President Flip Flop, as a senator, opposed the "dumb war" against dictator Saddam Hussein but supports "kinetic military action" against dictator Kadaffy. Unfortunately for him, it's not going so well because the rebels are an undisciplined rag tag bunch without a plan. Now, he has been thinking of arming the rebels but he hasn't ruled out not arming the rebels.
Just like he said that he's going to close Guantanamo but hasn't closed Guantanamo.
If we thought Kerry was a flip flopper, Obama is a human seesaw. But no matter, he won't have to make the decisions, he'll just give that responsibility to Hillary, Nancy or Harry, aka The Three Stooges.
"the rebels are an undisciplined rag tag bunch without a plan."
Who just happen to have Gaddafi on the run, he's rapidly losing support at the moment.
We are already discussing where he will be exiled to.
Is that what your BBC is telling you? Boy are you in for a surprise.
Why does it disagree with that fount of wisdom and honesty, Fox News?
Oh dear, can't let go of Fox News can you? Read this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ma … ch-gaddafi
Since it's british, I'm sure you'll have no trouble reading it.
I'm so amused that you're linking to the UK's most left-wing newspaper.
What can I say, I try to give information the way leftists can understand it.
You realize the BBC is one of the most respected news sources in the world?
Yeah, and a lot of people use toilet paper too.
I didn't say most used, I said most respected. There is a reason the BBC has a strong international reputation while Fox is a laughing stock.
Uh no! Kadaffy is not on the run and those rebels some of the fought against America in Iraq! We have no business helping them!
iraq would be opposed by any sensible person...bush ruined usa with his over zeal of iraq...china and iran benefitted from it...bush can be said to have in directly helped iraq and china but guess bush was never known for intellect and having vision....
Libya is different story...it has united nations support , arab world support...if bush could have learnt from obama a bit , usa would have been in much better position than what it is right now...it is sad that obama came after bush...but in other terms it was god plan to send some one like obama after disaster called bush
You must be listening to the BBC too. Bush got a coalition, in fact Bush's coalition was much larger than Obama's. As for the UN, so what? Is the UN leading the military? No. In fact, the UN is supposed to promote peace but is unable to do do so without the military might of developed nations. The Arab League doesn't know what it wants except they want to kill Israel; everything else is always an argument with them. As for God, if that's the same god that Reverend Wright uses to damn the USA, I'm not sure that it's going to be helpful for good ole President Flip Flop.
get real...usa would need more consensus than ever before...usa is no more leading power it used to be (thanks to bush)...china is soon evolving as superpower and it would have far more say that usa in future...
on iraq read about kofi adnan's general secretary of united nations at that time...he said bush's war was illegal and when he says that, chapter ends...usa and uk went alone and entire world criticized it...bush was one arrogant man who took usa down and blowed off republicans ...obama is much consensus man and so genuinely respected world wide...and personally i dont believe in god but if god is real , obama would surely be his man
Yeah, so genuinely respected that he got turned down by the Chinese!
So genuinely respected that the Brits and the French didn't bother consulting with Flip Flop over Libya; he came late in the game.
As for Kofi, umm, did he do anything more to stop the massacres in Rwanda? Ummm...NO!
nope...he was in the loop since day 1 in libya...yes usa has lost its clout because of bush and china won't respect usa , since china knows that bush has ruined it and now usa is dependent on china...so ofcourse and it is not about what kofi adnan did...honestly united nations can't do much in any case..usa was super power before it attacked iraq , un couldnot do anything against super power...yes bush did make it as second most powerful country by being in power for 8 years and now usa is where it is...i think usa needs 8 terms of people like obama to come back to where it was...another bush and usa would slip further down...it is scary to think about that...
In the loop? Yeah, so in the loop that he decided to go sightseeing in Brazil and Chile instead.
and still remained in loop...isn't it great...he remained in brazil, played back seat and operated without causing back lash which usually bush caused around the globe...wonderful efficiency...good job...
Funny, you didn't give Bush the credit that while he was conducting two wars, he cut taxes, conducted bilateral trade agreements with several countries and kept unemployment under 8%.
Obama is not responsible for the Wall Street crash that has given rise to unemployment, and it is utterly unfair to imply he is.
