1. Danie Van Gilder profile image37
    Danie Van Gilderposted 7 years ago

    if have an gov. run public schools, and housing, why not a public work force, to run like a family, but by instructors that had learned how to do it good.

           parents have failed, so have like russia, orphanages to raise up the younger kids.

       they with their freinds, a feeling of belonging and assuracnce and saftey and reward, so that, just a  continuous schooling, who doesn't need help to grow up?

           esp. save the poor from their plight concerning this, so save the slum blacks, hispanics and asians?  let the extremely rich go and while we wsavet the pooor by OUR gov. programs.

    1. Ralph Deeds profile image65
      Ralph Deedsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      As I posted in another thread, JFK said "A government that doesn't help the poor won't be able to protect the rich." Or words to that effect.

  2. VENUGOPAL SIVAGNA profile image58
    VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 7 years ago

    "Let the rich to, save the poor"

    I dont understant the real intention of this thread.
    Should we save the poor and their poverty?
    Should we drive out the rich and take their property?

    Why should it not be like this? :
    Let the rich help the poor. 
    Let the poor get rid of their poverty.
    Let the poor becom rich.
    Let every human being become rich.

    No one should save the poor and their poverty. They can only be helped to become rich. No one should order the rich to go. They can only be made to help the poor and eradicate poverty.