, watched him on CNN around the time of the election and Trump was aggravated with FOX. He said his viewership was up and he started picking up where FOX left off on far-right conspiracy's. This week, however, the owners of the Dominion Voting Machines threatened to file a lawsuit against all three aforementioned for libel.  They quickly changed their reporting.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)