And with Bush, people are being so utterly fair.
yup...bush has got biased treatment just because he happened to be president of usa...had he been prime minister of Britain , he risked of being behind the bar for iraq...
Well then, since Flip Flop is president of the USA, any criticism of him is fair.
i could have given credit to him , if he wont have attacked Iraq ...afghan was justified...iraq was not...it cannot be justified ...
Not to you, but it has been approved by our Legislative body almost unanimously.
Too bad you can't say the same thing about President Flip Flop and Libya.
still does not get justified...it is principally wrong and the thing which is principally wrong still stands wrong and it is good that world too considers it wrong ...it did damage usa's image internationally but obama did restore it and i am glad that he played save in libya and went with consensus...good for america and very mature show by obama....
How odd that what you think is principally wrong under Bush is not principally wrong under President Flip Flop. As for USAs image, the Arab world already hates the US and uses it to excuse all their problems. They'll come to hate President Flip Flop even worse.
flightkeeper, these people are delusional socialist! It truly does not matter what we prove to them they make up some nonsense, you show them even British news and they refute! the last election showed how real Americans feel and blew the doors of the socialist. even the president admitted that! they like our president bowing and apologizing to everyone for America being great and powerful. funny how everyone needs our help when they are in trouble.
I agree with you. The only reason that they like President Flip Flop is that he's willing to take all the crap and not defend us.
the US is not the leading power????? boy are you delusional. if it was not for Americas force quadaffi would have killed them all already! Hillary was quitting last week because of Obama's wavering while on vacation again. the french and Brits could not even defeat Libya with out us. they have enough for 2 weeks of attacks.
i guess you think leading power only in terms of military...well war needs money + military might + international political support (lobbying)...
usa is huge military might and none can match it...there is no element of doubt in it...but military might can win the war but cannot serve the purpose...afghan ,iraq,vietnam are examples of that...usa won the war but with heavy loss of men ,money and reputation (especially in afghan)...
coming to leading power , well i think you are living in good old days...g2 is going to be reality soon...china would get veto power in IMF soon...even sarah palin said china has notes and we are dependent on them...china is rising military , economic and political power...it has 40 countries right now where it has influence and usa/europe clout is declining...obviously usa has been super power since years and decline would be gradual...it would take another ten years ...so still there is time ...usa has always be great visionary , innovative and welcomes change...world is changing and old ways wont work...top brass of usa politics knows that and am glad they are thinking in right direction....
By the way I am not socialist...i dont belief in socialist or communist concepts...i think it is not natural ...same which i think about conservatives...only thing natural is change
I will agree with you on most of your reply. We still are the top dog, yes we can lose it and then we all know it is truly over for this country. It can be less then 10 years if we do not fix it now. Glad you are not a socialist, Most socialist really think they are doing good. It has never worked and will never work. that is why I Dislike Obama for the reason, He is a Liar(stupid) and his policies. I just do not understand how all socialist cry racism if you do not like Obama? and he is half white so what does that mean? is it 1/2 racism?
The US and UK most certainly did NOT "go it alone," and let's not forget that 'ol Koffi's son was profiting greatly and illegally from black market oil deals with saddam after the first Gulf War. A little, tiny conflict of interest? Hmm?
Perhaps Obama took lessons from Romney.
Flip flopping is a specialty of his, as well.
Politics has a special way of inbreeding like that, from what I can see—variations on a theme.
I'm not much of a fan of either of these ego-maniacs.
Obama to take lessons from Romney? Don't think so. More like Obama and Romney took lessons from Kerry. I doubt Obama wants to learn much from a Republican although I do hear that he likes to position himself as Reagan from time to time.
Well now, Kerry, yes.
"Special needs" and an ego.
Amazing what a little marketing and gullible media can manage...
Obama rather thinks himself a Lincoln dressed as a Reagan, methinks.
Egos are an amazing thing. Probably good there's not much truth in them.
Surely...Oh no....Surely....we can't go and throw out an evil dictator who has massed countless humanitarian violations? That would make us...big meanies...in a "dumb war"!
I guess the other political spammer is going to take a break for a while as this one takes over ? or are they the same person I wonder?
