a perspective on the reading of the healthcare bill that uses military language to create a corp of military doctors...???
another overlooked and undebated portion of the bill
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3941417/?pla … t_id=87284
I agree with Judge Napolitano on his assessment that there is no need for this section of the law because there is already a pool of health care providers to pull from and that the Fed has no authority to call personnel from the National Guard unless we are at war.
I think the military language skews the (supposed) intended purpose of having a pool of health care providers at the ready to handle Domestic national emergencies such as 9/11 and Katrina. But still, there is no need for it since every state and every hospital has a disaster plan in place. Language for better funding to train in those scenarios would have been better.
You're right, there is no need for it. Since we've established that...why do you think it's there?
Well I just did a search for 'ready reserve corps' in the Reconciliation Act and there is no language for it so it was probably in the original House version. Maybe people should do a little investigating instead of relying on outdated Youtube videos. The date on the page has today's date but the Judge in the video refers to the 2700 page bill and we now know that the bill that passed was 2400 pages and the "fixes" brought it down to 2300.
Why would it be in the original bill? probably because some over zealous Congressman's aide wanted to impress his/her boss and contribute something to the beast.
by Madame X8 years ago
Bill 3400, which is a viable alternative to the current Bill, has been introduced in Congress and is now in committee. But guess what? Pelosi and her band of fascists have changed the rules in Congress. A bill may no...
by ptosis3 months ago
https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_ … rs_cfm.cfmAbove link is for you to contact your Senators.Here is an unbelievable fact: the bill will give $33 billion over 10 years to the richest 400 Americans -- an...
by Silver Rose8 years ago
I don't normally get involved in political debates, but had to wade into this one. Some foolish American magazine has made the following comment:"The controlling of medical costs in countries such as Britain...
by SparklingJewel7 years ago
I truly want to know if these are valid reasons...or are they perspective on what "could" happen, or just totally absurd possibilities. If you have proof to validate or deny these reasonings, I genuinely would...
by GA Anderson2 years ago
MIT professor Jonathan Gruber, a paid technical consultant, (claims have been made he was paid $400,000.00 for his work on the Obamacare bill), and a major architect of the Affordable Care Act is recorded at a...
by Sab Oh7 years ago
...for Obama to shut up, I'd imagine. He was on the tube today demanding reconciliation and essentially pushing a health reform bill that the public doesn't want down that public's throat. I imagine a lot of dems are...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.