Bill 3400, which is a viable alternative to the current Bill, has been introduced in Congress and is now in committee. But guess what? Pelosi and her band of fascists have changed the rules in Congress. A bill may no longer be introduced for a vote unless SHE says so. So this alternative Bill is forced to stay in Committee, even though so many are shouting for an alternative.
Check it out for yourself-
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=108440
A graduate student is expected to read something like that in a night, .
Just sayin' Bye-bye, now. You 'conservatives' have fun today!
I absolutely agree; a graduate student IS expected to read something like that in a night...and plagiarize it.
LOL! You forgot to add 'and come to any conclusion that flatters the ego of some self-important unwashed associate professor only a year or two distant at most from being exactly the kind of brainwashed little zombie parrot as that grad student is.'
Sounds like someone's bitter. Did you guys get rejected or something? Or, you must have both been through top-level grad schools to say something like this?
(I'll wait for my one-line response to an out-of-context quote in which you try to make yourself seem clever, not to mention to stay on the top of the poster list without actually contributing arguments).
Just a true troll...replete with thousands of tiny, tiny little posts. But we are glad they keep you away from college campuses.
Who else could I speak for? And, continuing to speak for myself, I freely admit loving the Army definition of college degrees as explained to us in Basic Training during the Viet Nam Era:
B.S......self explanatory.
M.S......more of the same.
PhD......piled higher and deeper.
Life...and all things therein...is what you make it. I freely admit to that growing up poor the daughter of a truck driver and factory worker--working 3 or more jobs to put myself through college.
*edit: But I understand that was supposed to be cute, Ghost. Just, not everybody has the same truth, as I'm sure you know.
Understood. My mother was an English teacher with a Master's from a time when women seldom did that; my Dad was her high school student (9 years younger) who never made it past tenth grade but who served in WW II (Navy) and worked his tail off ranching for many years while losing money hand over fist.
Anyone who can handle 3 jobs (presume you mean simultaneous jobs) while attending college has my nod of respect. I worked, but never could handle 40 hour work weeks with a full class schedule or I found myself sleeping through 8:00 a.m. English classes. Had to limit it to no more than 24-30 hours of wage earning per week.
Those english classes you were missing were teaching 'irony,' which is what that last message was full of. Vietnam happened because we didn't understand the conflict we got into. Maybe if more people had studied a little, they might have been more cautious (general David Petraeus, who turned around the Iraq war, has a PhD). I have the utmost respect for our armed forces, past and present, but I hate -- and frankly don't understand -- the notion that being more educated somehow makes someone less intelligent.
It's also indicative of the conservative form of government. . . you know . . . supports the rights of the individual, keeps taxes down, and can actually be read by the average citizen . . .
what a concept
Well, ya know what they say about generic or general language in documents... But then again, maybe not.
If you can't make the link work (it worked when I tried it) go to www.wnd.com and paste into the search box
Shhhh! There's GOP alternative to Obamacare
to see the article
As opposed to 1,000 page bill nobody understands? Come on, Lita, you're better than that. You know just as well as I how people can take a huge document like a home loan, for instance, and write it in such a way that the person signing the loan doesn't understand everything in it. Why is it when a bank does that, it's immoral, but when people like Pelosi do it, it's somehow OK. Just a bit inconsistent don't you think?
But the opposite of that is true, too. Of course, I'd imagine you know that, as well. ?
Something can be written in such a generic and undecided way that loopholes can be found and the language can be exploited. Newspapers are said to be written at an 8th grade level. However, realistically, how many high school level educated adults read even them?
Something as comprehensive as a new health care plan/bill takes a lot of consideration and construction and is not authored by one person. Where I work, to allow for ease of comprehension of plans, we come up with an EXECUTIVE SUMMARY explaining the document in general. However, the details are still important, as well. And I'd ask--does anybody really read a manual from cover to cover? No. But every part is necessary and valuable, I'd warrant at certain times to certain people in certain situations.