Who are you calling political spammer...the minute I rarely show up on political forum, recommend 1 ?
Just cause someone doesn't state the view you want to hear...don't make 'em a spammer...ya' poor lil' panda!
(and then start alter-ego BS, too...Plez...we been down that road before...Been there-done that.)
Isn't it strange that if we go to war with Iraq all the world will hate us.
If we go to war with Libya then the world will love us.
I like liberal logic.
Logic, Jim? I think you give it far too much credit using the words: Liberal...and Logic together. It is like the polar or universal opposite of "Logic"...but now the Liberal President says it is OK to dispose an evil dictator in a Middle East Country. Now its' Ok...?????
Whoops...sorry about all the troops I created a bad-atmosphere for before. Whoops...my bad. Today it is OK to go after evil dictators in the Middle East. New Change-New Policy. Whoops, let's just forget about all the ol' stuff, OK?
Mere words can not describe the total opposite of logic that this now is!
@ts there is difference between criticism and propaganda ...huge difference...
@flightkeeper
Flightkeeperposted 41 seconds ago in reply to this
How odd that what you think is principally wrong under Bush is not principally wrong under President Flip Flop. As for USAs image, the Arab world already hates the US and uses it to excuse all their problems. They'll come to hate President Flip Flop even worse.
____________________________________________________________
not odd...iraq was done on basis of lie that it has wmd..in his summons blair admitted that they had got it wrong and there was no wmd...
libya was done after it saw protest on streets...it was call for world body and world body decided to implement no fly zone...
one was war which could have been avoided and another was decision whether to support libya people or not...
Yeah, keep justifying it to yourself, then President Flip Flop won't look so bad.
i guess you are justifying something which majority of human beings in the world believes was wrong...it doesnot matter what minority of bush supporters believe...in end verdict is loud and clear ...bush was wrong and that is what would go down in history...coming to your definition of flip flop , well if you see from point of view of situation it is not flip flop ,iraq was dumb war and libya has world support...difference is loud and clear for all to see...but you can keep bashing obama and justifying war of bush , if that makes you feel good
...
Yes, history will decide, Bush will be looked on more kindly and without the libtard hysteria. I have no problem with that and people will see that President Flip Flop was one of if not the worst president in all all time so far.
...i wonder how can man who is responsible for 0.1 million death can be looked upto kindly?...but let history decide is fair thing to say...in end it is mere my opinion and mere your opinion...doesnot count much for historians
Oh dear, been reading the BBC again have you? Let's see Hussein has been killing hundreds of thousands of his people, attacked other countries, but only Bush is responsible for the deaths. I hope you're not employed as a mathematician.
I agree, it really doesn't matter, it's only your opinion in the end.
...what one person does in his own country is none of usa's business....did iraqi called american , if yes well americans should have gone and attacked but that was not the case...why poke nose in other's business and if one person kills 20 that doesnot justify another person killing 10...it is totally absurd statement to make...
Oh, you say it's absurd but you don't see that when Obama does it.
i think you didnt read entire thing...did iraqi called for usa's intervision no...did united nations which represents 200 countries backed it no...do you see what bush did?...
did united nations called for intervening in libya ...Yes...did un backed it yes...do you get it or you dont want to get it ?
If you cannot see your own break in logic in what you just said. I can't help you.
and so can't I as in your case of comparing libya and iraq..both are not comparable to start with..
...i dont think how it is logical to enter iraq even when it was uncalled for and un didnt back it and how can any one compare libya and iraq at first place...one has uprising other didnt...one had international body calling for action , other didnt...infact it had international body opposing it...and killing 0.1 million people in the process for sake of war ???..
No. There was no break in logic there. The US legislative body authorized the war in Iraq, they didn't when it came to Libya. The UN has nothing to do with us. If anything President Flip Flop should be impeached for that kinetic military action. But that's okay, you're not the first who refuses to understand that.
ok...your logic is backed by us legislative body...i get it ,my stand is based on united nations ...so what obama did was wrong according to you because it was not backed by us legislative body ..fair enough...he is first usa president and then global leader....
now coming to bush , usa is part of united nations , it can't ignore un's calls...if it does , russia or china would do ignore which usa wont like it...bush violated international ethos by going in war with iraq ...that is what i am saying...
