Do you believe in America because of the proliferation of social programs, the lives of poor people is much easier which makes many lose incentive to improve themselves educationally & socioeconomically? In the past where there were little or no social programs, poor people look to themselves to create better circumstances. They looked to themselves for sustenance. They knew the meaning of working & making sacrifices if they wanted a livable or better lifestyle. Your thoughts?
That philosophy was a necessity when this country was raw and fertile. If I guy could get a little acreage, he could earn a decent living and perhaps put away enough to buy more acreage. Or he could see a need and fill it with a business: a general store, blacksmith, horse trading, jewelry making, you get the picture. But when we run out of raw materials, and the earth is starting to run low, sometimes there are no materials in which to spin the American dream. To make it worse, even if the factories return to this country and man (how about humanpower) is readily willing and available, robotics are taking a big plug out of opportunity. Factories that at one time employed hundreds of people can now be run by 15 or fewer humans who are there to keep the robots running.
That's why more and more people are turning to service industries, and now "they" are finding ways to mechanize those industries. What's a body to do? Think about it.
There is always a way based on my experience as an entrepreneur independent individual and other strong individuals . As far as the status quo American, i sense they are headed for ground zero by more abuse. Before the pendulum swings the other way.
You are right about one thing, CP. The pendulum does swing back and forth. I think that one of the goals of the New Age is go make it stop in the middle. The Christian Bible calls that "Heaven on Earth."
If you do not believe in the governmental support for the poor through social programs. Then you should also not support the money given to big farms, the pharmaceutical industry, tech companies, the car industry, banks. etc. Thousands of companies get money from the state, is this wrong too?
Many companies will go bust without governmental support. The price of your milk will triple if the government does not support the dairy industry.
Your food will be far more expensive if farms weren't subsidized by the government. So why not subsidize social programs, healthcare, schooling and art?
I think you answered your own question (although I am not in favor of subsidies) - if you subsidize the milk industry millions of people will have cheaper milk. If you bail out banks, millions of people benefit - the entire country if it would have led to a depression by NOT doing it.
If you subsidize simple living costs for a single individual that individual lives cheaper. Big difference.
I really don't see any difference, just the big shots getting breaks common people don't share.
Yes, banks on welfare....
Since when is subsidizing schools subsidizing an individual. Or Subsidizing a hospital, or subsidizing a theater.
So why can you get cheap milk and not cheap medicine or cheap schooling?
Subsidizing individuals = Tax breaks
Schools, no, at least as long as ALL schools are subsidized. A hospital - do people all over the country use that hospital that they paid for? Or just a local handful? Same for the theatre?
Give the cheap medicine to ALL, give the cheap milk to ALL and the schooling as well and you have...socialism. Or perhaps communism. You certainly don't have freedom as you must pay for what others want.
Yes, what's wrong with subsidizing all schools?
Are you okay with the subsidized car industry but not with a subsidized education system? And you give the argument that you don't want to pay for something you don't use yourself. Well, perhaps you will never use a Ford that is subsidized by the government with tax money, your money.
So with your logic, you are against any form of subsidizing. As you see it as communism. Well the US is highly subsidizing farmers, the tech industry, the car industry, and millions of other things. It's probably more communistic than Rusia in that sense.
If you truly want honest capitalism you should be against bailing out banks, against giving farmers money to keep the prices of your tomatoes cheap, against keeping the price of gasoline low etc.
Imagine what would happen if the government didn't ask for tax and didn't subsidize anybody.
An interesting thought experiment.
It would be true capitalism. and with a lot of poverty, I guess. A 4th world country. But maybe I'm wrong.
Nothing is wrong with subsidizing all schools...up through the 12th grade (in the US). There is no need to subsidize higher education (more than we already do) as we already have more college grads than we can use, and as too many use college as a play time rather than having to work.
Yes, the US subsidizes far more than it should. No argument there, for in general, if a company cannot make it without government providing their profit then they should not be in business. There are exceptions, but that is a good general rule. IMO.
