Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100516/ap_ … pvaW5zYXI-
OK this bill MIGHT have SOME supporters, but Sarah Palin is a lunatic with NO credibility and NO political future. Palin wants to prove that she is American by keeping foreigners out and that's it.
I wonder how you can say that especially after seeing the performance of Holder and Napolitano, neither of which read the bill. I wouldn't be surprised if no one including Obama read the AZ bill and I'd be willing to bet Palin did. I'd have to say on this issue Palin possess more credibility than the administration and perhaps even more than you. Have you read the bill?
You're willing to bet Palin can read? I'll take that bet.
I'm sure you'd lose, after all, she does keep notes on her hand, so what would you like to wager?
The AZ immigration Law is 10 pages long ,check it out on foxnews.com/yourworld The public is being fed all kinds of inaccuracies by the press, President OBAMA, Union activists, and other Radical groups. Attorney General Holder made all kinds of comments when the AZ SB1070 was signed into law. Guess what ! Erick holder admitted before a government judicial committee on 5/13/10 that he did not read the bill ( 10 pages ) as yet.I guess that's the way our elected officials do it in Washington, they read all the propaganda that the free press puts out to help them make decisions..
As head of the Justice Department, Holder has over 100,000 employees working for him. I suspect that if he did't read teh bill personally someone with expertise in that area of law DID read it and do the research to brief Holder.
Ewall you would say go to foxnews to check it out but the law is being use to racially profile. There's no way a white person is going to be asked for his papers it will only be latinos who may be citizens but because of reasonable suspicion they will be targeted.
Okay sarah palin is a joke why does she not get interviewed by someone like rachel maddow since she made a comment about her recently.Does she not want to be thought of as a nominee for president even though she only is in the business of inciting dangerous rhetoric.
Scuse me, but didn't she and her family used to go across the border to Canada for healthcare treatment??
USA USA USA
Oh my God.
Can you Leant leftists just stop obsessing over Palin and AZ.
And now you have combined your neurosis.
I see meds in someone's future.
Sarah Palin is the most informed politician of the current herd. She reads "all" of the magazines currently in publication according to her interview with Katie Couric. I assume that includes "High Times" and "Sheep Shaggers Monthly".
wait...there's a Sheep Shaggers Mag? (looks around furiously)
You get a free subscription to Sheep Shaggers Magazine when you buy a copy of 'Going Rogue' by Sarah Palins Ghostwriter.
It isn't a good shearing those sheep fear around the lefties I have seen.
Baaa everyone away from the cliffs baa baa hee's coming baa baa... tuck your knees......baa baaa baack off ahhh ahhh ahhha" lololol
Sorry, folks. But Sarah Palin has more guts than anybody else on this board. She ran for public office in a small town and rose to governor. She doesn't dodge a fight. And her knowledge on national and foreign affairs is equal to Obama's -- our resident community-organizer-in-chief.
Palin wouldn't make a good President. In fact, we haven't had a real governing President since JFK. But Palin is a force in politics. Hopefully she can rally a brain dead American public to stop this socialistic drama.
She's so popular, in Wichita, Kansas, she spoke in the 14,000 seat arena, and as conservative as those people are, they couldn't give the tickets away. only 2,000 showed up to listen to the whack job.
she's a hazard, and has no clue about foriegn affairs, and lies on top of that. It scares me she's coming back to Az.
When Sarah Palin made her famous 'death panel' statement about the health care bill - she was factually wrong in every clause. The statement was designed to terrorize seniors about the intent and effect of the bill. She'a a despicable liar.
That panel exists in the HC Law, actually. If you had read it you would know that.
It is a creation of Cass Sunstien. It will weigh the economic cost of your life continuance, against the productive quality potential. It is nothing new. England has a Dept that specailizes in determining who and what gets done for what and who.
Not so far fetched Doug.
"The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's "death panel" so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their "level of productivity in society," whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil." 
The accuracy of Palin's comment was disputed by every impartial fact-checking organization who researched Section 1233 of HR 3200, the House version of health care reform. In a huge bill, Palin finds fault with the one section that allows payment to Medicare doctors for voluntary end-of-life counselling. Let me explain 'voluntary' - nothing in the bill requires the doctor to offer the consultation - and nothing requires the patient accept if the consultation is offered. Section 1233 lists topics that must be included the discussion in order to qualify for payment, including the living will and advance directives.
Sarah Palin's facebook claim (Aug 12) in defense of her original claim does not dispute:
1) There are no 'death panels'.
2) Her child with Down Syndrome wouldn't be affected.