Of course the US can ignore the UNs calls. It's the UN who has to pay attention to the US, it was created by the US and funded mostly by the US. As for international ethos? Huh? The UN is one of the most corrupt organizations in the entire planet. Those who are appointed as UN ambassadors from third world countries live high on the hog at the expense of the poor of their country. Have you forgotten that officials from the UN who were supposed to protect people have raped the women that they were supposed to protect? And where was the UN in all the other atrocities that have occurred around the world? As far as I'm concerned the UN is pretty selective as to what it supports. It was the UN who allowed Libya to head the human right division - laughable! The US doesn't have to give a crap about the UN. And Russia and China and even France have ignored the UN whenever it wanted.
If it were me I'd pull my country out, kick that organization out of NY and let it sit in Libya. It's a useless organization.
If that country poses a risk to our National security or our allies then we are justified with taking action.
Bush built a coalition and did what he was supposed to.
I say to hell with a coalition. if some country is a risk to us we should take action.
Libya was not a risk to us.
nope...it would be suicidal..usa doesnot understand mindset of people out there...it would be more destructive for usa than vietnam..Iran is one of oldest civilizations and too proud as nation...bombs can't win them over...they can be occupied but can't be won...
Its funny that you say that.
It used to be that in order to win a war you killed the enemy and civilians.
Now we have collateral damage, the U.S. has not defeated an enemy with this new approach of winning hearts and minds.
Yeah, Iran would be a walk in the park for the U.S. if we still tried to defeat the enemy.
nope it wont be...infact usa has learnt that in vieatnam and is learning in afghan...occupying and winning are two different things...and occupying is costlier if you dont win over people...and that side is not profit/loss kinds...they would resist imposer and i am glad slowly world is moving towards that phase of understanding that weapons dont work any more...unless ofcourse mission is to eliminate some ruler...or something like that or bring opposition to negotiation table...for limited goal , it would work but not for longer goals...
You didn't understand what you just read.
Thats ok.
I understand the rational that Obama cited . The fear is that other leaders facing unrest would take actions similar to Gadhafi to quell it. Igniting a Mideast slaughter of the disenfranchised by leaders not willing to cede power. I get it. My beef is that before he decided to wield our fist . He should have addressed us as to the problem at hand.
by Dennis L. Page 11 years ago
When George Bush was president the United States experienced the horrific attacks of 09/11. We were all misled into a war with Iraq and then we went to war in Afghanistan. He pushed to privatize Social Security. Bush was extremely slow in providing relief during hurricane Katrina. Prisoners were...
by Deforest 11 years ago
How come my president is prompter to believe takfiri dogs/criminals versus Assad? Any interests involved? Your opinion. I've noticed that not many people are concerned on the subject. Fear of a potential retaliation from the NSA?Satellites showed the ambassadors that the missiles were shot from the...
by OLYHOOCH 13 years ago
WASHINGTON — There may be less than meets the eye to President Barack Obama's statements Monday night that NATO is taking over from the U.S. in Libya and that U.S. action is limited to defending people under attack there by Moammar Gadhafi's forces. In transferring command and control to NATO, the...
by Susan Reid 12 years ago
This is from FORBES. I am posting the whole article for your consideration:In tonight’s debate we saw a transformed Barack Obama, and it made a very big difference. In the first debate Governor Mitt Romney was relaxed and confident and in command; Obama was practically absent. Tonight, Obama was on...
by OLYHOOCH 13 years ago
A NEWS FLASH, to Mr Obama, from, WE THE PEOPLE. There are 3.4 Billion of us, SENIORS.We are wise to your, OBAMA PLOY'S.Obama Care, no thanks.......Libya NO FLY ZONE TRICK, this will end soon and you think, WE THE PEOPLE, will give you our votes because you will say, YOU prevented another WAR....
by Wesman Todd Shaw 11 years ago
What positive thing did George W. Bush do for the USA?It is far too easy to bring up all the horrific things that George W. Bush has done not just to the United States Of America - but also to the rest of the world, and primarily, Afghanistan and Iraq.What GOOD or POSITIVE thing did the Bush/Cheney...
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |