Too early to say what will happen, but even under the umbrella of the GCC, (Gulf Cooperative Council), 'peace-keepers' from Saudi won't be welcome on the streets of Bahrain.
well it is match between iran and sauid played in bahrain..this was expected event...let us see what happens...
Yes and no. It's being emphasised that this is GCC, and by invitation. UAE has also sent 500 police into Bahrain. But Iran is inevitably making political capital out of it and styling it as an invasion, while the protesters themselves are calling it an occupation. time will tell.
As an aside, every Thursday night, thousands of Saudis pour across the causeway into Bahrain where there is easy access to bars with alcohol and bar girls, both of which are banned in Saudi. But they don't come in troop transporters, just Landcruisers!
It's turning really ugly today. Tanks, tear gas, a few deaths and several injuries. Medical services denied to injured protesters.
I guess this should be expected with such a vast wealth gap as the status quo ?
I see in Egypt the 'revolution' appears to be in the process of being sold out as the US 'backs' a General to take over so that the pro-Amrican stance is contued. Any news on that where you are ?
The wealth gap or perhaps even more the opportunity gap triggers the protest. But when that is coupled with a sectarian divide (sunni/shia) between rich ruling minority and the disadvantaged majority, it's a bad formula.
Sectarianism and tribalism are maybe the commonest excuses for barbarism. The protesters in Bahrain initially wanted political reform but were not unduly hostile to the monarchy. But this last is changing fast thanks to the disproportionate response.
Ruling elites seem to specialise in "disproportionate" responses. Saw some of this on our news this evening, and it is worrying. Especially appreciated the irony of Iran Deploring the "disproportionate" response - like they don't do similar things to anti-government protesters!
Eventually the voice of the people will be heard - the question is how expensive with the ruling elites - Sunni or Shia in these cases - make it?
Sectarianism is always bad news. Imagine a world without religion!
Could this develop into open conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran? That would be really bad news.
The Saudi/Iran escalation is what everyone in the region dreads. It could engulf and/or marginalise all those states caught in between, like UAE, Oman and Qatar.
There is something fundamentally flawed in the psyche of any person or group that wants to rule by force.
So, you're backing the Muslim Brotherhood?
Everything I'm hearing in the media from the locals says "we don't want foreign help".
So... US! Stay out!
http://blogs.aljazeera.net/live/middle- … -crackdown
This is being updated regularly. It doesn't make happy reading.
This is really sad news Dave. Moneyed class vs. the poor with a tinge of ethnic divide/conflict.
Sadly. more than a tinge, Maita. Rather like the Catholic/Protestant divide in Ireland, it can be stirred up into real hatred by people with agendas. That is the trouble with irrational beliefs the world over. Simply because the belief is irrational, there is no way to defend it under duress, except through violence.
Thanks for the informed comments and the aljazeera link. You should be reporting for the BBC or PBS.
Here's another "worrying development":
UK, France, US line up for air strikes against Gaddafi:
At least it would be UN sponsored with some Arab support. But the trouble with air strikes is that they rarely achieve much without a ground offensive in their wake.
(p.s. as for reporting for BBC - they had 22 years of technical support from me, and now I'm doing something similar for Jazeera, but I'll leave the writing to the writers
My understanding is that the UN Security Council resolution authorized what ever is necessary to protect the rebel citizens. That presumably includes action on the ground.
Apparently as a result of the UN action, Khadaffi called a cease fire this morning.
"Libya's foreign minister announced an immediate cease-fire Friday, less than a day after the U.N. Security Council adopted a resolution authorizing "all necessary measures" to protect the Libyan people.
"Foreign Minister Musa Kusa said his country is committed to accepting the terms of the U.N. resolution, a reversal from the initial defiance displayed by Moammar Gadhafi's regime."
He may well be trying to wrong-foot the UN by announcing this cease fire while simultaneously planning his next move. One thing is certain - he has not forgiven the protesters and if he remains in power he will take terrible revenge when he can, directly or indirectly.
And that proved to be the truth.
So Libya is now an out and out war zone. Yemen carried out a massacre of protesters yesterday, and Bahrain is occupied by Saudi troops.
This last is ironic. Notionally 'peace-keepers', they were invited in by the rulers, the very ones who had destroyed the peace by assassinating peaceful protesters. The GCC made a very wrong call there.
The only good news from the Middle East is that Egypt's referendum on political reforms had a huge and enthusiastic turn-out.
Between the Middle East, Japan's tragedy and the uncertain world economic outlook the situation looks pretty bleak from here (Michigan USA).
the news is very bleak lately...
The Japanese people will have to rethink their nuclear power alternatives and perhaps not rebuild the destroyed cities..
when are we getting out of the middle east or will this latest involvement get us into a third war?
I'm wondering who will be in charge when Gadaffi is removed?
will this reduce the gas prices?
by Dave McClure 8 years ago
Small beer compared with Egypt maybe, but the protests in Bahrain have to be taken seriously. For the most part, the protesters don't want to topple the monarchy, but they do want an elected majority government under a constitutional monarchy and an end to the suppression of human rights. This is...
by Readmikenow 5 days ago
This speaks volumes about the Democrat party.“Consideration and a vote on House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s resolution was blocked because Democrats advanced the previous question, by a vote of 226-191. The resolution would have condemned the Government of Iran for killing 1,500 Iranian...
by Credence2 3 years ago
I thought that this article, attached, was most revealing. It might just show that this problem is not just a figment of left's imagination. A politically conservative Black man from a politically Conservative state, South Carolina, explains the points that I have trying to make for some...
by Dr Billy Kidd 7 years ago
From several exchanges, I learned why some people are voting for Romney. It is because Romney will launch a war against Iran. Generally, it is said that Muslims will attack the U.S. again. And that Iran will use nukes, maybe suitcase bombs. Muslim, socialist Obama won't stop it from happening.Now,...
by callonresources 8 years ago
What do you think the future holds for Bahrain? now that there is a tough clamp on political dissent...what will be the role of Iran? will they stand aside and let their Shia brethren antagonised and sidelined? and will the west keep silent about attorcities in Bahrain? Will Bahrain end up as the...
by LAURENS WRIGHT 5 years ago
Do you feel that a conflict between Iran and Israel will bring about a 3rd World War?Do you think that USA, China and Russia would be involved?Do you feel that the USA would be able to achieve a military status to battle more than one large country at one time?Are there any bunkers ready for the...
Copyright © 2020 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|