No taxes means no military and no police. As protection is the primary reason for government, that cannot work. But do note that every single citizen (except, perhaps, the criminal element wishing to harm others) benefits. Not just a few, and not just specific people, but everyone.
So everybody should benefit from the spending of the tax money.
I agree on that one. But society is not a two-way system. It's more complicated than that.
In most cases, you (or I) benefit indirectly from something. Like schooling, I don't know how to fix a car, but my garage knows, they learned it. So if he/she was subsidized for learning to fix my car I will benefit indirectly from the subsidy (Tax money).
If we needed more car mechanics, perhaps it would make sense to subsidize the training of car mechanics.
But we don't, and it therefore is neither required nor wise to continue forcing people to pay for mechanic training. For the most part, that's exactly where out higher education resides; we have plenty of graduates, no need to pay for more.
Lower education, on the other hand, is required just to get along in this life and remain off the welfare rolls. And is therefore quite reasonable to purchase that. In addition, everyone in the country received that benefit; time to pass it along to others. College, on the other hand, was paid for by the recipient in years past, and there is no reason to ask those people to now pay for it again, for someone that wants it but doesn't want to pay for it.
+10000000000000. Not to digress(well I might as well digress), there are FAR TOO MANY people attending college- talking about C students who attend college. C students AREN'T college material. College should only be for the top ten percentile grade earners i.e. A to B students. C students shouldn't attend college.
I would disagree with this, for grades in high school are not a conclusive guide to grades in college. They can go either way for a wide variety of reasons, perhaps the biggest being maturing students.
I think you are correct, Wilderness, but I also agree to a certain extent with Grace. There are some students who really don't belong in college. They would do better in trade school. My boss and I had a discussion about this about 20 years ago when all the trade school were turning into junior colleges, and a person had to get an associates degree instead of a certificate in welding. A lot of students were dropping out of junior college because they were failing math and English but making As in such trades as HVAC, welding, plumbing, electrical, and even chef's school. Just before I retired, the powers-that-be were seeing the error of their ways and trying to reverse course. I think maybe a lot of student debt was going unpaid because these students as college dropouts couldn't find jobs in their trades.
But it doesn't mean that all C students should be denied college.
Absolutely not all kids should go to college! But the key word was "conclusive"; while high school grades do not give "conclusive" indication of success in college, there is a strong correlation between low grades and dropping out of college.
But that correlation is insufficient, IMO, to deny the "C" grade student the opportunity for further schooling. It may well be sufficient to deny scholarships, grants, or other financial aid, but not to simply deny them college.
Guys, I don't get your discussion on "what's wrong with subsidizing all schools." All schools means just what it says "all schools" not distinguishing between public and private schools. Public schools are just that paid for by the taxpayer dollar. Private schools should be paid for by their supporting organizations, for instances, churches, clubs, social organizations, etc. In my opinion those should never be subsidized by our tax dollars. If Mr. and Mrs. Gotrocks want to send their children to private schools, they should have to pay for it themselves, especially if it is a school owned by a religious organization. Taxpayers should never subsidize man's religion, but ultra conservatives are finding ways to legalize "vouchers" to leech their religion off onto the taxpayers. Is this what y'all are hinting at without actually saying it?
I will answer your question with several others to contemplate:
Based on history's examples, which propels mankind and it's achievements forward?
Is it Nationalism, Empire, Fascism ... or is it Socialism, Liberalism?
Did America become the great and powerful nation it did because it was kind and generous to others?
Or did America achieve its leading global position because it defeated all that opposed it, as it achieved its Manifest Destiny, and beyond?
Which type of society throughout history has propelled advancements forward?
The type of society that is fractured into hundreds of different beliefs, sexes, and tolerances?
Or those societies that have more rigid cast systems and unite, as best as possible, under one shared belief system?
When a Nation, Society, People, have been on the rise what does that look like?
And when a Nation, Society, People have been on the decline what has that looked like?
History is full of examples, general themes can be found throughout the ages.
And which do you prefer? What is the price that you are prepared to pay for your caste system empire? In the face of whate a caste system is, why should I go along with that?