(until 2074 when he qualifies for Medicare)
3) There are no 'bureaucrats' anywhere in Section 1233 -
only a doctor and patient in consultation.
4) There's no subjective judgement of anybody's
'level of production in society'.
Read SP's defense of the original infamous 'death panel' quote and you can see not a single phrase of the original statement can be defended. In true wingnut style she defends what she said by changing the original accusation completely - because all factcheck orgs found the original claim completely false! A lot of seniors are still convince the government wants to kill them.
Read it yourself -
Thanks Doug for posting your comments.
I'm still waiting for TMMason to cite the particular section of the bill where death panels are specifically outlined.
Seeing how it doesn't exist, it seems I will be waiting for the rest of eternity.
Palin has a nice set......of teeth. She should be doing toothpaste commercials.
Jon Ewall is the voice of logic and reason.
So many people are bashing this Arizona Law when all it does is put enforcement into the existing laws. They are uneducated and know nothing about it.
Why would any true American Citizen be against protecting our country?
On one hand you have people all riled up over Muslims and Osama Bin Laden (Who Dan Rather can interview, but the collective intelligence of the United States Military can not seem to locate). They scream 911 and support the untold Billions thrown at the "War" in the name of 911.
Then when posed with the simple reality that 15-20 Million people walked right into the country and are living here illegally they shout racism when the people of the State of Arizona try to enforce existing laws.
Makes no sense at all. If 15-20 Million people can walk right across the boarder and set up shop illegally you think it makes sense to spend Billions each month "Protecting" us from the "Bad Guys". What a joke.
If you can't secure the boarders you can't stop terrorism. It's just that simple.
Illegal is NOT a race.
And to anyone who does not want to secure our borders, then it's ridiculous to support a War against anyone.
The left doesn't support the wars either bro...
Too bad our elected officials in DC choose not to read the bill. Maybe the length is just too much. I mean at 10 pages that is quite a bit of reading for such busy people. It just makes me wonder, how on earth did they get the time to read the Health Care Bill that was 2409 pages?
On no. They read the bill! The problem is they can't admit that they read the bill, because then they wouldn't be able to attack it. You see, after reading the bill they realized there is nothing in it that is unconstitutional. The problem then is how can you attack a law that is legal and right and written in response to the failure of the feds to enforce existing law?
They can't so they claim they haven't read it so that they can continue to attack it, and they have plausible deniability.
Summary of Federal Immigration and Nationality Act Section 8 USC 1324
"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.
Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.
TAKE NOTE WHO IS MAKING THE MOST NOISE ABOUT THE AZ LAW. LABOR, AFL-CIO,TEACHERS,SEIU ,LA RAZA AND OTHER RADICAL GROUPS INCLUDING ELECTED OFFICIALS OF OUR GOVERNMENT.
HUBBERS TAKE NOTE OF MEXICAN LAW
If you break the Mexican illegal immigrant law. First offense 2years in jail Second offense 10 years in jail I would venture to say that there are not many with 10 year terms.
In the US,ICE if they don't release the illegals they send the illegals back to the border ( many try getting back in often )
THE ARIZONA LAW BS 1070 TAKES EFFECT ON JULY 29TH As President Obama said '' Adios Amigos ''
At least 9 members of the Obama administration who have made comment of Arizona Immigration Law SB 1070 admitted that they did not read the law.I guess not reading the law is the norm for President Obama and Congress.
by TheSituation 8 years ago
What do you all think about this one? Seems like some good fodder for my fellow hubbers.
by Stacie L 6 years ago
Supreme Court upholds key part of Arizona immigration law, strikes down restBy Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News | The Ticket The Supreme Court upheld a key part of Arizona's tough anti-illegal immigration law in a 5-3 decision on Monday that allows police officers to ask about immigration status during...
by LBMod 8 years ago
The tragedy this past week in Arizona has drummed up all sorts of emotions and fears in the American public as well it should. What happened to the victims of that heinous act of senseless violence is horrifying, some might say unacceptable. And while I’m sure we can all agree that it was...
by Flightkeeper 8 years ago
Should other states follow Arizona's immigration law?The illegals don't return home, they just go to another state and start over again and incur expenses at their new state.
by Deforest 4 years ago
Then, why did Obama (the executive) made a new law by changing what the constitution stipulated anteriorly? Isn't the US becoming an absolute monarchy?
by ptosis 6 years ago
It has been said that "Immigration is a federal issue and we can't have 50 states making 50 laws." but we have 50 different rules for voting for the president which is also a federal issue.I'm not asking if you are for or against SB1070. I'm asking if states' right of self governing...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|