Another point is--sorry to burst your bubbles of plebeianism--it is a simple fact that some people are better at verbal analysis than other people. And no, sorry, folks, that isn't "elitism," but good old using one's skills in the job market. That is why we have people who are good at such things draft legislation. That's why I get to read through all the plans and proformas and come up with language to market with and for public consumption.
OF course some take advantage, I'm sure, with excessive verbiage...in all arenas. Job description/agreements, for example, where the employer wants to protect their butt, and where you end up signing up to do ANYTHING (haha, short of prostitution) that the employer decides you should do if they so decide. Actually...I believe most people are aware of that one. And, sigh, health insurance, where obviously, they are dealing with profit motive, and were often not very healthy people are bombarded with mailing after mailing about claims, and the process is so confusing you often times don't know where you stand. ...I think many people are aware of that one, too.
I believe your posts to be motivated by (as you all have stated over and over) a deep distrust of anything to do with government, and also the usual generalizing about "liberals" and "conservative"--which gets so boring. So, what I'm saying, is yeah, LDT, I am better than that...but you'd prefer it wouldn't be so, , haha.
I'm sure this alternative bill, also, despite being 63 pages long (!), what a selling point, also has a Republican (or whatever they are calling themselves these days--debate is still out on that one) agenda. ..woopie. More of the same...it just works so well!
Like, you know. You use your skills as a troll on the internet, TK. Only you don't make $$ at it. X 3156 short little posts in 4 months and counting!
You know me, I'm totally opposed to any sort of government sponsored healthcare. Since we're not given much of a choice but to accept "healthcare reform" I'd rather argue a smaller bill than a larger one.
That was too silly even for you, TK.
It's well known (and emphasized) that newspaper copy is to be written at an 8th grade level. For easy reading.
And I could care less what you read or think. You, too, I'd imagine. Or you wouldn't waste your time with your, at most, 2 sentence posts.
Lita I think it was you who left the link to the whole document. From memory it was 1008 pages.
I have finished reading it, and the legalese is very confusing to me still, as I have little knowledge of legalese.
I think it is humane and decent in the main, but the touted cost is astronomical! :
Apparently you are. What's your opinion of the alternative Bill?
If they can write It , they should read It ! After all that Is their job !
That's the sad part - they didn't write it. Oh they may have contributed a little, but I think it was mostly constructed by the "czar(s)"
Well then that answers the question as to why they haven't read it. why should they, whats the point? The czars have had their say in it, period. And yes it is very very sad, for all of us.
Actually the primary portion of the bill and its major points was composed by the Apollo group a progressive lobbist organization. And the base document was written before the election and sitting on a self waiting for a progressive President to push it through. Most of this "legislation has been planned and written by the left for years just waiting its opportunity.
Now that our resident troll is done commenting, not on the topic at hand, which is an extremely important one considering the outrage over healthcare, but on the length of the Bill, I'd just like to point out that once you remove the death panels, the confiscatory clauses that let the IRS take your bank account or wages to pay for someone else's healthcare (probably an illegal alien), the part about the federal database that holds all your medical info, the part where some federal bureaucrat gets to decide whether or not you should get a certain procedure, and the part about how much doctors will get paid - you really don't need any more than 63 pages.
By the way, has anyone followed the link? And if you have, does ANYONE have an opinion on it?
Isn't having a greedy businessman deciding whether or not you get expensive treatments or not worse than having a government beaurocrat? I read the article, at least it is an intelligent argument, which I wish more conservatives would make, but I just disagree with the notion that the markets will even everything out, because it's not happening. It hasn't been happening since Reagan brought it upon us. The poor are left high and dry in America and everybody else is too selfish to care.
You can post the bilge you do...replete with conspiracy theories so heated that NOBODY should take you seriously...EVER, and call a reasonable post like mine 'trolling?'
I know you don't like writing so much, given the fact you've published so little...even though this is a writing site. And, what with that prized 63 pages and all (YOUR prize and your point, not mine), but you could convince your detractors YOU are not a troll, 'Madame,' by actual posting something of relevance.