Trump represented this aggressive American attitude for you, didn't he?
Trump was a delay to America's economic decline and the dollar's debasement and little more to me.
I understood the bigger picture of the decline which began in earnest under Clinton and carried on un-interrupted throughout the changing Administrations until Trump.
Trump reversed course or eliminated things like the TPP, Paris Accord Agreement, Compact on Migration, altered NAFTA, influenced decision making in various corporations which accounted for a temporary rise in jobs created (until the Pandemic was unleashed and used as a political weapon to shut down every state under Democratic control).
I have always put economics first, international affairs second, and everything else a distant third. When it comes to the President, this is what the EO controls more than anything. Other issues, other concerns are more the purview of Congress and the Courts, especially concerning those issues you put to the forefront.
You have always put issues I don't even put as Secondary. as your primary issues of concern, and that is why we never agree on these matters.
I see clearly that if the ship sinks, race doesn't matter, sex doesn't matter, when the country deteriorates all but the very well off will suffer.
Perhaps the fall has already begun, seen in constant riots in the country today, and the homeless which are taking over the streets in the populated states. The level of homelessness was unheard of in the 80s, 90s, 00s. And I can never recall a time when city blocks were taken over by rioters for weeks on end.
But for certain, the devaluation of the dollar, and the transition from being the world's reserve, will cripple the economy and impact society in ways not seen in this country since before WWII.
It is what it is... Trump was nothing more than a delay... his four years allowed me the breathing room I needed to set my family up in a much better situation, there are no guarantees, but my family is on much more solid ground economically than we would have been if Trump hadn't caused a four year delay in the Nation's economic decline.
It is a matter of priorities. Ken, times are changing. I just as soon see the whole boat sink as to remain forever a mere steward upon it.
Obviously our priorities differ....
Trump and the flinty Republicans did nothing but issue timeworn bromides about what he and they would do for the American worker.
Your family is not my family. I am relieved to see Trump go, and will give Joe Biden all the support I can.
Some kids learn in a way which is different than how teachers teach.
Some kids want to follow their own interests.
Some kids want to find their own motivations.
Some kids resist the system and they can't help it.
Some people are not kind.
Some people want to take advantage of others.
Some people like to bully those who don't or won't fit in.
Some people want to take advantage of those who do not know how to fight for themselves.
Some people are kind and want to help those who can't fight for themselves but deserve to be helped and fought for.
It's not complicated. We all come into the world with open hearts.
Each one of us can reach our own highest potential, if our hearts remain open.
Kindness holds the key.
Kindness is what we strive for, although sometimes our efforts are misdirected, overblown and inappropriate.
In general, however, I believe America cares, and that's why I believe in America.
by janesix 6 years ago
I think it is due to the erosion of families. Mothers no longer stay home with their young children, and fathers are no where to be seen in a large percentage of families. The kids don't have a father figure, and I think this leads to joining gangs, dropping out of school, and criminal behavior. Am...
by Ralph Schwartz 3 years ago
The President announced today that America will levy tariffs on steel and aluminum to the EU, Mexico, and Canada tonight - retaliatory measures are already being drafted against the country and the stock market is tenuous at best. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said trade talks with the...
by BlissfulWriter 9 years ago
If your restaurant bill turns out to be less than what is should be...would you tell your server of the mistake?
by Keishia Lee Louis 6 years ago
Why are social programs (i.e. welfare, universal health & college) so controversial in the USA?Do you think it has anything to do with our diverse ethnic, cultural and religious ideas? Or is it something else?
by Dan 9 years ago
Do Americans have a sense of entitlement?With welfare, unemployment, new public healthcare and other social programs being provided by the government, are Americans feeling a sense of entitlement? Do some Americans feel that they are owed something just for being born here?
by steve-bc-ca 3 years ago
I was involved in a forum discussing whether teachers should be held accountable for a students success. I started thinking about the possibilities of home schooling, but I don't have any information on the subject and I noticed there were no hubs on the topic. What do you know about it and what is...
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|