The Great Cover-Up: How Biden’s Confusion Was Hidden in Plain Sight

1. 83

   Sharlee01posted 15 hours ago

   
   
   Throughout Joe Biden’s presidency, many Americans felt that a broad coalition, including political allies, mainstream media outlets, and insiders within government, worked together to protect him and hide his confused state. Rather than directly acknowledging his visible lapses, hesitation, or verbal missteps, these groups often brushed them aside as harmless gaffes, moments taken out of context, or exaggerated attacks from his opponents. The reality, however, was that this protective shield was carefully crafted. For party leaders, Biden was the face of stability after a period of turbulence, and maintaining that image was essential for holding power. For the media, downplaying legitimate concerns about his sharpness often aligned with a broader goal of supporting narratives favorable to their side. Even within the White House, there was evidence of calculated management: fewer unscripted press conferences, pre-selected questions, and tightly controlled public appearances.
   
   The reasons behind this protective effort were clear. Acknowledging Biden’s decline would have undermined confidence in his leadership, risked weakening Democratic unity, and opened the door for political opponents to seize on vulnerabilities. For the press, admitting the obvious could have meant exposing years of biased coverage and a lack of scrutiny. For insiders, it was about preserving influence, ensuring policies advanced without disruption, and avoiding a destabilizing power struggle within their ranks.
   
   What stands out now, even after Biden’s cognitive struggles have been broadly exposed to the public, is that some continue to defend him. These defenders insist on minimizing the issue, suggesting that his confusion is exaggerated or irrelevant, even though the evidence has been impossible to ignore. Their persistence underscores the deep partisanship of our political climate, where loyalty to party and agenda often outweighs honesty with the American people.
   
   In the end, this opinion piece argues that Biden was shielded not out of compassion but out of political necessity. Yet the long-term cost of this strategy is serious: a loss of transparency, erosion of trust in both media and political leadership, and a lingering sense among citizens that they were not given the full truth about their president’s condition.

   replyreport