In Biden's first address to Congress, he certainly laid out a very aggressive, not to mention expensive agenda. From the New green deal to a huge infrastructure spending proposal. His speech weighed heavily on promises of all kinds of goodies.
The Democrat's work has just begun. At this point, the Democrats control both chambers of Congress and the White House. They have a lofty load of progressive legislation to offer up, which includes democracy reforms, universal health care, climate change legislation, and immigration reforms. However, there is one stumbling block that one might say is taller than Trump's golden wall... That would be the filibuster. To accomplish anything the Filibuster must be abolished.
As the Senate’s rules exist today, Republicans in the Senate will still have the power to block every single progressive priority that comes before them, by using the filibuster, which requires at a minimum 60 votes to advance legislation.
In my view the writing is on the wall --- none of the progressive issues that Democratic leaders are discussing today will become law if the Republicans use the filibuster protocol. Unless the Democrats make an attempt to change the rules and get rid of the filibuster.
The filibuster is a simple procedural mechanism that allows the minority party to block legislation from advancing in the Senate. The filibuster is the ability to keep debate open on a legislative item until the Senate votes to close it. Closing a debate requires 60 votes, instead of the usual 50, and if you don’t have 60 votes, you can’t move to final voting. The practical result – in an era when both sides are playing legislative hardball – is that you need to either get 60 votes or bypass the filibuster to accomplish anything.
For most of the Senate’s 230-year history, legislation was passed with simple majorities. Even after the filibuster was created in the early 1800s, its use was rare. That changed in the second half of the 20th century when the filibuster was increasingly used by both parties to block legislation. Both parties have used the filibuster to cause gridlock, it has clearly become a weapon to a greater extent than ever before in order to kill pieces of legislation. An important thing to remember is that the filibuster is not required by the Constitution.
The filibuster has been amended repeatedly, today it is actually much weaker than the original filibuster. Over the course of the last 100 or so years, the filibuster has been repeatedly weakened to avoid total gridlock and dysfunction. In 1917, the Senate instituted a means for officially cutting off debate through a supermajority vote. Before this, there was no means of stopping a filibuster at all. With this change, cutting off debate now required two-thirds of all senators.
In 1974, the Senate eliminated the filibuster for budget bills meeting certain requirements (a legislative process called “reconciliation”).
In 1975, the Senate lowered the thresholds for ending a filibuster to 60 Senators.
In 2013, the Senate eliminated the filibuster entirely for federal executive branch appointees and judicial appointments, other than the Supreme Court.
In 2017, the Senate eliminated the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
At this point, the Democrats are considering doing away with the filibuster. Eliminating the filibuster is actually simple. All it takes to eliminate the filibuster is a simple majority vote in the Senate — and this can be done at any time. Mitch McConnell, can then initiates a filibuster. Democrats can then hold a vote, and with just 50 votes eliminate the filibuster and prevent McConnell from vetoing the legislation.
Will the Democrats deal with risk-averse in regard to getting rid of the filibuster? One might keep in mind some members of Congress often take the path of status quo, that in some incidents serve their political careers better to keep status quo rather than take bold action.
Do you feel the Democrats will do away with the filibuster?
If so, without the filibuster safeguard protocol how will it affect Governing in general?
Will doing away with the filibuster severely change America's Democracy?
Hey, anyone concerned about all the earmarks (pork) being added to Joe's Infrastructure bill? It's astronomical!
Makes me wonder what we would do without the filibuster at this point to stop this kind of legislature. Not sure when Americans are going to wake up and realize at this point we are printing money to pay for all this BS. And that this kind of spending will ultimately, and quickly devalue our dollar. Inflation has already poked up its ugly head in gas prices, and consumer goods of all kinds. And Biden has only been in office a couple of months. Inflation is not sneaking up, it's stampeding.
Any thoughts on Joe's infrastructure bill, and the obvious need for the filibuster to stop this kind of fluffy pork rine spending?
If the Democrats have their way, America will be bankrupt because of their inane policies. I sincerely hope that McConnell DOES INITIATE A FILIBUSTER. The Democrats need to be contained like wild rabid dogs. The Democrats are OUT OF CONTROL.
by Sharlee 22 months ago
The GOP Held Strong Using The First Filibuster To Stop The Democrats Cold In Their Tracks May 28, 2021 --- "Senate Republicans on Friday halted an effort to form a bipartisan Jan. 6 commission to investigate the Capitol attack, marking the first successful legislative filibuster...
by Credence2 2 years ago
Yes, it is a Salon article, but it reflects my opinion 100 percent. At this juncture, the Republicans and the Right are to get NOTHING. No peace in our time.https://www.salon.com/2021/01/22/mcconn … ull-swing/1. Barack Obama had hardly taken his oath of office on January 20th 2009, before...
by Sharlee 14 months ago
Biden’s promise to update Voting Rights Act hits Senate roadblockPresident Joe Biden's campaign promise to update the Voting Rights Act has hit a roadblock in the Senate today, threatening a key campaign promise made by Biden about civil rights.Biden's live statement to press --- ...
by JOC 17 months ago
Democrats have the votes to raise the debt ceiling with a straight up and down vote. The GOP chose to filibuster the ability to raise it. This is not about future spending, this is about paying for the debts already incurred, including the $7.8 trillion added while they had control of...
by Scott Belford 5 years ago
My thought is No, they should go ahead and filibuster Judge Gorsuch now and not wait. The fear of filibustering now is that the Rs might use the "Nuclear Option" - using a simple majority to change Senate rules to eliminate filibustering for Supreme Court nominees; just as Democrats...
by Readmikenow 3 years ago
I don't get Democrats. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez presented legislation to be considered by the US Senate. It was called the Green New Deal. Many Democrats came out in support of this legislation in the press. The leader of the Senate put it up for a vote. Democrats are...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|