“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opposes lifting the moratorium on drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and on the Outer Continental Shelf. She won’t even allow it to come to a vote. With $4 gas having massively shifted public opinion in favor of domestic production, she wants to protect her Democratic members from having to cast an anti-drilling election-year vote.
Moreover, given the public mood, she might even lose. This cannot be permitted. Why? Because as she explained to Politico: ‘I’m trying to save the planet; I’m trying to save the planet.’ A lovely sentiment... There are a dizzying number of economic and national security arguments for drilling at home: a $700 billion oil balance-of-payment deficit, a gas tax (equivalent) levied on the paychecks of American workers and poured into the treasuries of enemy and terror-supporting regimes, growing dependence on unstable states of the Persian Gulf and Caspian basin.
Pelosi and the Democrats stand athwart shouting: We don’t care. We come to save the planet! They seem blissfully unaware that the argument for their drill-there-not-here policy collapses on its own environmental terms.” —Charles Krauthammer
Drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge will only supply us with 3% of our oil needs and it will take 10 years for oil production to reach that capacity. 20% of our oil comes from the Middle East. We can easily cut 20% of our oil usage with conservation. All it takes is a little effort on the part of every American.
Anyone who thinks drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge is a good idea has never lived up north.
It's a quick fix that will screw up this planet more than people realize.
The arctic is a fragile ecosystem that has a HUGE impact on the rest of the world and our weather systems.
Why is it that no-one ever thinks of the long term impact of these things on our standard of living?
It's all short term thinking. "Oil is expensive, we are fighting wars over it, so lets drill in Alaska instead!"
The Arctic and Antarctic need to be protected for our future. Just ask scientists why they are so worried about it.
Is this the same 'Charles Krauthammer' who was a signature signer to PNAC, a 'Project for a New American Century', the plan for American domination of the world for the 21st Century, that has bankrupted the US, and has embroiled the US in endless war?
'don'tknow...tell me...show me the research'
I'm on hubpages but I tend to write more articles on my blog and the discussion of oil comes up a lot. Not sure if it'll be helpful but let me know. Thanks!
Here's a thought - The US has spent, what? $650 billion on the Iraqi war?
I wonder if that money had been put into placing solar panels and wind turbines out in the desert - where there is not much other than sunshine and wind lol - how much renewable energy that would have created?
That would be intellegent. Against the law in America. The ruling class and the corporations have a history of destroying things
like public transportation, trains, public energy for the sake of private profit, oil, cars and tires.
by MikeNV 8 years ago
When are people going to stop putting up with the Pork attached to every bill that goes to Congress?The Democratic Party wants to extend unemployment once again. Okay. The way things are going those out of Work are the new Welfare class and will probably be out of work for years. ...
by emrldphx 7 years ago
1 - In what way is oil and drilling destroying our planet?2 - What should we do about it?3 - How should we power our cars?4 - Should we drill to help our economy while we work on other ideas or no?
by kerryg 7 years ago
Contrary to what has been suggested in several posts here over the last few weeks, Obama's supposed imposition of "regulation after regulation, roadblock after roadblock" is not what's holding up domestic oil drilling, it's the oil companies themselves holding out for higher profits.This...
by londonguy1 8 years ago
WHAT CAN IN OUR OWN WAY SAVE THE PLANET ???????????????????
by CMHypno 8 years ago
Obama's attacks on BP are increasingly being viewed in the UK as signs of his anti-British stance. Or is he just trying to pull attention away from his own administration's failures?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … itain.html
by Don W 8 years ago
Would a free market have prevented this from happening?I'm guessing the libertarian argument would be that the failings of state regulation was a contributing factor. Those failings stemming from the fact that the regulators were in bed (figuratively and literally) with those regulated. Whereas...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|