Still convinced TK and I are a team designed to disrupt your very important posts? And how about those death panels?
I can see why you go on and on about those OTHER people who are just so darn divisive...
Hold on, only a 'professional' writer could make level such a charge. You know, someone who - gasp - reads the newspaper (oooooo).
I tried following the link, but my inordinately slow satellite Internet took forever in the attempt, and I gave up for now. Maybe if I stay offline for a couple of days....
Even without reading the plan, however, I do have a preconceived opinion (no surprise, right?), which is: I'd rather see no plan whatsoever than see us go deeper into debt...and I somewhat doubt even a conservative "reform" effort can avoid that entirely.
P.S. My abhorrence of debt could possibly stem from having "gone under" personally, to the tune of having filed bankruptcy...twice...in this lifetime already.
Sorry to Interrupt the pissing contest . But anything that Pelosi does surprises me like not at all . If the liberals of the Hill keep up this type of behavior all they do Is Insure a rapid changing of the guard . These guys are sinking like a stone only faster !!!
True unless that is, they change it all. I mean what is to stop their way of pelosi (oops I mean policy lol) changes to affect our very own democratic process in elections and or terms of office.
What I mean by that is, I sit and watch as our government grows bigger and bigger and "bullies" the rest of us. They impose this and that with little to no regard as to what the people really want or need.
They trample all over the constitution and some, including our own president have stated that is basically useless. So whats to stop them from throwing it out? They already have really. Leaving the "We the People" out in the cold.
So we will all have to wait and see what happens in the next election and besides even if the "conspiracy theory" I just mentioned does not actually happen by then, whats to stop them from "fixing" the election results to get who they want in their anyway. How do we know for sure that didn't alreaady happen?
Time will tell I guess and history as well.
During Obama's speech to congress on healthcare did anyone notice the republicans waving sheets of paper when Obama spoke of bi-partisan effort? They were waving copies of Bill 3400, an alternative to Bill 3200 that is locked in committee.
So much for a "team effort"
I really wish we could get these ***ho*es to work together. Most of this is really tit for tat. When the republicans were the dominant party they made life hard for the democrats and now the democrats are paying back the republicans in kind.
If we all call and write our congressional leaders and the white house and make enough noise they will listen. Never heard of this guy but it's great.
I'm afraid to come into this forum, Lita and Tk are arguing about her "Goodly" writing and someone thinks we should have people with doctorates fight our wars! I wonder what the Phd's think of it?
Sometimes too much education is as much use as ... ...well, you know the rest.
by Readmikenow 2 weeks ago
This report proves there was no insurrection on January 6. If someone wanted to have an insurrection, why would they order 10,000 troops to help with crowd control? The report proves that President Donald Trump ordered 10,000 troops for January 6 and it was the democrats who decided not...
by SparklingJewel 14 years ago
Blogger Alan Caruba summarizes what is going on and warns us that this struggle is about so much more than so-called "health care reform"... it's a battle for the soul and the future of this great nation:"The bribery and thuggish pressures and threats against Democrat Senators and...
by Scott Belford 9 years ago
47 conservative Republican Senators signed a letter to Iran intended to undercut Presidential foreign policy. This breaks over 200 years of precedent, and probably violates the separation of Powers part of the Constitution. Should Americans, after puking over their blatantly unAmerican...
by Randy Godwin 5 years ago
After the reporting about Mike Pence also being involved in strong arming the Ukrainian govt--along with his boss of course--this puts the Speaker of the House in direct line to being the first female POTUS in American history. Ironically, the people who hate her the most have made this possible by...
by fishskinfreak2008 14 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_care_overhaulWhen was the last time A POLITICIAN kept a promise?
by Sharlee 3 years ago
Build Back Better -- Hold on Joe“No SALT, no deal,” Suozzi, a House Ways and Means Committee member, said Tuesday. The committee, which writes tax policy, will have large sway over the crafting of the $3.5 trillion infrastructure bill.“No SALT, no deal. I stand by my call that I will not support...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |