Is there really a "war" against drugs?
Is the "war" against drugs a front?
The alledged "war" against drugs keeps people employed on both sides. It's a trillion dollar a year business.
If the "war" against drugs were ended, what would be the effect on our national economy?
Good question. I wrote a hub about it."Americas-war-on-drugs-is-war-on-its-own-people" A different angle but I will be interested to hear others opinions. Good topic I reckon.
I'm gonna read that "hub."
Have you read my latest one?
I'm gonna twist yer arm...lol
Loved the one I read. It was about you and ultra-light planes. Is that the one? I left a comment, I really enjoyed the story and particularly your writing style. Neat!
Yep..that's the one.
I still fly the danged things.
I don't own one but my Bud in Arizona does. I get out there a couple times a year and every time I get to 3000 ft, I still piss my pants....lol
I didn't hurt yer arm when I twisted it did I..lolol
Thanks for readin' it..
I read your Drug "hub" left a comment...
I ran back to that "hub" to read yer comment..it ain't there?
Are ya sure ya haven't been rollin' bible page joints?...and imbibing? hmmmm?...:-)
It musta been that last one, it was a purple dutch head!
Seriously I dunno where it went! Fixed now I think.
Yes, there is a "War on Drugs". Still being fought.
It was a double-barrel shotgun is what is was. Government needed money, so it declared War on something, it made the funds available, because the people bought into it.
The obvious truth of the matter, in today's society in America, that "War" was futile. It may have stemmed some, but nothing compared to what was being brought in. And, you're right it's a heavy business with a lot of "cash" assets.
The National Economy? Includes too many variables.
'Is there really a "war" against drugs?'
Yes, there is, but it's a losing battle, and a waste of time, treasure, and lives.
'Is the "war" against drugs a front?'
If you mean, "is it a distraction from other, more important issues?" then, yes.
'The alledged "war" against drugs keeps people employed on both sides. It's a trillion dollar a year business.'
True. If we decriminalized (not even legalized, you understand, but decriminalized) most of the drugs, we could save billions. We could lower taxes or spend those monies on, oh, education or something.
'If the "war" against drugs were ended, what would be the effect on our national economy?'
Well, that would depend on what we, as a country, decided to do with the money were spending on the war on drugs. We could lower taxes, and increase the overall prosperity of the people. We could redirect the spending toward infrastructure, or education, or some other service, and increase the overall prosperity of the people. Or we could look for some other victimless crime to declare war on, and keep wasting money.
hi qwark It is indeed so hard to tell if there is a war on drugs, a war for drugs or a war the media has created
Whatever the case the drugs are much further ahead in winning the war on whomever its with in my feeling.
Great thread , nice to see you
My father worked for the Federal Aviation Administration and he once told me it was policy that for every 5 suspicious aircraft flying at minimum altitiude crossing the United States border that only 1 to 2 were reported. His suspicion was payoffs.
I had a friend in Ft Lauderdale Fla...he owned Fla. Atlantic Airlines....He WAS a billionaire.
He leased cargo planes to S American drug cartels back in the early 80's.
I asked how much he was worth while playin' pool with him. He made a shot, didn't even glance up and said: Shit! I don't know. I don't count it...lol
He was brought down later by the Mexican drug cartel...for good.
Power in money man!
The governments war on drugs has been a multi-million dollar waste of time and obviously money..Ask the mother of an inner-city child if the drug war is being won. They are living on the front lines of the real war...it's between rival gangs killing one another for a street corner and a few more dollars.
I liked the bit in Super Freakonomics on how the terrorists turned Marijuana in to California's biggest cash crop. After 9/11 border control tightened up, the drugs stopped getting through so easily, and the farmers in the US made a killing.
Although it seems like the war on drugs is a lost cause and I agree that it will never end, you would actually be amazed if you only knew the quantities of drugs that are seized at our borders daily. Sure, much more is probably getting in, but it's not a free-for-all.
...as I said before: money talks, BS walks.
As long as the drug war continues, people prosper.
Are you saying that I'm BSing? I guess I'm just feeling like those that are fighting this war should get some credit, too!
I agree with you, and many a people are prospering!
I recently finished reading "A Target Rich Environment" which was written by a recently retired drug agent who worked on the California/Tijuana border. Although fiction, it was based on true facts and cases and was very interesting!
I think the War On Drugs is a total waste of time, money and it ruins many peoples lives in the process.
If marijuana alone was legalized and those incarcerated for it were let loose it would saves billions alone every year. Instead of spending billions fighting it, billions could be earned in taxes. We would not be paying for all of these people in jails and prisons.
Do you realize that over half of those behind bars are for minor marijuana charges? Marijuana is too easy to grow and because of this it will never be stopped. It is a pointless war that can never be won.
But it can and does damage many lives each and every day that it continues. Go to prison for marijuana then get out and try and get a job, good luck with that if you now have a felony on your record. The government pretty much just sentenced you to a life of crime because thats all you will be able to do most likely. What problem was solved here? Seems to me like only new ones were created.
Sure there is a 'war' on drugs. It's just being fought in the wrong way. I wonder how serious this 'war' is supposed to be.
This "drug war" is just as ineffective as a previous generation's war against alcohol was. The drug war has come to symbolize the need of certain people in this nation to impose their will on others and is based on a very poor view of people in general. The argument for drug interdiction is that people can't help but become addicted to these substances. Since people can't help themselves, government must take upon themselves the burden of protecting people from themselves.
I have to wonder about the validity of the first assumption. Drugs are not the only addiction people suffer from. Gambling, alcohol, even sex can all be addiction that people suffer from. Yet we don't see bans against that sort of behavior. Why not? It is true that there are addictive personalities and that they can't seem to help themselves. Many drug users are also smokers, drinkers and gamblers. It's the personality and the choices the person makes which determines their susceptibility to addiction.
Another assumption is that by incarcerating drug addicts we somehow fix the problem. The only problem we fix is their loitering on the streets looking for a fix. Instead of trying to help them, we put them in a sort of "school for criminals" by incarcerating them. Not only do they not get help, they learn to be criminals. It's no great surprise that many identity theft rings have been made up of meth heads in the past.
Finally, there is the assumption that prohibition by authority works. Like it or not, there is a demand for this stuff in this country. Because there is a demand, prohibition will not work. If we want to lessen demand, we're going to have to find reasonable ways to decrease demand, not "feel good" "quick fix" legislation that doesn't work.
by consciencealert 8 years ago
By being pro drug war you-impose heavy cost on the population to protect people from their own choices-help create a great incentive for government to take away more of our civil liberties. Agreeing government should be violently involved in peoples personal habits. -advocate using lethal force to...
by vincentfrank 8 years ago
I just read an article about Javler Sicilia a Mexican poet.His son was found dead killed by a Cartel hit team.Since 2006 38,000 people have lost there lives in this war that we support.And by support I mean all the Americans that buy drugs from the Cartels.We need to take start figthing back this...
by Wesman Todd Shaw 7 years ago
Are you ready to end the drug war yet?Prohibition didn't work the first time....unless empowering a black market was the actual goal.It is beyond clear to all but the most pig headed that prohibition hasn't worked the second go round either. Most all of these drugs existed long before drug...
by Josak 7 years ago
With millions jailed and killed in the drug war with no decrease in drug use or distribution it is beyond time we start legalizing and treating rather than punishing and jailing. Portugal has instituted such a system and has had amazingly successful results, it's time we stop funding the Mexican...
by Deforest 5 years ago
US – Russia relations have deteriorated severely in the past decade and they are about to get worse, if the House passes H. Res. 758.NATO encirclement, the US-backed coup in Ukraine, an attempt to use an agreement with the European Union to bring NATO into Ukraine at the Russian border, a US...
by CrazyGata 6 years ago
Some say "war on crime is really war on poor people". What do you think of this statement?There is argument about crime as a result of areas neglected or segregated by the government. Is it true that lack of education has to do or is it a matter of manning up?
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|