Newly Released 9/11 video

1. 55

   Shinkickerposted 13 years ago

   Three Firemen discuss what happened to them
   
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o

   replyreport
   1. 69

      bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      The failure of the following meeting to gain a pipeline for Halliburton gave Cheney motive for 911. Also, Cheney was a member of PNAC and in 2000 they said they needed a new Pearl Harbor to establish US presence in the middle east. Cold Blooded Murderer Cheney had both motive and knowledge of 911. 
      
      
      From the article:
      
      A senior delegation from the Taleban movement in Afghanistan is in the United States for talks with an international energy company that wants to construct a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan.
      
      A spokesman for the company, Unocal, said the Taleban were expected to spend several days at the company's headquarters in Sugarland, Texas.
      
      Unocal says it has agreements both with Turkmenistan to sell its gas and with Pakistan to buy it.
      
      and:
      
      In May, Taleban-controlled radio in Kabul said a visiting delegation from an Argentinian company had announced that pipeline construction would start "soon".
      
      The radio has reported several visits to Kabul by Unocal and Bridas company officials over the past few months.
      
      A BBC regional correspondent says the proposal to build a pipeline across Afghanistan is part of an international scramble to profit from developing the rich energy resources of the Caspian Sea.     
      
      Here is the link to the article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/west_asia/37021.stm

      replyreport
      1. 64

         Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Ah, Sugarland, home of the little bug killer, Tom DeLay!

         replyreport
   2. 69

      bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      BTW Shin, there was a gag order for years on this fireman testimony. I am surprised that the guilt of the NIST allowed for this release. This makes Cheney guilty of murder and Bush as well. Look at this Bush OJ type guilty meltdown:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeoeGb47olU

      replyreport
      1. 64

         Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         I'm no fan of Bush and Cheney, but your suggestion that either or both of them had anything to do with 9-11 is B.S.

         replyreport
         1. 69

            bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Wrong Ralph. Did you look at the videos? In Shin's video there were explosions. You are aware that Marvin Bush, youngest brother of George Bush, was in charge of security up until the day of 911. On 911, his successor, on his first day on the job, died.
            
            Marvin Bush had control of the cameras. There were explosives in the building Ralph. Watch the video. You have to watch the video or you don't get it.
            
            Motive came from what I submitted above. Again, no major American media reported this visit of the Taliban to Texas.

            replyreport
            1. 64

               Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

               Yes, I watched the video and didn't observa anything suspicious. Explosions could have been caused by natural gas leaks resulting from the plane hitting the building or other reasons. I may be naive but I believe the published reports on the causes of the tragedy, to wit, a coordinated attack planned by al Qaida and executed by it's agents.
               
               Marvin Bush's security company which had a contract to provide security for the WTC could not have prevented the planes crashing into the towers and their collapse. If memory serves the FBI ignored it's own agents' eports about Arabs taking flight training but showing little interest in learning to land.

               replyreport
               1. 69

                  bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  NO Ralph, squibbs were observed coming out way below the devastation. These were timed. Squibbs can only be caused by explosive charges. There are videos with the squibbs clearly visible. You also have seen the implosions in Las Vegas. Here is a side by side of WTC7, not struck by a plane and a Las Vegas type explosion. Sorry, Ralph, our government is evil.
                  
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo

                  replyreport
               2. 69

                  bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  And Ralph, why would there be a gas explosion below all the action? It makes no sense. Marvin Bush planted the explosives. I don't care about his role about the planes. That is irrelevant.
                  
                  Also, don't forget all the evidence of Cali versus Enron was in WTC7. Funny isn't it?

                  replyreport
                  1. 64

                     Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                     The unofficial theories of 9-11 don't interest me. I don't feel compelled to refute other people's wild theories. I'm not a fan of the Bush family but I can't bring myself to believe the theory you are propounding. When a huge building has been hit by an airliner full of jet fuel all kinds of things can happen. I'm satisfied with the government's explanation. (Not happy about the FBI's dropping the ball.)

                     replyreport
                     1. 69

                        bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                        You aren't looking at the facts looking you in the face Ralph?
                        
                        If you are satisfied with the government's explanation of WTC7 that side by side video is a lie.

                        replyreport
                        1. 69

                           bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                           Come on Ralph, what is your answer to the side by side video?? Don't walk away now.
                           
                           And Obama was part of the coverup after the Iranian guy spilled the beans. The only issue I have with the Iranian president is that from my above post the primary movers of 911 were the oil men, not Israel.

                           replyreport
                           1. 69

                              bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                              Ralph, you aren't interested in a side by side video between a building laced with explosives and wtc7 collapsing which looks IDENTICAL?
                              
                              If you can't refute the side by side you have to accept that 911 was a conspiracy. You have no other choice.

                              replyreport
                              1. 64

                                 Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                                 Yes, I do.

                                 replyreport
                                 1. 64

                                    Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                                    What's more, I believe Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK without any prompting by the CIA or LBJ. And I don't believe a 100 mpg car has been suppressed by the oil and car companies.

                                    replyreport
                                    1. 69

                                       bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                                       So you refute the side by side then.
                                       
                                       That is irrational but if it makes you happy....

                                       report
   3. 87

      rebekahELLEposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      sad. I don't think we, the public will ever know the truth about 9-11. they release what they want us to believe.
      
      did you see the smoking gun video? talking about WTC7?
      there's also a site about WTC 7 controversy. http://www.wtc7.net/index.html
      I don't really get into it much, but I have listened to and read various articles. there was also a PBS special about it.

      replyreport
      1. 69

         bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Here is an easy explanation of WTC7 Rebekah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo
         
         A video is worth ten thousand words.

         replyreport
         1. 87

            rebekahELLEposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            it's interesting also the tenants that were in WTC7.. many financial institutions along with secret service and cia.

            replyreport
            1. 69

               bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

               True, but they left and the evidence of Enron/Cali was destroyed. Ken Lay was Bush's number one private sector friend and financier.

               replyreport
2. 60

   Petra Vlahposted 13 years ago

   There is a very good hub by Micky Dee about this subject; all we need to know to understand what happened and WHY is in there

   replyreport
3. 62

   Daniel Carterposted 13 years ago

   There is little incontrovertible evidence in most conspiracy theory.
   
   The same mentality seems to apply among religionists all pressing their own views.
   
   Where's the HARD evidence? The stuff that would stand up in a court room?

   replyreport
   1. 69

      bgamallposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Where is the hard evidence that ponzi lenders planned liar loans to steal from mainstreet? Just enough circumstantial evidence to burn a wet mule Daniel. Same here. There is enough circumstantial evidence and I would say the side by side is empirical proof.
      
      Here is another circumstance, Daniel. Warren Buffet had a party on 911 at Strategic Command of all places. One of his guests watched as her entire company was destroyed in a tower. She was spared. Well, wonder why? It so happens that her director became head investigator for 911. How convenient isn't it?
      
      These people were gods, but not the Almighty, which they will one day learn the hard way.
      
      And Buffet's Netjet followed flight 93, no military aircraft. Berkshire mentioned it once and refuses to talk about it again. I wish this were my website but it isn't: http://killtown.911review.org/buffett.html

      replyreport